Commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians
AUTHOR: Luther, Martin
PUBLISHED ON: May 6, 2003

Etext Commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians
by Martin Luther translated by Theodore Graebner

Commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians (1535)
by Martin Luther translated by Theodore Graebner

pp. iii-v


The preparation of this edition of Luther’s Commentary on Galatians was
first suggested to me by Mr. P. J. Zondervan, of the firm of publishers, in
March, 1937. The consultation had the twofold merit of definiteness and

“Luther is still the greatest name in Protestantism. We want you to help us
publish some leading work of Luther’s for the general American market.
Will you do it?”

“I will, on one condition.”

“And what is that?”

“The condition is that I will be permitted to make Luther talk American,
‘streamline’ him, so to speak–because you will never get people, whether
in or outside the Lutheran Church, actually to read Luther unless we make
him talk as he would talk today to Americans.”

I illustrated the point by reading to Mr. Zondervan a few sentences from an
English translation lately reprinted by an American publisher, of one of
Luther’s outstanding reformatory essays.

The demonstration seemed to prove convincing for it was agreed that one
may as well offer Luther in the original German or Latin as expect the
American church-member to read any translations that would adhere to
Luther’s German or Latin constructions and employ the Mid-Victorian
type of English characteristic of the translations now on the market.

“And what book would be your choice?”

“There is one book that Luther himself likes better than any other. Let us
begin with that: his Commentary on Galatians. . .”

The undertaking, which seemed so attractive when viewed as a literary
task, proved a most difficult one, and at times became oppressive. The
Letter to the Galatians consists of six short chapters. Luther’s commentary
fills seven hundred and thirty-three octavo pages in the Weidman Edition
of his works. It was written in Latin. We were resolved not to present this
entire mass of exegesis. It would have run to more than fifteen hundred
pages, ordinary octavo (like this), since it is impossible to use the
compressed structure of sentences which is characteristic of Latin, and
particularly of Luther’s Latin. The work had to be condensed. German and
English translations are available, but the most acceptable English version,
besides laboring under the handicaps of an archaic style, had to be
condensed into half its volume in order to accomplish the “streamlining”
of the book. Whatever merit the translation now presented to the reader may
possess should be written to the credit of Rev. Gerhardt Mahler of Geneva,
N.Y., who came to my assistance in a very busy season by making a rough
draft of the translation and later preparing a revision of it, which
forms the basis of the final draft submitted to the printer. A word should
now be said about the origin of Luther’s Commentary on Galatians.

The Reformer had lectured on this Epistle of St. Paul’s in 1519 and again in
1523. It was his favorite among all the Biblical books. In his table talks the
saying is recorded: “The Epistle to the Galatians is my epistle. To it I am as
it were in wedlock. It is my Katherine.” Much later when a friend of his
was preparing an edition of all his Latin works, he remarked to his home
circle: “If I had my way about it they would republish only those of my
books which have doctrine. My Galatians, for instance. “The lectures which
are preserved in the works herewith submitted to the American public
were delivered in 1531. They were taken down by George Roerer, who
held something of a deanship at Wittenberg University and who was one of
Luther’s aids in the translation of the Bible. Roerer took down Luther’s
lectures and this manuscript has been preserved to the present day, in a
copy which contains also additions by Veit Dietrich and by Cruciger, friends
of Roerer’s, who with him attended Luther’s lectures. In other words, these
three men took down the lectures which Luther addressed to his students
in the course of Galatians, and Roerer prepared the manuscript for the
printer. A German translation by Justus Menius appeared in the
Wittenberg Edition of Luther’s writings, published in 1539.

The importance of this Commentary on Galatians for the history of
Protestantism is very great. It presents like no other of Luther’s writings
the central thought of Christianity, the justification of the sinner for the
sake of Christ’s merits alone. We have permitted in the final revision of
the manuscript many a passage to stand which seemed weak and
ineffectual when compared with the trumpet tones of the Latin original.
But the essence of Luther’s lectures is there. May the reader accept with
indulgence where in this translation we have gone too far in modernizing
Luther’s expression–making him “talk American.”

At the end of his lectures in 1531, Luther uttered a brief prayer and then
dictated two Scriptural texts, which we shall inscribe at the end of these
introductory remarks:

“The Lord who has given us power to teach and to hear, let Him also give
us the power to serve and to do.”

                LUKE 2

          Glory to God in the highest,
          And on earth peace,
          Good will to men.

                    ISAIAH 40

        The Word of our God shall stand forever.

St. Louis, Missouri

                      FROM LUTHER’S INTRODUCTION, 1538

  In my heart reigns this one article, faith in my dear Lord Christ,
  the beginning, middle and end of whatever spiritual and divine
  thoughts I may have, whether by day or by night.

                                  CHAPTER 1

  VERSE 1. Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus
  Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead).

St. Paul wrote this epistle because, after his departure from the Galatian
churches, Jewish-Christian fanatics moved in, who perverted Paul’s Gospel of
man’s free justification by faith in Christ Jesus.

The world bears the Gospel a grudge because the Gospel condemns the religious
wisdom of the world. Jealous for its own religious views, the world in turn
charges the Gospel with being a subversive and licentious doctrine, offensive
to God and man, a doctrine to be persecuted as the worst plague on earth.

As a result we have this paradoxical situation: The Gospel supplies the world
with the salvation of Jesus Christ, peace of conscience, and every blessing.
Just for that the world abhors the Gospel.

These Jewish-Christian fanatics who pushed themselves into the Galatian
churches after Paul’s departure, boasted that they were the descendants of
Abraham, true ministers of Christ, having been trained by the apostles
themselves, that they were able to perform miracles.

In every way they sought to undermine the authority of St. Paul. They said to
the Galatians: “You have no right to think highly of Paul. He was the last to
turn to Christ. But we have seen Christ. We heard Him preach. Paul came later
and is beneath us. It is possible for us to be in error–we who have received
the Holy Ghost? Paul stands alone. He has not seen Christ, nor has he had much
contact with the other apostles. Indeed, he persecuted the Church of Christ for
a long time.”

When men claiming such credentials come along, they deceive not only the
naive, but also those who seemingly are well-established in the faith. This
same argument is used by the papacy. “Do you suppose that God for the sake of
a few Lutheran heretics would disown His entire Church? Or do you suppose that
God would have left His Church floundering in error all these centuries?” The
Galatians were taken in by such arguments with the result that Paul’s
authority and doctrine were drawn in question.

Against these boasting, false apostles, Paul boldly defends his apostolic
authority and ministry. Humble man that he was, he will not now take a back
seat. He reminds them of the time when he opposed Peter to his face and
reproved the chief of the apostles.

Paul devotes the first two chapters to a defense of his office and his Gospel,
affirming that he received it, not from men, but from the Lord Jesus Christ by
special revelation, and that if he or an angel from heaven preach any other
gospel than the one he had preached, he shall be accursed.

                        The Certainty of Our Calling

Every minister should make much of his calling and impress upon others the
fact that he has been delegated by God to preach the Gospel. As the
ambassador of a government is honored for his office and not for his private
person, so the minister of Christ should exalt his office in order to gain
authority among men. This is not vain glory, but needful glorying.

Paul takes pride in his ministry, not to his own praise but to the praise of
God. Writing to the Romans, he declares, “Inasmuch as I am the apostle of the
Gentiles, I magnify mine office,” i.e., I want to be received not as Paul of
Tarsus, but as Paul the apostle and ambassador of Jesus Christ, in order that
people might be more eager to hear. Paul exalts his ministry out of the desire
to make known the name, the grace, and the mercy of God.

  VERSE 1. Paul, an apostle, (not of men, etc.)

Paul loses no time in defending himself against the charge that he had thrust
himself into the ministry. He says to the Galatians: “My call may seem
inferior to you. But those who have come to you are either called of men or by
man. My call is the highest possible, for it is by Jesus Christ, and God the

When Paul speaks of those called “by men,” I take it he means those whom
neither God nor man sent, but who go wherever they like and speak for

When Paul speaks of those called “by man” I take it he means those who have a
divine call extended to them through other persons. God calls in two ways.
Either He calls ministers through the agency of men, or He calls them directly
as He called the prophets and apostles. Paul declares that the false apostles
were called or sent neither by men, nor by man. The most they could claim is
that they were sent by others. “But as for me I was called neither of men, nor
by man, but directly by Jesus Christ. My call is in every respect like the
call of the apostles. In fact I am an apostle.”

Elsewhere Paul draws a sharp distinction between an apostleship and lesser
functions, as in I Corinthians 12:28: “And God hath set some in the church;
first, apostles; secondarily, prophets; thirdly, teachers.” He mentions the
apostles first because they were appointed directly by God.

Matthias was called in this manner. The apostles chose two candidates and then
cast lots, praying that God would indicate which one He would have. To be an
apostle he had to have his appointment from God. In the same manner Paul was
called as the apostle of the Gentiles.

The call is not to be taken lightly. For a person to possess knowledge is not
enough. He must be sure that he is properly called. Those who operate without
a proper call seek no good purpose. God does not bless their labors. They may
be good preachers, but they do no edify. Many of the fanatics of our day
pronounce words of faith, but they bear no good fruit, because their purpose
is to turn men to their perverse opinions. On the other hand, those who have a
divine call must suffer a good deal of opposition in order that they may
become fortified against the running attacks of the devil and the world.

This is our comfort in the ministry, that ours is a divine office to which we
have been divinely called. Reversely, what an awful thing it must be for the
conscience if one is not properly called. It spoils one’s best work. When I
was a young man I thought Paul was making too much of his call. I did not
understand his purpose. I did not then realize the importance of the ministry.
I knew nothing of the doctrine of faith because we were taught sophistry
instead of certainty, and nobody understood spiritual boasting. We exalt our
calling, not to gain glory among men, or money, or satisfaction, or favor, but
because people need to be assured that the words we speak are the words of
God. This is no sinful pride. It is holy pride.

  VERSE 1. And God the Father, who raised him from the dead.

Paul is so eager to come to the subject matter of his epistle, the
righteousness of faith in opposition to the righteousness of works, that
already in the title he must speak his mind. He did not think it quite enough
to say that he was an apostle “by Jesus Christ”; he adds, “and God the Father,
who raised him from the dead.”

The clause seems superfluous on first sight. Yet Paul had a good reason for
adding it. He had to deal with Satan and his agents who endeavored to deprive
him of the righteousness of Christ, who was raised by God the Father from the
dead. These perverters of the righteousness of Christ resist the Father and
the Son, and the works of them both.

In this whole epistle Paul treats of the resurrection of Christ. By His
resurrection Christ won the victory over law, sin, flesh, world, devil, death,
hell, and every evil. And this His victory He donated unto us. These many
tyrants and enemies of ours may accuse and frighten us, but they dare not
condemn us, for Christ, whom God the Father has raised from the dead is our
righteousness and our victory.

Do you notice how well suited to his purpose Paul writes? He does not say, “By
God who made heaven and earth, who is Lord of the angels,” but Paul has in
mind the righteousness of Christ, and speaks to the point, saying, “I am an
apostle, not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father,
who raised him from the dead.”

  VERSE 2. And all the brethren which are with me.

This should go far in shutting the mouths of the false apostles. Paul’s
intention is to exalt his own ministry while discrediting theirs. He adds for
good measure the argument that he does not stand alone, but that all the
brethren with him attest to the fact that his doctrine is divinely true.
“Although the brethren with me are not apostles like myself, yet they are all
of one mind with me, think, write, and teach as I do.”

  VERSE 2. Unto the churches of Galatia.

Paul had preached the Gospel throughout Galatia, founding many churches which
after his departure were invaded by the false apostles. The Anabaptists in our
time imitate the false apostles. They do not go where the enemies of the
Gospel predominate. They go where the Christians are. Why do they not invade
the Catholic provinces and preach their doctrine to godless princes, bishops,
and doctors, as we have done by the help of God? These soft martyrs take no
chances. They go where the Gospel has a hold, so that they may not endanger
their lives. The false apostles would not go to Jerusalem of Caiaphas, or to
the Rome of the Emperor, or to any other place where no man had preached
before as Paul and the other apostles did. But they came to the churches of
Galatia, knowing that where men profess the name of Christ they may feel

It is the lot of God’s ministers not only to suffer opposition at the hand of
a wicked world, but also to see the patient indoctrination of many years
quickly undone by such religious fanatics. This hurts more than the
persecution of tyrants. We are treated shabbily on the outside by tyrants, on
the inside by those whom we have restored to the liberty of the Gospel, and
also by false brethren. But this is our comfort and our glory, that being
called of God we have the promise of everlasting life. We look for that reward
which “eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither hath entered into the heart
of man.”

Jerome raises the question why Paul called them churches that were no
churches, inasmuch as the Galatians had forsaken the grace of Christ for the
law of Moses. The proper answer is: Although the Galatians had fallen away
from the doctrine of Paul, baptism, the Gospel, and the name of Christ
continued among them. Not all the Galatians had become perverted. There were
some who clung to the right view of the Word and the Sacraments. These means
cannot be contaminated. They remain divine regardless of men’s opinion.
Wherever the means of grace are found, there is the Holy Church, even though
Antichrist reigns there. So much for the title of the epistle. Now follows the
greeting of the apostle.

  VERSE 3. Grace be to you, and peace, from God the Father, and from our
  Lord Jesus Christ.

The terms of grace and peace are common terms with Paul and are now pretty
well understood. But since we are explaining this epistle, you will not mind
if we repeat what we have so often explained elsewhere. The article of
justification must be sounded in our ears incessantly because the frailty of
our flesh will not permit us to take hold of it perfectly and to believe it
with all our heart.

The greeting of the Apostle is refreshing. Grace remits sin, and peace quiets
the conscience. Sin and conscience torment us, but Christ has overcome these
fiends now and forever. Only Christians possess this victorious knowledge
given from above. These two terms, grace and peace, constitute Christianity.
Grace involves the remission of sins, peace, and a happy conscience. Sin is
not canceled by lawful living, for no person is able to live up to the Law.
The Law reveals guilt, fills the conscience with terror, and drives men to
despair. Much less is sin taken away by man-invented endeavors. The fact is,
the more a person seeks credit for himself by his own efforts, the deeper he
goes into debt. Nothing can take away sin except the grace of God. In actual
living, however, it is not so easy to persuade oneself that by grace alone, in
opposition to every other means, we obtain the forgiveness of our sins and
peace with God.

The world brands this a pernicious doctrine. The world advances free will, the
rational and natural approach of good works, as the means of obtaining the
forgiveness of sin. But it is impossible to gain peace of conscience by the
methods and means of the world. Experience proves this. Various holy orders
have been launched for the purpose of securing peace of conscience through
religious exercises, but they proved failures because such devices only
increase doubt and despair. We find no rest for our weary bones unless we
cling to the word of grace.

The Apostle does not wish the Galatians grace and peace from the emperor, or
from kings, or from governors, but from God the Father. He wishes them
heavenly peace, the kind of which Jesus spoke when He said, “Peace I leave
unto you: my peace I give unto you.” Worldly peace provides quiet enjoyment of
life and possessions. But in affliction, particularly in the hour of death,
the grace and peace of the world will not deliver us. However, the grace and
peace of God will. They make a person strong and courageous to bear and to
overcome all difficulties, even death itself, because we have the victory of
Christ’s death and the assurance of the forgiveness of our sins.

              Men Should Not Speculate About the Nature of God

The Apostle adds to the salutation the words, “and from our Lord Jesus
Christ.” Was it not enough to say, “from God the Father”?

It is a principle of the Bible that we are not to inquire curiously into the
nature of God. “There shall no man see me, and live,” Exodus 33:20. All who
trust in their own merits to save them disregard this principle and lose sight
of the Mediator, Jesus Christ.

True Christian theology does not inquire into the nature of God, but into
God’s purpose and will in Christ, whom God incorporated in our flesh to live
and to die for our sins. There is nothing more dangerous than to speculate
about the incomprehensible power, wisdom, and majesty of God when the
conscience is in turmoil over sin. To do so is to lose God altogether because
God becomes intolerable when we seek to measure and to comprehend His infinite

We are to seek God as Paul tells us in I Corinthians 1:23, 24: “We preach
Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumbling block, and unto the Greeks
foolishness; but unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the
power of God, and the wisdom of God.” Begin with Christ. He came down to
earth, lived among men, suffered, was crucified, and then He died, standing
clearly before us, so that our hearts and eyes may fasten upon Him. Thus we
shall be kept from climbing into heaven in a curious and futile search after
the nature of God.

If you ask how God may be found, who justifies sinners, know that there is no
other God besides this man Christ Jesus. Embrace Him, and forget about the
nature of God. But these fanatics who exclude our Mediator in their dealings
with God, do not believe me. Did not Christ Himself say: “I am the way, and
the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me”? Without
Christ there is no access to the Father, but futile rambling; no truth, but
hypocrisy; no life, but eternal death.

When you argue about the nature of God apart from the question of
justification, you may be as profound as you like. But when you deal with
conscience and with righteousness over against the law, sin, death, and the
devil, you must close your mind to all inquiries into the nature of God, and
concentrate upon Jesus Christ, who says, “Come unto me, all ye that labor and
are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.” Doing this, you will recognize the
power, and majesty condescending to your condition according to Paul’s
statement to the Colossians, “In Christ are hid all the treasures of wisdom
and knowledge,” and, “In him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.”
Paul in wishing grace and peace not alone from God the Father, but also from
Jesus Christ, wants to warn us against the curious incursions into the nature
of God. We are to hear Christ, who has been appointed by the Father as our
divine Teacher.

                          Christ is God by Nature

At the same time, Paul confirms our creed, “that Christ is very God.” We need
such frequent confirmation of our faith, for Satan will not fail to attack it.
He hates our faith. He knows that it is the victory which overcometh him and
the world. That Christ is very God is apparent in that Paul ascribes to Him
divine powers equally with the Father, as for instance, the power to dispense
grace and peace. This Jesus could not do unless He were God.

To bestow peace and grace lies in the province of God, who alone can create
these blessings. The angels cannot. The apostles could only distribute these
blessings by the preaching of the Gospel. In attributing to Christ the divine
power of creating and giving grace, peace, everlasting life, righteousness,
and forgiveness of sins, the conclusion is inevitable that Christ is truly
God. Similarly, St. John concludes from the works attributed to the Father and
the Son that they are divinely One. Hence, the gifts which we receive from the
Father and from the Son are one and the same. Otherwise Paul should have
written: “Grace from God the Father, and peace from our Lord Jesus Christ.” In
combining them he ascribes them equally to the Father and the Son. I stress
this on account of the many errors emanating from the sects.

The Arians were sharp fellows. Admitting that Christ had two natures, and that
He is called “very God of very God,” they were yet able to deny His divinity.
The Arians took Christ for a noble and perfect creature, superior even to the
angels, because by Him God created heaven and earth. Mohammed also speaks
highly of Christ. But all their praise is mere palaver to deceive men. Paul’s
language is different. To paraphrase him: “You are established in this belief
that Christ is very God because He gives grace and peace, gifts which only God
can create and bestow.”

  VERSE 4. Who gave himself for our sins.

Paul sticks to his theme. He never loses sight of the purpose of his epistle.
He does not say, “Who received our works,” but “who gave.” Gave what? Not
gold, or silver, or paschal lambs, or an angel, but Himself. What for? Not for
a crown, or a kingdom, or our goodness, but for our sins. These words are like
so many thunderclaps of protest from heaven against every kind and type of
self-merit. Underscore these words, for they are full of comfort for sore

How may we obtain remission of our sins? Paul answers: “The man who is
named Jesus Christ and the Son of God gave himself for our sins.” The heavy
artillery of these words explodes papacy, works, merits, superstitions. For if
our sins could be removed by our own efforts, what need was there for the Son
of God to be given for them? Since Christ was given for our sins it stands to
reason that they cannot be put away by our own efforts.

This sentence also defines our sins as great, so great, in fact, that the
whole world could not make amends for a single sin. The greatness of the
ransom, Christ, the Son of God, indicates this. The vicious character of sin
is brought out by the words “who gave himself for our sins.” So vicious is sin
that only the sacrifice of Christ could atone for sin. When we reflect that
the one little word “sin” embraces the whole kingdom of Satan, and that it
includes everything that is horrible, we have reason to tremble. But we are
careless. We make light of sin. We think that by some little work or merit we
can dismiss sin.

This passage, then, bears out the fact that all men are sold under sin. Sin is
an exacting despot who can be vanquished by no created power, but by the
sovereign power of Jesus Christ alone.

All this is of wonderful comfort to a conscience troubled by the enormity of
sin. Sin cannot harm those who believe in Christ, because He has overcome sin
by His death. Armed with this conviction, we are enlightened and may pass
judgment upon the papists, monks, nuns, priests, Mohammedans, Anabaptists, and
all who trust in their own merits, as wicked and destructive sects that rob
God and Christ of the honor that belongs to them alone.

Note especially the pronoun “our” and its significance. You will readily grant
that Christ gave Himself for the sins of Peter, Paul, and others who were
worthy of such grace. But feeling low, you find it hard to believe that Christ
gave Himself for your sins. Our feelings shy at a personal application of the
pronoun “our,” and we refuse to have anything to do with God until we have
made ourselves worthy by good deeds.

This attitude springs from a false conception of sin, the conception that sin
is a small matter, easily taken care of by good works; that we must present
ourselves unto God with a good conscience; that we must feel no sin before we
may feel that Christ was given for our sins.

This attitude is universal and particularly developed in those who consider
themselves better than others. Such readily confess that they are frequent
sinners, but they regard their sins as of no such importance that they cannot
easily be dissolved by some good action, or that they may not appear before
the tribunal of Christ and demand the reward of eternal life for their
righteousness. Meantime they pretend great humility and acknowledge a certain
degree of sinfulness for which they soulfully join in the publican’s prayer,
“God be merciful to me a sinner.” But the real significance and comfort of the
words “for our sins” is lost upon them.

The genius of Christianity takes the words of Paul “who gave himself for our
sins” as true and efficacious. We are not to look upon our sins as
insignificant trifles. On the other hand, we are not to regard them as so
terrible that we must despair. Learn to believe that Christ was given, not for
picayune and imaginary transgressions, but for mountainous sins; not for one
or two, but for all; not for sins that can be discarded, but for sins that are
stubbornly ingrained.

Practice this knowledge and fortify yourself against despair, particularly in
the last hour, when the memory of past sins assails the conscience. Say with
confidence: “Christ, the Son of God, was given not for the righteous, but for
sinners. If I had no sin I should not need Christ. No, Satan, you cannot
delude me into thinking I am holy. The truth is, I am all sin. My sins are not
imaginary transgressions, but sins against the first table, unbelief, doubt,
despair, contempt, hatred, ignorance of God, ingratitude towards Him, misuse
of His name, neglect of His Word, etc.; and sins against the second table,
dishonor of parents, disobedience of government, coveting of another’s
possessions, etc. Granted that I have not committed murder, adultery, theft,
and similar sins in deed, nevertheless I have committed them in the heart, and
therefore I am a transgressor of all the commandments of God.

“Because my transgressions are multiplied and my own efforts at
self-justification rather a hindrance than a furtherance, therefore Christ the
Son of God gave Himself into death for my sins.” To believe this is to have
eternal life.

Let us equip ourselves against the accusations of Satan with this and similar
passages of Holy Scripture. If he says, “Thou shalt be damned,” you tell him:
“No, for I fly to Christ who gave Himself for my sins. In accusing me of being
a damnable sinner, you are cutting your own throat, Satan. You are reminding
me of God’s fatherly goodness toward me, that He so loved the world that He
gave His only-begotten Son that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish,
but have everlasting life. In calling me a sinner, Satan, you really comfort
me above measure.” With such heavenly cunning we are to meet the devil’s craft
and put from us the memory of sin.

St. Paul also presents a true picture of Christ as the virgin-born Son of God,
delivered into death for our sins. To entertain a true conception of Christ is
important, for the devil describes Christ as an exacting and cruel judge who
condemns and punishes men. Tell him that his definition of Christ is wrong,
that Christ has given Himself for our sins, that by His sacrifice He has taken
away the sins of the whole world.

Make ample use of this pronoun “our.” Be assured that Christ has canceled the
sins, not of certain persons only, but your sins. Do not permit yourself to be
robbed of this lovely conception of Christ. Christ is no Moses, no law-giver,
no tyrant, but the Mediator for sins, the Giver of grace and life.

We know this. Yet in the actual conflict with the devil, when he scares us
with the Law, when he frightens us with the very person of the Mediator, when
he misquotes the words of Christ, and distorts for us our Savior, we so easily
lose sight of our sweet High-Priest.

For this reason I am so anxious for you to gain a true picture of Christ out
of the words of Paul “who gave himself for our sins.” Obviously, Christ is no
judge to condemn us, for He gave Himself for our sins. He does not trample the
fallen but raises them. He comforts the broken-hearted. Otherwise Paul should
lie when he writes “who gave himself for our sins.”

I do not bother my head with speculations about the nature of God. I simply
attach myself to the human Christ, and I find joy and peace, and the wisdom of
God in Him. These are not new truths. I am repeating what the apostles and all
teachers of God have taught long ago. Would to God we could impregnate our
hearts with these truths.

  VERSE 4. That he might deliver us from this present evil world.

Paul calls this present world evil because everything in it is subject to the
malice of the devil, who reigns over the whole world as his domain and fills
the air with ignorance, contempt, hatred, and disobedience of God. In this
devils’s kingdom we live.

As long as a person is in the world he cannot by his own efforts rid himself
of sin, because the world is bent upon evil. The people of the world are the
slaves of the devil. If we are not in the Kingdom of Christ, it is certain we
belong to the kingdom of Satan and we are pressed into his service with every
talent we possess.

Take the talents of wisdom and integrity. Without Christ, wisdom is double
foolishness and integrity double sin, because they not only fail to perceive
the wisdom and righteousness of Christ, but hinder and blaspheme the salvation
of Christ. Paul justly calls it the evil or wicked world, for when the world
is at its best the world is at its worst. The grossest vices are small faults
in comparison with the wisdom and righteousness of the world. These prevent
men from accepting the Gospel of the righteousness of Christ. The white devil
of spiritual sin is far more dangerous than the black devil of carnal sin
because the wiser, the better men are without Christ, the more they are likely
to ignore and oppose the Gospel.

With the words, “that he might deliver us,” Paul argues that we stand in need
of Christ. No other being can possibly deliver us from this present evil
world. Do not let the fact disturb you that a great many people enjoy
excellent reputations without Christ. Remember what Paul says, that the world
with all its wisdom, might, and righteousness is the devil’s own. God alone is
able to deliver us from the world.

Let us praise and thank God for His mercy in delivering us from the captivity
of Satan, when we were unable to do so by our own strength. Let us confess
with Paul that all our work-righteousness is loss and dung. Let us condemn as
filthy rags all talk about free will, all religious orders, masses,
ceremonies, vows, fastings, and the like.

In branding the world the devil’s kingdom of iniquity, ignorance, error, sin,
death, and everlasting despair, Paul at the same time declares the Kingdom of
Christ to be a kingdom of equity, light, grace, remission of sin, peace,
saving health, and everlasting life into which we are translated by our Lord
Jesus Christ, to whom be glory forever.

In this passage Paul contends against the false apostles for the article of
Justification. Christ, says Paul, has delivered us from this wicked kingdom of
the devil and the world according to the good will, the pleasure and
commandment of the Father. Hence we are not delivered by our own will, or
shrewdness, or wisdom, but by the mercy and love of God, as it is written,
I John 4:10, “Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and
sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins.”

Another reason why Paul, like John, emphasizes the Father’s will is Christ’s
habit of directing attention to the Father. For Christ came into the world to
reconcile God with us and to draw us to the Father.

Not by curious inquiries into the nature of God shall we know God and His
purpose for our salvation, but by taking hold of Christ, who according to the
will of the Father has given Himself into death for our sins. When we
understand this to be the will of the Father in Christ, then shall we know God
to be merciful, and not angry. We shall realize that He loved us wretched
sinners so much indeed that He gave us His only-begotten Son into death for

The pronoun “our” refers to both God and Father. He is our God and our Father.
Christ’s Father and our Father are one and the same. Hence Christ said to Mary
Magdalene: “Go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and
your Father; and to my God, and your God.” God is our Father and our God, but
only in Christ Jesus.

  VERSE 5. To whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.

Hebrew writing is interspersed with expressions of praise and gratitude. This
peculiarity can be traced in the apostolic writings, particularly in those of
Paul. The name of the Lord is to be mentioned with great reverence and

  VERSE 6. I marvel.

How patiently Paul deals with his seduced Galatians! He does not pounce on
them but, like a father, he fairly excuses their error. With motherly
affection he talks to them yet he does it in a way that at the same time he
also reproves them. On the other hand, he is highly indignant at the seducers
whom he blames for the apostasy of the Galatians. His anger bursts forth in
elemental fury at the beginning of his epistle. “If any may,” he cries,
“preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be
accursed.” Later on, in the fifth chapter, he threatens the false apostles
with damnation. “He that troubleth you shall bear his judgment, whosoever he
be.” He pronounces a curse upon them. “I would they were even cut off which
trouble you.”

He might have addressed the Galatians after this fashion: “I am ashamed of
you. Your ingratitude grieves me. I am angry with you.” But his purpose was to
call them back to the Gospel. With this purpose in his mind he speaks very
gently to them. He could not have chosen a milder expression than this, “I
marvel.” It indicates his sorrow and his displeasure.

Paul minds the rule which he himself lays down in a later chapter where he
says: “Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual,
restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou
also be tempted.” Toward those who have been misled we are to show ourselves
parentally affectionate, so that they may perceive that we seek not their
destruction but their salvation. Over against the devil and his missionaries,
the authors of false doctrines and sects, we ought to be like the Apostle,
impatient, and rigorously condemnatory, as parents are with the dog that bites
their little one, but the weeping child itself they soothe.

The right spirit in Paul supplies him with an extraordinary facility in
handling the afflicted consciences of the fallen. The Pope and his bishops,
inspired by the desire to lord it over men’s souls, crack out thunders and
curses upon miserable consciences. They have no care for the saving of men’s
souls. They are interested only in maintaining their position.

  VERSE 6. That ye are so soon.

Paul deplores the fact that it is difficult for the mind to retain a sound and
steadfast faith. A man labors for a decade before he succeeds in training his
little church into orderly religion, and then some ignorant and vicious
poltroon comes along to overthrow in a minute the patient labor of years. By
the grace of God we have effected here in Wittenberg the form of a Christian
church. The Word of God is taught as it should be, the Sacraments are
administered, and everything is prosperous. This happy condition, secured by
many years of arduous labors, some lunatic might spoil in a moment. This
happened in the churches of Galatia which Paul had brought into life in
spiritual travail. Soon after his departure, however, these Galatian churches
were thrown into confusion by the false apostles.

The church is a tender plant. It must be watched. People hear a couple of
sermons, scan a few pages of Holy Writ, and think they know it all. They are
bold because they have never gone through any trials of faith. Void of the
Holy Spirit, they teach what they please as long as it sounds good to the
common people who are ever ready to join something new.

We have to watch out for the devil lest he sow tares among the wheat while we
sleep. No sooner had Paul turned his back on the churches of Galatia, than the
false apostles went to work. Therefore, let us watch over ourselves and over
the whole church.

  VERSE 6. I marvel that ye are so soon removed.

Again the Apostle puts in a gentle word. He does not berate the Galatians, “I
marvel that ye are so unsteady, unfaithful.” He says, “I marvel that ye are so
soon removed.” He does not address them as evildoers. He speaks to them as
people who have suffered great loss. He condemns those who removed them
rather than the Galatians. At the same time he gently reproves them for rather
themselves to be removed. The criticism is implied that they should have been
permitting a little more settled in their beliefs. If they had taken better hold
of the Word they could not have been removed so easily.

Jerome thinks that Paul is playing upon the name Galatians, deriving it from
the Hebrew word Galath, which means fallen or carried away, as though Paul
wanted to say, “You are true Galatians, i.e., fallen away in name and in
fact.” Some believe that the Germans are descended from the Galatians. There
may be something to that. For the Germans are not unlike the Galatians in
their lack of constancy. At first we Germans are very enthusiastic, but
presently our emotions cool and we become slack. When the light of the Gospel
first came to us many were zealous, heard sermons greedily, and held the
ministry of God’s Word in high esteem. But now that religion has been
reformed, many who formerly were such earnest disciples have discarded the
Word of God, have become sow-bellies like the foolish and inconsistent

  VERSE 6. From him that called you into the grace of Christ.

The reading is a little doubtful. The sentence may be construed to read: “From
that Christ that called you into grace”; or it may be construed to read: “From
God that called you into the grace of Christ.” I prefer the former for it
seems to me that Paul’s purpose is to impress upon us the benefits of Christ.
This reading also preserves the implied criticism that the Galatians withdrew
themselves from that Christ who had called them not unto the law, but unto
grace. With Paul we decry the blindness and perverseness of men in that they
will not receive the message of grace and salvation, or having received it
they quickly let go of it, in spite of the fact that the Gospel bestows all
good things spiritual: forgiveness of sins, true righteousness, peace of
conscience, everlasting life; and all good things temporal: good judgment,
good government and peace.

Why does the world abhor the glad tidings of the Gospel and the blessings that
go with it? Because the world is the devil’s. Under his direction the world
persecutes the Gospel and would if it could nail again Christ, the Son of God,
to the Cross although He gave Himself into death for the sins of the world.
The world dwells in darkness. The world is darkness.

Paul accentuates the point that the Galatians had been called by Christ unto
grace. “I taught you the doctrine of grace and of liberty from the Law, from
sin and wrath, that you should be free in Christ, and not slaves to the hard
laws of Moses. Will you allow yourselves to be carried away so easily from
the living fountain of grace and life?”

  VERSE 6. Unto another gospel.

Note the resourcefulness of the devil. Heretics do not advertise their errors.
Murderers, adulterers, thieves disguise themselves. So the devil masquerades
all his devices and activities. He puts on white to make himself look like an
angel of light. He is astoundingly clever to sell his patent poison for the
Gospel of Christ. Knowing Satan’s guile, Paul sardonically calls the doctrine
of the false apostles “another gospel,” as if he would say, “You Galatians
have now another gospel, while my Gospel is no longer esteemed by you.”

We infer from this that the false apostles had depreciated the Gospel of Paul
among the Galatians on the plea that it was incomplete. Their objection to
Paul’s Gospel is identical to that recorded in the fifteenth chapter of the
Book of Acts to the effect that it was not enough for the Galatians to believe
in Christ, or to be baptized, but that it was needful to circumcise them, and
to command them to keep the law of Moses, for “except ye be circumcised after
the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved.” As though Christ were a workman
who had begun a building and left it for Moses to finish.

Today the Anabaptists and others, finding it difficult to condemn us, accuse
us Lutherans of timidity in professing the whole truth. They grant that we
have laid the foundation in Christ, but claim that we have failed to go
through with the building. In this way these perverse fanatics parade their
cursed doctrine as the Word of God, and, flying the flag of God’s name, they
deceive many. The devil knows better than to appear ugly and black. He prefers
to carry on his nefarious activities in the name of God. Hence the German
proverb: “All mischief begins in the name of God.”

When the devil sees that he cannot hurt the cause of the Gospel by destructive
methods, he does it under the guise of correcting and advancing the cause of
the Gospel. He would like best of all to persecute us with fire and sword, but
this method has availed him little because through the blood of martyrs the
church has been watered. Unable to prevail by force, he engages wicked and
ungodly teachers who at first make common cause with us, then claim that
they are particularly called to teach the hidden mysteries of the Scriptures
to superimpose upon the first principles of Christian doctrine that we teach.
This sort of thing brings the Gospel into trouble. May we all cling to the
Word of Christ against the wiles of the devil, “for we wrestle not against
flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the
rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high

  VERSE 7. Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you.

Here again the apostle excuses the Galatians, while he blames the false
apostles for disturbing their consciences and for stealing them out of his
hand. How angry he gets at these deceivers! He calls them troublemakers,
seducers of poor consciences.

This passage adduces further evidence that the false apostles defamed
Paul as an imperfect apostle and a weak and erroneous preacher. They
condemn Paul, Paul condemns them. Such warfare of condemnation is
always going on in the church. The papists and the fanatics hate us,
condemn our doctrine, and want to kill us. We in turn hate and condemn
their cursed doctrine. In the meanwhile the people are uncertain whom to
follow and which way to turn, for it is not given to everybody to judge
these matters. But the truth will win out. So much is certain, we
persecute no man, neither does our doctrine trouble men. On the contrary,
we have the testimony of many good men who thank God on their knees for
the consolation that our doctrine has brought them. Like Paul, we are not
to blame that the churches have trouble. The fault lies with the
Anabaptists and other fanatics.

Every teacher of work-righteousness is a trouble-maker. Has it never
occurred to you that the pope, cardinals, bishops, monks, and that the
whole synagogue of Satan are trouble-makers? The truth is, they are
worse than false apostles. The files apostles taught that in addition to
faith in Christ the works of the Law of God were necessary unto salvation.
But the papists omit faith altogether and teach self-devised traditions
and works that are not commanded of God, indeed are contrary to the Word
of God, and for these traditions they demand preferred attention and

Paul calls the false apostles troublers of the church because they taught
circumcision and the keeping of the Law as needful unto salvation. They
insisted that the Law must be observed in every detail. They were
supporters in this contention by the Jews, with the result that those who
were not firmly established in faith were easily persuaded that Paul was
not a sincere teacher of God because he ignored the Law. The Jews were
offended at the idea that the Law of God should be entirely ignored by Paul
and that the Gentiles, former idol-worshippers, should gratuitously attain
to the station of God’s people without circumcision, without the
penitentiary performance of the law, by grace alone through faith in
Christ Jesus.

These criticisms were amplified by the false apostles. They accused Paul
of designs to abolish the law of God and the Jewish dispensation, contrary
to the law of God, contrary to their Jewish heritage, contrary to apostolic
example, contrary to Paul’s own example. They demanded that Paul be
shunned as a blasphemer and a rebel, while they were to be heard as true
teachers of the Gospel and authentic disciples of the apostles. Thus Paul
stood defamed among the Galatians. He was forced to attack the false
apostles. He did so without hesitation.

  VERSE 7. And would pervert the gospel of Christ.
To paraphrase this sentence: “These false apostles do not merely trouble
you, they abolish Christ’s Gospel. They act as if they were the only true
Gospel-preachers. For all that they muddle Law and Gospel. As a result
they pervert the Gospel. Either Christ must live and the Law perish, or the
Law remains and Christ must perish; Christ and the Law cannot dwell side
by side in the conscience. It is either grace or law. To muddle the two is
to eliminate the Gospel of Christ entirely.”

It seems a small matter to mingle the Law and Gospel, faith and works,
but it creates more mischief than man’s brain can conceive. To mix Law
and Gospel not only clouds the knowledge of grace, it cuts out Christ

The words of Paul, “and would pervert the gospel of Christ,” also indicate
how arrogant these false apostles were. They were shameless boasters.
Paul simply had to exalt his own ministry and Gospel.

  VERSE 8. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other
  gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him
  be accursed.

Paul’s zeal for the Gospel becomes so fervent that it almost leads him to
curse angels. “I would rather that I, my brethren, yes, the angels of heaven
be anathematized than that my gospel be overthrown.”

The Greek word _anathema_, Hebrew _herem_, means to accurse,
execrate, to damn. Paul first (hypothetically) curses himself. Knowing
persons first find fault with themselves in order that they may all the
more earnestly reprove others.

Paul maintains that there is no other gospel besides the one he had
preached to the Galatians. He preached, not a gospel of his own invention,
but the very same Gospel God had long ago prescribed in the Sacred
Scriptures. No wonder Paul pronounces curses upon himself and upon
others, upon the angels of heaven, if anyone should dare to preach any
other gospel than Christ’s own.

  VERSE 9. As we said before, so say I now again. If any man preach
  any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be

Paul repeats the curse, directing it now upon other persons. Before, he
cursed himself, his brethren, and an angel from heaven. “Now,” he says, “if
there are any others who preach a gospel different from that you have
received from us, let them also be accursed.” Paul herewith curses and
excommunicates all false teachers including his opponents. He is so
worked up that he dares to curse all who pervert his Gospel. Would to God
that this terrible pronouncement of the Apostle might strike fear into the
hearts of all who pervert the Gospel of Paul.

The Galatians might say: “Paul, we do not pervert the Gospel you have
brought unto us. We did not quite understand it. That is all. Now these
teachers who came after you have explained everything so beautifully.”
This explanation the Apostle refuses to accept. They must add nothing;
they must correct nothing. “What you received from me is the genuine
Gospel of God. Let it stand. If any man brings any other gospel than the one
I brought you, or promises to deliver better things than you have received
from me, let him be accursed.”

In spite of this emphatic denunciation so many accept the pope as the
supreme judge of the Scriptures. “The Church,” they say, “chose only four
gospels. The Church might have chosen more. Ergo the Church is above the
Gospel.” With equal force one might argue: “I approve the Scriptures. Ergo I
am above the Scriptures. John the Baptist confessed Christ. Hence he is
above Christ.” Paul subordinates himself, all preachers, all the angels of
heaven, everybody to the Sacred Scriptures. We are not the masters,
judges, or arbiters, but witnesses, disciples, and confessors of the
Scriptures, whether we be pope, Luther, Augustine, Paul, or an angel from

  VERSE 10. For do I now persuade men, or God?

With the same vehemence Paul continues: “You Galatians ought to be able
to tell from my preaching and from the many afflictions which I have
endured, whether I serve men or God. Everybody can see that my preaching
has stirred up persecution against me everywhere, and has earned for me
the cruel hatred of my own people, in fact the hatred of all men. This
should convince you that by my preaching I do not seek the favor and
praise of men, but the glory of God.”

No man can say that we are seeking the favor and praise of men with our
doctrine. We teach that all men are naturally depraved. We condemn man’s
free will, his strength, wisdom, and righteousness. We say that we obtain
grace by the free mercy of God alone for Christ’s sake. This is no preaching
to please men. This sort of preaching procures for us the hatred and
disfavor of the world, persecutions, excommunications, murders, and

“Can’t you see that I seek no man’s favor by my doctrine?” asks Paul. “If I
were anxious for the favor of men I would flatter them. But what do I do?
I condemn their works. I teach things only that I have been commanded to
teach from above. For that I bring down upon my head the wrath of Jews
and Gentiles. My doctrine must be right. It must be divine. Any other
doctrine cannot be better than mine. Any other doctrine must be false and

With Paul we boldly pronounce a curse upon every doctrine that does not
agree with ours. We do not preach for the praise of men, or the favor of
princes. We preach for the favor of God alone whose grace and mercy we
proclaim. Whosoever teaches a gospel contrary to ours, or different from
ours, let us be bold to say that he is sent of the devil.

  VERSE 10. Or do I seek to please men?

“Do I serve men or God?” Paul keeps an eye on the false apostles, those
flatterers of men. They taught circumcision to avoid the hatred and
persecution of men.

To this day you will find many who seek to please men in order that they
may live in peace and security. They teach whatever is agreeable to men,
no matter whether it is contrary to God’s Word or their own conscience.
But we who endeavor to please God and not men, stir up hell itself. We
must suffer reproach, slanders, death.

For those who go about to please men we have a word from Christ
recorded in the fifth chapter of St. John: “How can ye believe, which
receive honor one of another, and seek not the honor that cometh from God

  VERSE 10. For if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of

Observe the consummate cleverness with which the false apostles went
about to bring Paul into disrepute. They combed Paul’s writings for
contradictions (our opponents do the same) to accuse him of teaching
contradictory things. They found that Paul had circumcised Timothy
according to the Law, that Paul had purified himself with four other men
in the Temple at Jerusalem, that Paul had shaven his head at Cenchrea. The
false apostles slyly suggested that Paul had been constrained by the other
apostles to observe these ceremonial laws. We know that Paul observed
these _decora_ out of charitable regard for the weak brethren. He did not
want to offend them. But the false apostles turned Paul’s charitable
regard to his disadvantage. If Paul had preached the Law and circumcision,
if he had commended the strength and free will of man, he would not have
been so obnoxious to the Jews. On the contrary they would have praised his
every action.

  VERSES 11, 12. But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which
  was preached of me is not after man. For I neither received it of
  man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.

This passage constitutes Paul’s chief defense against the accusations of
his opponents. He maintains under oath that he received his Gospel not
from men, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.

In declaring that his Gospel is not after man, Paul does not merely wish
to state that his Gospel is not mundane. The false apostles made the same
claim for their gospel. Paul means to say that he learned his Gospel not in
the usual and accepted manner through the agency of men by hearing,
reading, or writing. He received the Gospel by special revelation directly
from Jesus Christ.

Paul received his Gospel on the way to Damascus when Christ appeared to
him. St. Luke furnishes an account of the incident in the ninth chapter of
the Book of Acts. “Arise,” said Christ to Paul, “and go into the city, and it
shall be told thee what thou must do.” Christ did not send Paul into the
city to learn the Gospel from Ananias. Ananias was only to baptize Paul, to
lay his hands on Paul, to commit the ministry of the Word unto Paul, and to
recommend him to the Church. Ananias recognized his limited assignment
when he said to Paul: “Brother Saul, the Lord, even Jesus, that appeared
unto thee in the way as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest
receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Ghost.” Paul did not receive
instruction from Ananias. Paul had already been called, enlightened, and
taught by Christ in the road. His contact with Ananias was merely a
testimonal to the fact that Paul had been called by Christ to preach the

Paul was forced to speak of his conversion to combat the slanderous
contention of the false apostles to the effect that this apostleship was
inferior to that of the other apostles.

If it were not for the example of the Galatian churches I would never have
thought it possible that anybody who had received the Word of God with
such eagerness as they had, could so quickly let go of it. Good Lord, what
terrible mischief one single false statement can create.

The article of justification is fragile. Not in itself, of course, but in us. I
know how quickly a person can forfeit the joy of the Gospel. I know in
what slippery places even those stand who seem to have a good footing in
the matters of faith. In the midst of the conflict when we should be
consoling ourselves with the Gospel, the Law rears up and begins to rage
all over our conscience. I say the Gospel is frail because we are frail.

What makes matters worse is that one-half of ourselves, our own reason,
stands against us. The flesh resists the spirit, or as Paul puts it, “The
flesh lusteth against the Spirit.” Therefore we teach that to know Christ
and to believe in Him is no achievement of man, but the gift of God. God
alone can create and preserve faith in us. God creates faith in us through
the Word. He increases, strengthens and confirms faith in us through His
word. Hence the best service that anybody can render God is diligently to
hear and read God’s Word. On the other hand, nothing is more perilous than
to be weary of the Word of God. Thinking he knows enough, a person begins
little by little to despise the Word until he has lost Christ and the Gospel

Let every believer carefully learn the Gospel. Let him continue in humble
prayer. We are molested not by puny foes, but by mighty ones, foes who
never grow tired of warring against us. These, our enemies, are many: Our
own flesh, the world, the Law, sin, death, the wrath and judgment of God,
and the devil himself.

The arguments which the false apostles advanced impress people to this
day. “Who are you to dissent from the fathers and the entire Church, and to
bring a contradictory doctrine? Are you wiser than so many holy men,
wiser than the whole Church?” When Satan, abetted by our own reason,
advances these arguments against us, we lose heart, unless we keep on
saying to ourselves: “I don’t care if Cyprian, Ambrose, Augustine, Peter,
Paul, John, or an angel from heaven, teaches so and so. I know that I teach
the truth of God in Christ Jesus.”

When I first took over the defense of the Gospel, I remembered what
Doctor Staupitz said to me. “I like it well,” he said, “that the doctrine
which you proclaim gives glory to God alone and none to man. For never can
too much glory, goodness, and mercy be ascribed unto God.” These words of
the worthy Doctor comforted and confirmed me. The Gospel is true because
it deprives men of all glory, wisdom, and righteousness and turns over all
honor to the Creator alone. It is safer to attribute too much glory unto God
than unto man.

You may argue that the Church and the fathers are holy. Yet the Church is
compelled to pray: “Forgive us our trespasses,” I am not to be believed, nor
is the Church to be believed, or the fathers, or the apostles, or an angel
from heaven, if they teach anything contrary to the Word of God. Let the
Word of God abide forever.

Peter erred in life and in doctrine. Paul might have dismissed Peter’s
error as a matter of no consequence. But Paul saw that Peter’s error would
lead to the damage of the whole Church unless it were corrected.
Therefore he withstood Peter to his face. The Church, Peter, the apostles,
angels from heaven, are not to be heard unless they teach the genuine Word
of God.

This argument is not always to our advantage. People ask: “Whom then
shall we believe?” Our opponents maintain that they teach the pure Word
of God. We do not believe them. They in turn hate and persecute us for vile
heretics. What can we do about it? With Paul we glory in the Gospel of
Jesus Christ. What do we gain? We are told that our glorying is idle vanity
and unadulterated blasphemy. The moment we abase ourselves and give in
to the rage of our opponents, Papists and Anabaptists grow arrogant. The
Anabaptists hatch out some new monstrosity. The Papists revive their old
abominations. What to do? Let everybody become sure of his calling and
doctrine, that he may boldly say with Paul: “But though we, or an angel
from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than ye have received, let
him be accursed.”

  VERSES 13, 14. For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in
  the Jews’ religion, how that beyond measure I persecuted the church
  of God, and wasted it: And profited in the Jews’ religion above many
  my equals in mine own nation.

This passage does not contain doctrine. Paul adduces his own case for an
example. “I have,” he says, “at one time defended the traditions of the
Pharisees more fiercely than any of your false apostles. Now, if the
righteousness of the Law had been worth anything I would never have
forsaken it. So carefully did I live up to the Law that I excelled many of
my companions. So zealous was I in defense of the Law that I wasted the
church of God.”

  VERSE 14. Being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my

Speaking now of the Mosaic Law, Paul declares that he was wrapped up in
it. To the Philippians he wrote: “As touching the law, a Pharisee;
concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which
is in the law, blameless.” He means to say, “I can compare myself with the
best and holiest of all those who are of the circumcision. Let them show
me if they can, a more earnest defender of the Mosaic Law than I was at
one time. This fact, O Galatians, should have put you on your guard against
these deceivers who make so much of the Law. If anybody ever had reason
to glory in the righteousness of the Law, it was I.”
I too may say that before I was enlightened by the Gospel, I was as
zealous for the papistical laws and traditions of the fathers as ever a man
was. I tried hard to live up to every law as best I could. I punished myself
with fasting, watching, praying, and other exercises more than all those
who today hate and persecute me. I was so much in earnest that I imposed
upon my body more than it could stand. I honored the pope as a matter of
conscience. Whatever I did, I did with a single heart to the glory of God.
But our opponents, well-fed idlers that they are, will not believe what I
and many others have endured.

  VERSES 15, 16, 17. But when it pleased God, who separated me from
  my mother’s womb, and called me by his grace. To reveal his Son in
  me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I
  conferred not with flesh and blood: Neither went I up to Jerusalem to
  them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and
  returned again unto Damascus.

Here Paul relates that immediately upon being called by God to preach the
Gospel to the Gentiles, he went into Arabia without consulting a single
person. “When it had pleased God,” he writes, “I did not deserve it. I had
been an enemy of Christ. I had blasphemed His Gospel. I had shed innocent
blood. In the midst of my frenzy I was called. Why? On account of my
outrageous cruelty? Indeed not. My gracious God who shows mercy unto
whom He will, pardoned all mine iniquities. He bestowed His grace upon
me, and called me for an apostle.”

We also have come to the knowledge of the truth by the same kindness of
God. I crucified Christ daily in my cloistered life, and blasphemed God by
my wrong faith. Outwardly I kept myself chaste, poor, and obedient. I was
much given to fasting, watching, praying, saying of masses, and the like.
Yet under the cloak of my outward respectability I continually mistrusted,
doubted, feared, hated, and blasphemed God. My righteousness was a filthy
puddle. Satan loves such saints. They are his darlings, for they quickly
destroy their body and soul by depriving them of the blessings of God’s
generous gifts.

I tell you I stood in awe of the pope’s authority. To dissent from him I
considered a crime worthy of eternal death. I thought of John Huss as a
cursed heretic. I counted it a sin even to think of him. I would gladly have
furnished the wood to burn him. I would have felt I had done God a real

In comparison with these sanctimonious hypocrites of the papacy,
publicans and harlots are not bad. They at least feel remorse. They at least
do not try to justify their wicked deeds. But these pretended saints, so far
from acknowledging their errors, justify them and regard them as
acceptable sacrifices unto God.

  VERSE 15. When it pleased God.

“By the favor of God I, a wicked and cursed wretch, a blasphemer,
persecutor, and rebel, was spared. Not content to spare me, God granted
unto me the knowledge of His salvation, His Spirit, His Son, the office of
an apostle, everlasting life.” Paul speaking.

God not only pardoned our iniquities, but in addition overwhelmed us with
blessings and spiritual gifts. Many, however, are ungrateful. Worse, by
opening again a window to the devil many begin to loathe God’s Word, and
end by perverting the Gospel.

  VERSE 15. Who separated me from my mother’s womb.

This is a Hebrew expression, meaning to sanctify, ordain, prepare. Paul is
saying, “When I was not yet born God ordained me to be an apostle, and in
due time confirmed my apostleship before the world. Every gift, be it
small or great, spiritual or temporal, and every good thing I should ever
do, God has ordained while I was yet in my mother’s womb where I could
neither think nor perform any good thing. After I was born God supported
me. Heaping mercy upon mercy, He freely forgave my sins, replenishing me
with His grace to enable me to learn what great things are ours in Christ.
To crown it all, He called me to preach the Gospel to others.”

  VERSE 15. And called me by his grace.

“Did God call me on account of my holy life? Or on account of my
pharisaical religion? Or on account of my prayers, fastings, and works?
Never. Well, then, it is certain God did not call me on account of my
blasphemies, persecutions, oppressions. What prompted Him to call me?
His grace alone.”

  VERSE 16. To reveal his Son to me.

We now hear what kind of doctrine was committed to Paul: The doctrine
of the Gospel, the doctrine of the revelation of the Son of God. This
doctrine differs greatly from the Law. The Law terrorizes the conscience.
The Law reveals the wrath and judgment of God. The Gospel does not
threaten. The Gospel announces that Christ is come to forgive the sins of
the world. The Gospel conveys to us the inestimable treasures of God.

  VERSE 16. That I might preach him among the heathen.

“It pleased God,” says the Apostle, “to reveal himself in me. Why? For a
twofold purpose. That I personally should believe in the Son of God, and
that I should reveal Him to the Gentiles.”

Paul doe not mention the Jews, for the simple reason that he was the
called and acknowledged apostle of the Gentiles, although he preached
Christ also to the Jews.

We can hear the Apostle saying to himself: “I will not burden the Gentiles
with the Law, because I am their apostle and not their lawgiver. Not once
did you Galatians hear me speak of the righteousness of the Law or of
works. My job was to bring you the Gospel. Therefore you ought to listen to
no teachers of the Law, but the Gospel: not Moses, but the Son of God; not
the righteousness of works, but the righteousness of faith must be
proclaimed to the Gentiles. That is the right kind of preaching for

  VERSE 16. Immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood.

Once Paul had received the Gospel from Christ, he conferred with nobody
in Damascus. He asked no man to teach him. He did not go up to Jerusalem
to sit at the feet of Peter and the other apostles. At once he preached
Jesus Christ in Damascus.

  VERSE 17. Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were
  apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto

“I went to Arabia before I saw any of the apostles. I took it upon myself
to preach the Gospel to the Gentiles without delay, because Christ had
called me for that purpose.” This statement refutes the assertion of the
false apostles that Paul had been a pupil of the apostles, from which the
false apostles inferred that Paul had been instructed in the obedience of
the Law, that therefore the Gentiles also ought to keep the Law and submit
to circumcision.

  VERSES 18, 19. Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see
  Peter, and abode with him fifteen days. But other of the apostles
  saw I none, save James the Lord’s brother.

Paul minutely recounts his personal history to stop the cavil of the false
apostles. Paul does not deny that he had been with some of the apostles.
He went to Jerusalem uninvited, not to be instructed, but to visit with
Peter. Luke reports the occasion in the ninth chapter of the Book of Acts.
Barnabas introduced Paul to the apostles and related to them how Paul had
met the Lord Jesus on the way to Damascus, also how Paul had preached
boldly at Damascus in the name of Jesus. Paul says that he saw Peter and
James, but he denies that he learned anything from them.

Why does Paul harp on this seemingly unimportant fact? To convince the
churches of Galatia that his Gospel was the true Word of Christ which he
learned from Christ Himself and from no man. Paul was forced to affirm
and re-affirm this fact. His usefulness to all the churches that had used
him as their pastor and teacher was at stake.

  VERSE 20. Now the things which I write unto you, behold, before God,
  I lie not.

Was it necessary for Paul to go under oath? Yes. Paul is reporting
personal history. How else would the churches believe him? The false
apostles might say, “Who knows whether Paul is telling the truth?” Paul,
the elect vessel of God, was held in so little esteem by his own Galatians
to whom he had preached Christ that it was necessary for him to swear an
oath that he spoke the truth. If this happened to Paul, what business have
we to complain when people doubt our words, or hold us in little regard,
we who cannot begin to compare ourselves with the Apostle?

  VERSE 21. Afterwards I came into the regions of Syria and Cilicia.

Syria and Cilicia are adjacent countries. Paul traces his movements
carefully in order to convince the Galatians that he had never been the
disciple of any apostle.

  VERSES 22, 23, 24. And was unknown by face unto the churches of
  Judaea which were in Christ: But they had heard only, that he which
  persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith which once he
  destroyed. And they glorified God in me.

In Syria and Cilicia Paul won the indorsement of all the churches of
Judea, by his preaching. All the churches everywhere, even those of Judea,
could testify that he had preached the same faith everywhere. “And,” Paul
adds, “these churches glorified God in me, not because I taught that
circumcision and the law of Moses should be observed, but because I urged
upon all faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.”

                                  CHAPTER 2

  VERSE 1. Then fourteen years after I went up again to Jerusalem.

Paul taught justification by faith in Christ Jesus, without the deeds of the
Law. He reported this to the disciples at Antioch. Among the disciples were
some that had been brought up in the ancient customs of the Jews. These rose
against Paul in quick indignation, accusing him of propagating a gospel of

Great dissension followed. Paul and Barnabas stood up for the truth. They
testified: “Wherever we preached to the Gentiles, the Holy Ghost came upon
those who received the Word. This happened everywhere. We preached not
circumcision, we did not require observance of the Law. We preached faith in
Jesus Christ. At our preaching of faith, God gave to the hearers the Holy
Ghost.” From this fact Paul and Barnabas inferred that the Holy Ghost approved
the faith of the Gentiles without the Law and circumcision. If the faith of the
Gentiles had not pleased the Holy Ghost, He would not have manifested His
presence in the uncircumcised hearers of the Word.

Unconvinced, the Jews fiercely opposed Paul, asserting that the Law ought to
be kept and that the Gentiles ought to be circumcised, or else they could not
be saved.

When we consider the obstinacy with which Romanists cling to their traditions,
we can very well understand the zealous devotion of the Jews for the Law.
After all, they had received the Law from God. We can understand how
impossible it was for recent converts from Judaism suddenly to break with the
Law. For that matter, God did bear with them, as He bore with the infirmity of
Israel when the people halted between two religions. Was not God patient with
us also while we were blindfolded by the papacy? God is longsuffering and full
of mercy. But we dare not abuse the patience of the Lord. We dare no longer
continue in error now that the truth has been revealed in the Gospel.
The opponents of Paul had his own example to prefer against him. Paul had
circumcised Timothy. Paul defended his action on the ground that he had
circumcised Timothy, not from compulsion, but from Christian love, lest the
weak in faith should be offended. His opponents would not accept Paul’s

When Paul saw that the quarrel was getting out of hand he obeyed the
direction of God and left for Jerusalem, there to confer with the other
apostles. He did this not for his own sake, but for the sake of the people.

  VERSE 1. With Barnabas, and took Titus with me also.

Paul chose two witnesses, Barnabas and Titus. Barnabas had been Paul’s
preaching companion to the Gentiles. Barnabas was an eye-witness of the fact
that the Holy Ghost had come upon the Gentiles in response to the simple
preaching of faith in Jesus Christ. Barnabas stuck to Paul on this point, that
it was not necessary for the Gentiles to be bothered with the Law as long as
they believed in Christ.

Titus was superintendent of the churches in Crete, having been placed in
charge of the churches by Paul. Titus was a former Gentile.

  VERSE 2. And I went up by revelation.

If God had not ordered Paul to Jerusalem, Paul would never have gone there.

  VERSE 2. And communicated unto them that gospel.

After an absence of fourteen years, respectively eighteen years, Paul returned
to Jerusalem to confer with the other apostles.

  VERSE 2. Which I preach among the Gentiles.

Among the Jews Paul allowed Law and circumcision to stand for the time being.
So did all the apostles. Nevertheless Paul held fast to the liberty of the
Gospel. On one occasion he said to the Jews: “Through this man (Christ) is
preached unto you forgiveness of sins; and by him all that believe are
justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of
Moses.” (Acts 13:39.) Always remembering the weak, Paul did not insist that
they break at once with the Law.

Paul admits that he conferred with the apostles concerning his Gospel. But he
denies that the conference benefited or taught him anything. The fact is he
resisted those who wanted to force the practice of the Law upon the Gentiles.
They did not overcome him, he overcame them. “Your false apostles lie, when
they say that I circumcised Timothy, shaved my head in Cenchrea, and went up
to Jerusalem, at the request of the apostles. I went to Jerusalem at the
request of God. What is more, I won the indorsement of the apostles. My
opponents lost out.”

The matter upon which the apostles deliberated in conference was this: Is the
observance of the Law requisite unto justification? Paul answered: “I have
preached faith in Christ to the Gentiles, and not the Law. If the Jews want to
keep the Law and be circumcised, very well, as long as they do so from a right

  VERSE 2. But privately to them which were of reputation.

This is to say, “I conferred not only with the brethren, but with the leaders
among them.”

  VERSE 2. Lest by any means I should run, or had run, in vain.

Not that Paul himself ever thought he had run in vain. However, many did think
that Paul had preached the Gospel in vain, because he kept the Gentiles free
from the yoke of the Law. The opinion that obedience to the Law was mandatory
unto salvation was gaining ground. Paul meant to remedy this evil. By this
conference he hoped to establish the identity of his Gospel with that of the
other apostles, to stop the talk of his opponents that he had been running
around in vain.

  VERSE 3. But neither Titus, who was with me, being a Greek, was
  compelled to be circumcised.

The word “compelled” acquaints us with the outcome of the conference. It was
resolved that the Gentiles should not be compelled to be circumcised.

Paul did not condemn circumcision in itself. Neither by word nor deed did he
ever inveigh against circumcision. But he did protest against circumcision
being made a condition for salvation. He cited the case of the Fathers. “The
fathers were not justified by circumcision. It was to them a sign and seal of
righteousness. They looked upon circumcision as a confession of their faith.”

The believing Jews, however, could not get it through their heads that
circumcision was not necessary for salvation. They were encouraged in their
wrong attitude by the false apostles. The result was that the people were up in
arms against Paul and his doctrine.

Paul did not condemn circumcision as if it were a sin to receive it. But he
insisted, and the conference upheld him, that circumcision had no bearing upon
salvation and was therefore not to be forced upon the Gentiles. The conference
agreed that the Jews should be permitted to keep their ancient customs for
the time being, so long as they did not regard those customs as conveying God’s
justification of the sinner.

The false apostles were dissatisfied with the verdict of the conference. They
did not want to rest circumcision and the practice of the Law in Christian
liberty. They insisted that circumcision was obligatory unto salvation.

As the opponents of Paul, so our own adversaries [Luther’s, the enemies of the
Reformation] contend that the traditions of the Fathers dare not be neglected
without loss of salvation. Our opponents will not agree with us on anything.
They defend their blasphemies. They go as far to enforce them with the sword.

Paul’s victory was complete. Titus, who was with Paul, was not compelled to
be circumcised, although he stood in the midst of the apostles when this
question of circumcision was debated. This was a blow to the false apostles.
With the living fact that Titus was not compelled to be circumcised Paul was
able to squelch his adversaries.

  VERSES 4,5. And that because of false brethren unawares brought in,
  who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ
  Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage: To whom we gave place by
  subjection, no, not for an hour; that the truth of the gospel might
  continue with you.

Paul here explains his motive for going up to Jerusalem. He did not go to
Jerusalem to be instructed or confirmed in his Gospel by the other apostles.
He went to Jerusalem in order to preserve the true Gospel for the Galatian
churches and for all the churches of the Gentiles.

When Paul speaks of the truth of the Gospel he implies by contrast a false
gospel. The false apostles also had a gospel, but it was an untrue gospel.
“In holding out against them,” says Paul, “I conserved the truth of the pure

Now the true Gospel has it that we are justified by faith alone, without the
deeds of the Law. The false gospel has it that we are justified by faith, but
not without the deeds of the Law. The false apostles preached a conditional

So do the papists. They admit that faith is the foundation of salvation. But
they add the conditional clause that faith can save only when it is furnished
with good works. This is wrong. The true Gospel declares that good works are
the embellishment of faith, but that faith itself is the gift and work of God
in our hearts. Faith is able to justify, because it apprehends Christ, the

Human reason can think only in terms of the Law. It mumbles: “This I have
done, this I have not done.” But faith looks to Jesus Christ, the Son of God,
given into death for the sins of the whole world. To turn one’s eyes away
from Jesus means to turn them to the Law.

True faith lays hold of Christ and leans on Him alone. Our opponents cannot
understand this. In their blindness they cast away the precious pearl,
Christ, and hang onto their stubborn works. They have no idea what faith is.
How can they teach faith to others?

Not satisfied with teaching an untrue gospel, the false apostles tried to
entangle Paul. “They went about,” says Paul, “to spy out our liberty which we
have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage.”

When Paul saw through their scheme, he attacked the false apostles. He says,
“We did not let go of the liberty which we have in Christ Jesus. We routed
them by the judgment of the apostles, and we would not give in to them, no,
not an inch.”

We too were willing to make all kinds of concessions to the papists. Yes, we
are willing to offer them more than we should. But we will not give up the
liberty of conscience which we have in Christ Jesus. We refuse to have our
conscience bound by any work or law, so that by doing this or that we should
be righteous, or leaving this or that undone we should be damned.

Since our opponents will not let it stand that only faith in Christ
justifies, we will not yield to them. On the question of justification we
must remain adamant, or else we shall lose the truth of the Gospel. It is a
matter of life and death. It involves the death of the Son of God, who died
for the sins of the world. If we surrender faith in Christ, as the only thing
that can justify us, the death and resurrection of Jesus are without meaning;
that Christ is the Savior of the world would be a myth. God would be a liar,
because He would not have fulfilled His promises. Our stubbornness is right,
because we want to preserve the liberty which we have in Christ. Only by
preserving our liberty shall we be able to retain the truth of the Gospel

Some will object that the Law is divine and holy. Let it be divine and holy.
The Law has no right to tell me that I must be justified by it. The Law has
the right to tell me that I should love God and my neighbor, that I should
live in chastity, temperance, patience, etc. The Law has no right to tell me
how I may be delivered from sin, death, and hell. It is the Gospel’s business
to tell me that. I must listen to the Gospel. It tells me, not what I must
do, but what Jesus Christ, the Son of God, has done for me.

To conclude, Paul refused to circumcise Titus for the reason that the false
apostles wanted to compel him to circumcise Titus. Paul refused to accede to
their demands. If they had asked it on the plea of brotherly love, Paul would
not have denied them. But because they demanded it on the ground that it was
necessary for salvation, Paul defied them, and prevailed. Titus was not

  VERSE 6. But of those who seemed to be somewhat, whatsoever they
  were, it maketh no matter to me.

This is a good point in Paul’s refutation. Paul disparages the authority and
dignity of the true apostles. He says of them, “Which seemed to be somewhat.”
The authority of the apostles was indeed great in all the churches. Paul did
not want to detract from their authority, but he had to speak disparagingly
of their authority in order to conserve the truth of the Gospel, and the
liberty of conscience.

The false apostles used this argument against Paul: “The apostles lived with
Christ for three years. They heard His sermons. They witnessed His miracles.
They themselves preached and performed miracles while Christ was on earth.
Paul never saw Jesus in the flesh. Now, whom ought you to believe: Paul, who
stands alone, a mere disciple of the apostles, one of the last and least; or
will you believe those grand apostles who were sent and confirmed by Christ
Himself long before Paul?”

What could Paul say to that? He answered: “What they say has no bearing on
the argument. If the apostles were angels from heaven, that would not impress
me. We are not now discussing the excellency of the apostles. We are talking
about the Word of God now, and the truth of the Gospel. That Gospel is more
excellent than all apostles.

  VERSE 6. God accepteth no man’s person.

Paul is quoting Moses: “Thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor
honor the person of the mighty.” (Lev. 19:15) This quotation from Moses ought
to shut the mouths of the false apostles. “Don’t you know that God is no
respecter of persons?” cries Paul. The dignity or authority of men means
nothing to God. The fact is that God often rejects just such who stand in the
odor of sanctity and in the aura of importance. In doing so God seems unjust
and harsh. But men need deterring examples. For it is a vice with us to
esteem personality more highly than the Word of God. God wants us to exalt
His Word and not men.

There must be people in high office, of course. But we are not to deify them.
The governor, the mayor, the preacher, the teacher, the scholar, father,
mother, are persons whom we are to love and revere, but not to the extent
that we forget God. Least we attach too much importance to the person, God
leaves with important persons offenses and sins, sometimes astounding
shortcomings, to show us that there is a lot of difference between any person
and God. David was a good king. But when the people began to think too well
of him, down he fell into horrible sins, adultery and murder. Peter,
excellent apostle that he was, denied Christ. Such examples of which the
Scriptures are full, ought to warn us not to repose our trust in men. In the
papacy appearance counts for everything. Indeed, the whole papacy amounts to
nothing more than a mere kowtowing of persons and outward mummery. But God
alone is to be feared and honored.

I would honor the Pope, I would love his person, if he would leave my
conscience alone, and not compel me to sin against God. But the Pope wants to
be adored himself, and that cannot be done without offending God. Since we
must choose between one or the other, let us choose God. The truth is we are
commissioned by God to resist the Pope, for it is written, “We ought to obey
God rather than men.” (Acts 5:29)

We have seen how Paul refutes the argument of the false apostles concerning
the authority of the apostles. In order that the truth of the Gospel may
continue; in order that the Word of God and the righteousness of faith may be
kept pure and undefiled, let the apostles, let an angel from heaven, let
Peter, let Paul, let them all perish.

  VERSE 6. For they who seemed to be somewhat in conference added
  nothing to me.

The Apostle repeats: “I did not so confer with the apostles that they taught
me anything. What could they possibly teach me since Christ by His revelation
had taught me all things? It was but a conference, and no disputation. I
learned nothing, neither did I defend my cause. I only stated what I had
done, that I had preached to the Gentiles faith in Christ, without the Law,
and that in response to my preaching the Holy Ghost came down upon the
Gentiles. When the apostles heard this, they were glad that I had taught the

If Paul would not give in to the false apostles, much less ought we to give
in to our opponents. I know that a Christian should be humble, but against
the Pope I am going to be proud and say to him: “You, Pope, I will not have
you for my boss, for I am sure that my doctrine is divine.” Such pride
against the Pope is imperative, for if we are not stout and proud we shall
never succeed in defending the article of the righteousness of faith.

If the Pope would concede that God alone by His grace through Christ
justifies sinners, we would carry him in our arms, we would kiss his feet.
But since we cannot obtain this concession, we will give in to nobody, not to
all the angels in heaven, not to Peter, not to Paul, not to a hundred
emperors, not to a thousand popes, not to the whole world. If in this matter
we were to humble ourselves, they would take from us the God who created us,
and Jesus Christ who has redeemed us by His blood. Let this be our
resolution, that we will suffer the loss of all things, the loss of our good
name, of life itself, but the Gospel and our faith in Jesus Christ–we will
not stand for it that anybody take them from us.

  VERSES 7, 8. But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the
  uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision
  was unto Peter; [For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the
  apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the

Here the Apostle claims for himself the same authority which the false
apostles attributed to the true apostles. Paul simply inverts their argument.
“to bolster their evil cause,” says he, “the false apostles quote the
authority of the great apostles against me. I can quote the same authority
against them, for the apostles are on my side. They gave me the right hand of
fellowship. They approved my ministry. O my Galatians, do not believe the
counterfeit apostles!”

What does Paul mean by saying that the gospel of the uncircumcision was
committed unto him, and that of the circumcision to Peter? Did not Paul
preach to the Jews, while Peter preached to the Gentiles also? Peter
converted the Centurion. Paul’s custom was to enter into the synagogues of
the Jews, there to preach the Gospel. Why then should he call himself the
apostle of the Gentiles, while he calls Peter the apostle of the

Paul refers to the fact that the other apostles remained in Jerusalem until
the destruction of the city became imminent. But Paul was especially called
the apostle of the Gentiles. Even before the destruction of Jerusalem Jews
dwelt here and there in the cities of the Gentiles. Coming to a city, Paul
customarily entered the synagogues of the Jews and first brought to them as
the children of the kingdom, the glad tidings that the promises made unto the
fathers were fulfilled in Jesus Christ. When the Jews refused to hear these
glad tidings, Paul turned to the Gentiles. He was the apostle of the Gentiles
in a special sense, as Peter was the apostle of the Jews.

Paul reiterates that Peter, James, and John, the accepted pillars of the
Church, taught him nothing, nor did they commit unto him the office of
preaching the Gospel unto the Gentiles. Both the knowledge of the Gospel and
the commandment to preach it to the Gentiles, Paul received directly from
God. His case was parallel to that of Peter’s, who was particularly
commissioned to preach the Gospel to the Jews.

The apostles had the same charge, the identical Gospel. Peter did not
proclaim a different Gospel, nor had he appointed his fellow apostles. They
were equals. They were all taught of God. None was greater than the other,
none could point to prerogatives above the other. To justify his usurped
primacy in the Church the Pope claims that Peter was the chief of the
apostles. This is an impudent falsehood.

  VERSE 8. For he that wrought effectually in Peter.

With these words Paul refutes another argument of the false apostles. “What
reason have the false apostles to boast that the Gospel of Peter was mighty,
that he converted many, that he wrought great miracles, and that his very
shadow healed the sick? These reports are true enough. But where did Peter
acquire this power? God gave him the power. I have the same power. I received
my power, not from Peter, but from the same God, the same Spirit who was
mighty in Peter was mighty in me also.” Luke corroborates Paul’s statement in
the words: “And God wrought special miracles by the hands of Paul, so that
from his body were brought unto the sick handkerchiefs or aprons, and the
diseases departed from them, and the evil spirits went out of them.” (Acts
19:11, 12.)

To conclude, Paul is not going to be inferior to the rest of the apostles.
Some secular writers put Paul’s boasting down as carnal pride. But Paul had
no personal interest in his boasting. It was with him a matter of faith and
doctrine. The controversy was not about the glory of Paul, but the glory of
God, the Word of God, the true worship of God, true religion, and the
righteousness of faith.

  VERSE 9. And when James, Cephas and John, who seemed to be pillars,
  perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and
  Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the
  heathen, and they unto the circumcision.

“The fact is, when the apostles heard that I had received the charge to
preach the Gospel to the Gentiles from Christ; when they heard that God had
wrought many miracles through me; that great numbers of the Gentiles had come
to the knowledge of Christ through my ministry; when they heard that the
Gentiles had received the Holy Ghost without Law and circumcision, by the
simple preaching of faith; when they heard all this they glorified God for
His grace in me.” Hence, Paul was justified in concluding that the apostles
were for him, and not against him.

  VERSE 9. The right hands of fellowship.

As if the apostles had said to him: “We, Paul, do agree with you in all
things. We are companions in doctrine. We have the same Gospel with this
difference, that to you is committed the Gospel for the uncircumcised, while
the Gospel for the circumcision is committed unto us. But this difference
ought not to hinder our friendship, since we preach one and the same Gospel.”

  VERSE 10. Only they would that we should remember the poor; the same
  which I also was forward to do.

Next to the preaching of the Gospel, a true and faithful pastor will take
care of the poor. Where the Church is, there must be the poor, for the world
and the devil persecute the Church and impoverish many faithful Christians.

Speaking of money, nobody wants to contribute nowadays to the maintenance of
the ministry, and the erection of schools. When it comes to establishing
false worship and idolatry, no cost is spared. True religion is ever in need
of money, while false religions are backed by wealth.

  VERSE 11. But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the
  face, because he was to be blamed.

Paul goes on in his refutation of the false apostles by saying that in
Antioch he withstood Peter in the presence of the whole congregation. As he
stated before, Paul had no small matter in hand, but the chief article of the
Christian religion. When this article is endangered, we must not hesitate to
resist Peter, or an angel from heaven. Paul paid no regard to the dignity and
position of Peter, when he saw this article in danger. It is written: “He
that loveth father or mother or his own life, more than me, is not worthy of
me.” (Matt. 10:37.)

For defending the truth in our day, we are called proud and obstinate
hypocrites. We are not ashamed of these titles. The cause we are called to
defend, is not Peter’s cause, or the cause of our parents, or that of the
government, or that of the world, but the cause of God. In defense of that
cause we must be firm and unyielding.

When he says, “to his face,” Paul accuses the false apostles of slandering
him behind his back. In his presence they dared not to open their mouths. He
tells them, “I did not speak evil of Peter behind his back, but I withstood
him frankly and openly.”

Others may debate here whether an apostle might sin. I claim that we ought
not to make Peter out as faultless. Prophets have erred. Nathan told David
that he should go ahead and build the Temple of the Lord. But his prophecy
was afterwards corrected by the Lord. The apostles erred in thinking of the
Kingdom of Christ as a worldly state. Peter had heard the command of Christ,
“Go ye into all the world, and preach the Gospel to every creature.” But if
it had not been for the heavenly vision and the special command of Christ,
Peter would never have gone to the home of Cornelius. Peter also erred in
this matter of circumcision. If Paul had not publicly censured him, all the
believing Gentiles would have been compelled to receive circumcision and
accept the Jewish law. We are not to attribute perfection to any man.

Luke reports “that the contention between Paul and Barnabas was so sharp that
they departed asunder one from the other.” The cause of their disagreement
could hardly have been small since it separated these two, who had been
joined together for years in a holy partnership. Such incidents are recorded
for our consolation. After all, it is a comfort to know that even saints
might and do sin.

Samson, David, and many other excellent men, fell into grievous sins. Job and
Jeremiah cursed the day of their birth. Elijah and Jonah became weary of life
and prayed for death. Such offenses on the part of the saints, the Scriptures
record for the comfort of those who are near despair. No person has ever sunk
so low that he cannot rise again. On the other hand, no man’s standing is so
secure that he may not fall. If Peter fell, I may fall. If he rose again, I
may rise again. We have the same gifts that they had, the same Christ, the
same baptism and the same Gospel, the same forgiveness of sins. They needed
these saving ordinances just as much as we do.

  VERSE 12. For before that certain came from James, he did eat with the

The Gentiles who had been converted to faith in Christ, ate meats forbidden
by the Law. Peter, visiting some of these Gentiles, ate meat and drank wine
with them, although he knew that these things were forbidden in the Law. Paul
declared that he did likewise, that he became as a Jew to the Jews, and to
them that were without law, as without law. He ate and drank with the
Gentiles unconcerned about the Jewish Law. When he was with the Jews,
however, he abstained from all things forbidden in the Law, for he labored to
serve all men, that he “might by all means save some.” Paul does not reprove
Peter for transgressing the Law, but for disguising his attitude to the Law.

  VERSE 12. But when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself,
  fearing them which were of the circumcision.

Paul does not accuse Peter of malice or ignorance, but of lack of principle,
in that he abstained from meats, because he feared the Jews that came from
James. Peter’s weak attitude endangered the principle of Christian liberty.
It is the deduction rather than the fact which Paul reproves. To eat and to
drink, or not to eat and drink, is immaterial. But to make the deduction “If
you eat, you sin; if you abstain you are righteous”–this is wrong.

Meats may be refused for two reasons. First, they may be refused for the sake
of Christian love. There is no danger connected with a refusal of meats for
the sake of charity. To bear with the infirmity of a brother is a good thing.
Paul himself taught and exemplified such thoughtfulness. Secondly, meats may
be refused in the mistaken hope of thereby obtaining righteousness. When this
is the purpose of abstaining from meats, we say, let charity go. To refrain
from meats for this latter reason amounts to a denial of Christ. If we must
lose one or the other, let us lose a friend and brother, rather than God, our

Jerome, who understood not this passage, nor the whole epistle for that
matter, excuses Peter’s action on the ground “that it was done in ignorance.”
But Peter offended by giving the impression that he was indorsing the Law. By
his example he encouraged Gentiles and Jews to forsake the truth of the
Gospel. If Paul had not reproved him, there would have been a sliding back of
Christians into the Jewish religion, and a return to the burdens of the Law.

It is surprising that Peter, excellent apostle that he was, should have been
guilty of such vacillation. In a former council at Jerusalem he practically
stood alone in defense of the truth that salvation is by faith, without the
Law. Peter at that time valiantly defended the liberty of the Gospel. But now
by abstaining from meats forbidden in the Law, he went against his better
judgment. You have no idea what danger there is in customs and ceremonies.
They so easily tend to error in works.

  VERSE 13. And the other Jews dissembled likewise with him; insomuch
  that Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation.

It is marvelous how God preserved the Church by one single person. Paul alone
stood up for the truth, for Barnabas, his companion, was lost to him, and
Peter was against him. Sometimes one lone person can do more in a conference
than the whole assembly.

I mention this to urge all to learn how properly to differentiate between the
Law and the Gospel, in order to avoid dissembling. When it come to the
article of justification we must not yield, if we want to retain the truth of
the Gospel.

When the conscience is disturbed, do not seek advice from reason or from the
Law, but rest your conscience in the grace of God and in His Word, and
proceed as if you had never heard of the Law. The Law has its place and its
own good time. While Moses was in the mountain where he talked with God face
to face, he had no law, he made no law, he administered no law. But when he
came down from the mountain, he was a lawgiver. The conscience must be kept
above the Law, the body under the Law.

Paul reproved Peter for no trifle, but for the chief article of Christian
doctrine, which Peter’s hypocrisy had endangered. For Barnabas and other Jews
followed Peter’s example. It is surprising that such good men as Peter,
Barnabas, and others should fall into unexpected error, especially in a
matter which they knew so well. To trust in our own strength, our own
goodness, our own wisdom, is a perilous thing. Let us search the Scriptures
with humility, praying that we may never lose the light of the Gospel. “Lord,
increase our faith.”

  VERSE 14. But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to
  the truth of the gospel.

No one except Paul had his eyes open. Consequently it was his duty to
reprove Peter and his followers for swerving from the truth of the Gospel. It
was no easy task for Paul to reprimand Peter. To the honor of Peter it must
be said that he took the correction. No doubt, he freely acknowledged his

The person who can rightly divide Law and Gospel has reason to thank God. He
is a true theologian. I must confess that in times of temptation I do not
always know how to do it. To divide Law and Gospel means to place the
Gospel in heaven, and to keep the Law on earth; to call the righteousness of
the Gospel heavenly, and the righteousness of the Law earthly; to put as much
difference between the righteousness of the Gospel and that of the Law, as
there is difference between day and night. If it is a question of faith or
conscience, ignore the Law entirely. If it is a question of works, then lift
high the lantern of works and the righteousness of the Law. If your
conscience is oppressed with a sense of sin, talk to your conscience. Say:
“You are now groveling in the dirt. You are now a laboring ass. Go ahead, and
carry your burden. But why don’t you mount up to heaven? There the Law
cannot follow you!” Leave the ass burdened with laws behind in the valley.
But your conscience, let it ascend with Isaac into the mountain.

In civil life obedience to the law is severely required. In civil life Gospel,
conscience, grace, remission of sins, Christ Himself, do not count, but only
Moses with the lawbooks. If we bear in mind this distinction, neither Gospel
nor Law shall trespass upon each other. The moment Law and sin cross into
heaven, i.e., your conscience, kick them out. On the other hand, when grace
wanders unto the earth, i.e., into the body, tell grace: “You have no business
to be around the dreg and dung of this bodily life. You belong in heaven.”

By his compromising attitude Peter confused the separation of Law and
Gospel. Paul had to do something about it. He reproved Peter, not to
embarrass him, but to conserve the difference between the Gospel which
justifies in heaven, and the Law which justifies on earth.

The right separation between Law and Gospel is very important to know.
Christian doctrine is impossible without it. Let all who love and fear God,
diligently learn the difference, not only in theory but also in practice.

When your conscience gets into trouble, say to yourself: “There is a time to
die, and a time to live; a time to learn the Law, and a time to unlearn the
Law; a time to hear the Gospel, and a time to ignore the Gospel. Let the Law
now depart, and let the Gospel enter, for now is the right time to hear the
Gospel, and not the Law.” However, when the conflict of conscience is over
and external duties must be performed, close your ears to the Gospel, and
open them wide to the Law.

  VERSE 14. I said unto Peter before them all, If thou being a Jew, livest
  after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest
  thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews

To live as a Jew is nothing bad. To eat or not to eat pork, what difference
does it make? But to play the Jew, and for conscience’ sake to abstain from
certain meats, is a denial of Christ. When Paul saw that Peter’s attitude
tended to this, he withstood Peter and said to him: “You know that the
observance of the Iaw is not needed unto righteousness. You know that we are
justified by faith in Christ. You know that we may eat all kinds of meats. Yet
by your example you obligate the Gentiles to forsake Christ, and to return to
the Law. You give them reason to think that faith is not sufficient unto

Peter did not say so, but his example said quite plainly that the observance
of the Law must be added to faith in Christ, if men are to be saved. From
Peter’s example the Gentiles could not help but draw the conclusion that the
Law was necessary unto salvation. If this error had been permitted to pass
unchallenged, Christ would have lost out altogether.

The controversy involved the preservation of pure doctrine. In such a
controversy Paul did not mind if anybody took offense.

  VERSE 15. We who are Jews by nature, and not sinners of the Gentiles.

“When we Jews compare ourselves with the Gentiles, we look pretty good.
We have the Law, we have good works. Our rectitude dates from our birth,
because the Jewish religion is natural to us. But all this does not make us
righteous before God.”
Peter and the others lived up to the requirements of the Law. They had
circumcision, the covenant, the promises, the apostleship. But because of
these advantages they were not to think themselves righteous before God.
None of these prerogatives spell faith in Christ, which alone can justify a
person. We do not mean to imply that the Law is bad. We do not condemn the
Law, circumcision, etc., for their failure to justify us. Paul spoke
disparagingly of these ordinances, because the false apostles asserted that
mankind is saved by them without faith. Paul could not let this assertion
stand, for without faith all things are deadly.

  VERSE 16. Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law,
  but by the faith of Jesus Christ.

For the sake of argument let us suppose that you could fulfill the Law in the
spirit of the first commandment of God: “Thou shalt love the Lord, thy God,
with all thy heart.” It would do you no good. A person simply is not justified
by the works of the Law.

The works of the Law, according to Paul, include the whole Law, judicial,
ceremonial, moral. Now, if the performance of the moral law cannot justify,
how can circumcision justify, when circumcision is part of the ceremonial

The demands of the Law may be fulfilled before and after justification.
There were many excellent men among the pagans of old, men who never
heard of justification. They lived moral lives. But that fact did not justify
them. Peter, Paul, all Christians, live up to the Law. But that fact does not
justify them. “For I know nothing by myself,” says Paul, “yet am I not hereby
justified.” (I Cor. 4:4.)

The nefarious opinion of the papists, which attributes the merit of grace and
the remission of sins to works, must here be emphatically rejected. The
papists say that a good work performed before grace has been obtained, is
able to secure grace for a person, because it is no more than right that God
should reward a good deed. When grace has already been obtained, any good
work deserves everlasting life as a due payment and reward for merit. For
the first, God is no debtor, they say; but because God is good and just, it is no
more than right (they say) that He should reward a good work by granting
grace for the service. But when grace has already been obtained, they
continue, God is in the position of a debtor, and is in duty bound to reward a
good work with the gift of eternal life. This is the wicked teaching of the

Now, if I could perform any work acceptable to God and deserving of grace,
and once having obtained grace my good works would continue to earn for me
the right and reward of eternal life, why should I stand in need of the grace
of God and the suffering and death of Christ? Christ would be of no benefit to
me. Christ’s mercy would be of no use to me.

This shows how little insight the pope and the whole of his religious coterie
have into spiritual matters, and how little they concern themselves with the
spiritual health of their forlorn flocks. They cannot believe that the flesh is
unable to think, speak, or do anything except against God. If they could see
evil rooted in the nature of man, they would never entertain such silly
dreams about man’s merit or worthiness.

With Paul we absolutely deny the possibility of self merit. God never yet
gave to any person grace and everlasting life as a reward for merit. The
opinions of the papists are the intellectual pipe-dreams of idle pates, that
serve no other purpose but to draw men away from the true worship of God.
The papacy is founded upon hallucinations.

The true way of salvation is this. First, a person must realize that he is a
sinner, the kind of a sinner who is congenitally unable to do any good thing.
“Whatsoever is not of faith, is sin.” Those who seek to earn the grace of God
by their own efforts are trying to please God with sins. They mock God, and
provoke His anger. The first step on the way to salvation is to repent.

The second part is this. God sent His only-begotten Son into the world that
we may live through His merit. He was crucified and killed for us. By
sacrificing His Son for us God revealed Himself to us as a merciful Father
who donates remission of sins, righteousness, and life everlasting for
Christ’s sake. God hands out His gifts freely unto all men. That is the praise
and glory of His mercy.

The scholastics explain the way of salvation in this manner. When a person
happens to perform a good deed, God accepts it and as a reward for the good
deed God pours charity into that person. They call it “charity infused.” This
charity is supposed to remain in the heart. They get wild when they are told
that this quality of the heart cannot justify a person.

They also claim that we are able to love God by our own natural strength, to
love God above all things, at least to the extent that we deserve grace. And,
say the scholastics, because God is not satisfied with a literal performance
of the Law, but expects us to fulfill the Law according to the mind of the
Lawgiver, therefore we must obtain from above a quality above nature, a
quality which they call “formal righteousness.”

We say, faith apprehends Jesus Christ. Christian faith is not an inactive
quality in the heart. If it is true faith it will surely take Christ for its
object. Christ, apprehended by faith and dwelling in the heart, constitutes
Christian righteousness, for which God gives eternal life.

In contrast to the doting dreams of the scholastics, we teach this: First a
person must learn to know himself from the Law. With the prophet he will
then confess: “All have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.” And,
“there is none that doeth good, no, not one.” And, “against thee, thee only,
have I sinned.”

Having been humbled by the Law, and having been brought to a right estimate
of himself, a man will repent. He finds out that he is so depraved, that no
strength, no works, no merits of his own will ever deliver him from his guilt.
He will then understand the meaning of Paul’s words: “I am sold under sin”;
and “they are all under sin.”

At this state a person begins to lament: “Who is going to help me?” In due
time comes the Word of the Gospel, and says: “Son, thy sins are forgiven thee.
Believe in Jesus Christ who was crucified for your sins. Remember, your sins
have been imposed upon Christ.”

In this way are we delivered from sin. In this way are we justified and made
heirs of everlasting life.

In order to have faith you must paint a true portrait of Christ. The
scholastics caricature Christ into a judge and tormentor. But Christ is no law
giver. He is the Lifegiver. He is the Forgiver of sins. You must believe that
Christ might have atoned for the sins of the world with one single drop of His
blood. Instead, He shed His blood abundantly in order that He might give
abundant satisfaction for our sins.

Here let me say, that these three things, faith, Christ, and imputation of
righteousness, are to be joined together. Faith takes hold of Christ. God
accounts this faith for righteousness.

This imputation of righteousness we need very much, because we are far
from perfect. As long as we have this body, sin will dwell in our flesh. Then,
too, we sometimes drive away the Holy Spirit; we fall into sin, like Peter,
David, and other holy men. Nevertheless we may always take recourse to this
fact, “that our sins are covered,” and that “God will not lay them to our
charge.” Sin is not held against us for Christ’s sake. Where Christ and faith
are lacking, there is no remission or covering of sins, but only condemnation.

After we have taught faith in Christ, we teach good works. “Since you have
found Christ by faith,” we say, “begin now to work and do well. Love God and
your neighbor. Call upon God, give thanks unto Him, praise Him, confess Him.
These are good works. Let them flow from a cheerful heart, because you have
remission of sin in Christ.”

When crosses and afflictions come our way, we bear them patiently. “For
Christ’s yoke is easy, and His burden is light.” When sin has been pardoned,
and the conscience has been eased of its dreadful load, a Christian can endure
all things in Christ.

To give a short definition of a Christian: A Christian is not somebody chalks
sin, because of his faith in Christ. This doctrine brings comfort to
consciences in serious trouble. When a person is a Christian he is above law
and sin. When the Law accuses him, and sin wants to drive the wits out of
him, a Christian looks to Christ. A Christian is free. He has no master except
Christ. A Christian is greater than the whole world.

  VERSE 16. Even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be

The true way of becoming a Christian is to be justified by faith in Jesus
Christ, and not by the works of the Law.

We know that we must also teach good works, but they must be taught in
their proper turn, when the discussion is concerning works and not the
article of justification.

Here the question arises by what means are we justified? We answer with
Paul, “By faith only in Christ are we pronounced righteous, and not by works.”
Not that we reject good works. Far from it. But we will not allow ourselves
to be removed from the anchorage of our salvation.

The Law is a good thing. But when the discussion is about justification, then
is no time to drag in the Law. When we discuss justification we ought to
speak of Christ and the benefits He has brought us.

Christ is no sheriff. He is “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the
world.” (John 1:29.)

  VERSE 16. That we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by
  the works of the Law.

We do not mean to say that the Law is bad. Only it is not able to justify us.
To be at peace with God, we have need of a far better mediator than Moses or
the Law. We must know that we are nothing. We must understand that we are
merely beneficiaries and recipients of the treasures of Christ.

So far, the words of Paul were addressed to Peter. Now Paul turns to the
Galatians and makes this summary statement:

  VERSE 16. For by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

By the term “flesh” Paul does not understand manifest vices. Such sins he
usually calls by their proper names, as adultery, fornication, etc. By “flesh”
Paul understands what Jesus meant in the third chapter of John, “That which
is born of the flesh is flesh”. (John 3:6.) “Flesh” here means the whole nature
of man, inclusive of reason and instincts. “This flesh,” says Paul, “is not
justified by the works of the law.”

The papists do not believe this. They say, “A person who performs this good
deed or that, deserves the forgiveness of his sins. A person who joins this or
that holy order, has the promise of everlasting life.”

To me it is a miracle that the Church, so long surrounded by vicious sects,
has been able to survive at all. God must have been able to call a few who in
their failure to discover any good in themselves to cite against the wrath and
judgment of God, simply took to the suffering and death of Christ, and were
saved by this simple faith.

Nevertheless God has punished the contempt of the Gospel and of Christ on
the part of the papists, by turning them over to a reprobatestate of mind in
which they reject the Gospel, and receive with gusto the abominable rules,
ordinances, and traditions of men in preference to the Word of God, until they
went so far as to forbid marriage. God punished them justly, because they
blasphemed the only Son of God.

This is, then, our general conclusion: “By the works of the law shall no flesh
be justified.”

  VERSE 17. But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves
  also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? God

Either we are not justified by Christ, or we are not justified by the Law. The
fact is, we are justified by Christ. Hence, we are not justified by the Law.
If we observe the Law in order to be justified, or after having been justified
by Christ, we think we must further be justified by the Law, we convert
Christ into a legislator and a minister of sin.

“What are these false apostles doing?” Paul cries. “They are turning Law
into grace, and grace into Law. They are changing Moses into Christ, and
Christ into Moses. By teaching that besides Christ and His righteousness
the performance of the Law is necessary unto salvation, they put the Law
in the place of Christ, they attribute to the Law the power to save, a power
that belongs to Christ only.”

The papists quote the words of Christ: “If thou wilt enter into life, keep the
commandments.” (Matt. 19:17.) With His own words they deny Christ and
abolish faith in Him. Christ is made to lose His good name, His office, and
His glory, and is demoted to the status of a law enforcer, reproving,
terrifying, and chasing poor sinners around.

The proper office of Christ is to raise the sinner, and extricate him from
his sins.

Papists and Anabaptists deride us because we so earnestly require faith.
“Faith,” they say, “makes men reckless.” What do these law-workers know
about faith, when they are so busy calling people back from baptism, from
faith, from the promises of Christ to the Law?

With their doctrine these lying sects of perdition deface the benefits of
Christ to this day. They rob Christ of His glory as the Justifier of mankind
and cast Him into the role of a minister of sin. They are like the false
apostles. There is not a single one among them who knows the difference
between law and grace.

We can tell the difference. We do not here and now argue whether we
ought to do good works, or whether the Law is any good, or whether the
Law ought to be kept at all. We will discuss these questions some other
time. We are now concerned with justification. Our opponents refuse to
make this distinction. All they can do is to bellow that good works ought
to be done. We know that. We know that good works ought to be done,
but we will talk about that when the proper time comes. Now we are
dealing with justification, and here good works should not be so much as

Paul’s argument has often comforted me. He argues: “If we who have
been justified by Christ are counted unrighteous, why seek justification in
Christ at all? If we are justified by the Law, tell me, what has Christ
achieved by His death, by His preaching, by His victory over sin and death?
Either we are justified by Christ, or we are made worse sinners by Him.”

The Sacred Scriptures, particularly those of the New Testament, make
frequent mention of faith in Christ. “Whosoever believeth in him is
saved, shall not perish, shall have everlasting life, is not judged,” etc. In
open contradiction to the Scriptures, our opponents misquote, “He that
believeth in Christ is condemned, because he has faith without works.”
Our opponents turn everything topsy-turvy. They make Christ over into a
murderer, and Moses into a savior. Is not this horrible blasphemy?

  VERSE 17. Is therefore Christ the minister of sin?

This is Hebrew phraseology, also used by Paul in II Corinthians, chapter 3.
There Paul speaks of two ministers: The minister of the letter, and the
minister of the spirit; the minister of the Law, and the minister of grace;
the minister of death, and the minister of life. “Moses,” says Paul, “is the
minister of the Law, of sin, wrath, death, and condemnation.”

Whoever teaches that good works are indispensable unto salvation, that
to gain heaven a person must suffer afflictions and follow the example of
Christ and of the saints, is a minister of the Law, of sin, wrath, and of
death, for the conscience knows how impossible it is for a person to fulfill
the Law. Why, the Law makes trouble even for those who have the Holy
Spirit. What will not the Law do in the case of the wicked who do not
even have the Holy Spirit?

The Law requires perfect obedience. It condemns all do not accomplish the
will of God. But show me a person who is able to render perfect obedience.
The Law cannot justify. It can only condemn according to the passage:
“Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in
the book of the law to do them.”

Paul has good reason for calling the minister of the Law the minister of
sin, for the Law reveals our sinfulness. The realization of sin in turn
frightens the heart and drives it to despair. Therefore all exponents of the
Law and of works deserve to be called tyrants and oppressors.

The purpose of the Law is to reveal sin. That this is the purpose of the
Law can be seen from the account of the giving of the Law as reported in
the nineteenth and twentieth chapters of Exodus. Moses brought the
people out of their tents to have God speak to them personally from a
cloud. But the people trembled with fear, fled, and standing aloof they
begged Moses: “Speak thou with us, and we will hear: but let not God
speak with us, lest we die.” The proper office of the Law is to lead us out
of our tents, in other words, out of the security of our self-trust, into the
presence of God, that we may perceive His anger at our sinfulness.

All who say that faith alone in Christ does not justify a person, convert
Christ into a minister of sin, a teacher of the Law, and a cruel tyrant who
requires the impossible. All merit-seekers take Christ for a new lawgiver.

In conclusion, if the Law is the minister of sin, it is at the same time the
minister of wrath and death. As the Law reveals sin it fills a person with
the fear of death and condemnation. Eventually the conscience wakes up
to the fact that God is angry. If God is angry with you, He will destroy and
condemn you forever. Unable to stand the thought of the wrath and
judgment of God, many a person commits suicide.

  VERSE 17. God forbid.

Christ is not the minister of sin, but the Dispenser of righteousness and
the Giver of life. Christ is Lord over law, sin and death. All who believe in
Him are delivered from law, sin and death.

The Law drives us away from God, but Christ reconciles God unto us, for
“He is the Lamb of God, that taketh away the sins of the world.” Now if
the sin of the world is taken away, it is taken away from me. If sin is taken
away, the wrath of God and His condemnation are also taken away. Let us
practice this blessed conviction.

  VERSE 18. For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make
  myself a transgressor.

“I have not preached to the end that I build again the things which I
destroyed. If I should do so, I would not only be laboring in vain, but I
would make myself guilty of a great wrong. By the ministry of the Gospel
I have destroyed sin, heaviness of heart, wrath, and death. I have
abolished the Law, so that it should not bother your conscience any more.
Should I now once again establish the Law, and set up the rule of Moses?
This is exactly what I should be doing, if I would urge circumcision and
the performance of the Law as necessary unto salvation. Instead of
righteousness and life, I would restore sin and death.”

By the grace of God we know that we are justified through faith in Christ
alone. We do not mingle law and grace, faith and works. We keep them
far apart. Let every true Christian mark the distinction between law and
grace, and mark it well.

We must not drag good works into the article of justification as the monks
do who maintain that not only good works, but also the punishment
which evildoers suffer for their wicked deeds, deserve everlasting life.
When a criminal is brought to the place of execution, the monks try to
comfort him in this manner: “You want to die willingly and patiently,
and then you will merit remission of your sins and eternal life.” What
cruelty is this, that a wretched thief, murderer, robber should be so
miserably misguided in his extreme distress, that at the very point of
death he should be denied the sweet promises of Christ, and directed to
hope for pardon of his sins in the willingness and patience with which he
is about to suffer death for his crimes? The monks are showing him the
paved way to hell.

These hypocrites do not know the first thing about grace, the Gospel, or
Christ. They retain the appearance and the name of the Gospel and of
Christ for a decoy only. In their confessional writings faith or the merit of
Christ are never mentioned. In their writings they play up the merits of
man, as can readily be seen from the following form of absolution used
among the monks.

  “God forgive thee, brother. The merit of the passion of our Lord Jesus
  Christ, and of the blessed Saint Mary, always a virgin, and of all the
  saints; the merit of thy order, the strictness of thy religion, the
  humility of thy profession, the contrition of thy heart, the good works
  thou hast done and shalt do for the love of our Lord Jesus Christ, be
  available unto thee for the remission of thy sins, the increase of thy
  worth and grace, and the reward of everlasting life. Amen.”

True, the merit of Christ is mentioned in this formula of absolution. But if
you look closer you will notice that Christ’s merit is belittled, while
monkish merits are aggrandized. They confess Christ with their lips, and
at the same time deny His power to save. I myself was at one time
entangled in this error. I thought Christ was a judge and had to be pacified
by a strict adherence to the rules of my order. But now I give thanks unto
God, the Father of all mercies, who has called me out of darkness into the
light of His glorious Gospel, and has granted unto me the saving
knowledge of Christ Jesus, my Lord.

We conclude with Paul, that we are justified by faith in Christ, without the
Law. Once a person has been justified by Christ, he will not be
unproductive of good, but as a good tree he will bring forth good fruit. A
believer has the Holy Spirit, and the Holy Spirit will not permit a person
to remain idle, but will put him to work and stir him up to the love of
God, to patient suffering in affliction, to prayer, thanksgiving, to the habit
of charity towards all men.

  VERSE 19. For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live
  unto God.

This cheering form of speech is frequently met with in the Scriptures,
particularly in the writings of St. Paul, when the Law is set against the
Law, and sin is made to oppose sin, and death is arrayed against death, and
hell is turned loose against hell, as in the following quotations: “Thou
hast led captivity captive,” Psalm 68:18. “O death, I will be thy plagues; O
grave, I will be thy destruction,” Hosea 13:14. “And for sin, condemned sin
in the flesh,” Romans 8:3.

Here Paul plays the Law against the Law, as if to say: “The Law of Moses
condemns me; but I have another law, the law of grace and liberty which
condemns the accusing Law of Moses.”

On first sight Paul seems to be advancing a strange and ugly heresy. He
says, “I am dead to the law, that I might live unto God.” The false apostles
said the very opposite. They said, “If you do not live to the law, you are
dead unto God.”

The doctrine of our opponents is similar to that of the false apostles in
Paul’s day. Our opponents teach, “If you want to live unto God, you must
live after the Law, for it is written, Do this and thou shalt live.” Paul, on
the other hand, teaches, “We cannot live unto God unless we are dead
unto the Law.” If we are dead unto the Law, the Law can have no power
over us.

Paul does not only refer to the Ceremonial Law, but to the whole Law. We
are not to think that the Law is wiped out. It stays. It continues to operate
in the wicked. But a Christian is dead to the Law. For example, Christ by
His resurrection became free from the grave, and yet the grave remains.
Peter was delivered from prison, yet the prison remains. The Law is
abolished as far as I am concerned, when it has driven me into the arms of
Christ. Yet the Law continues to exist and to function. But it no longer
exists for me.

“I have nothing to do with the Law,” cries Paul. He could not have uttered
anything more devastating to the prestige of the Law. He declares that he
does not care for the Law, that he does not intend ever to be justified by
the Law.

To be dead to the Law means to be free of the Law. What right, then, has
the Law to accuse me, or to hold anything against me? When you see a
person squirming in the clutches of the Law, say to him: “Brother, get
things straight. You let the Law talk to your conscience. Make it talk to
your flesh. Wake up, and believe in Jesus Christ, the Conqueror of Law
and sin. Faith in Christ will lift you high above the Law into the heaven of
grace. Though Law and sin remain, they no longer concern you, because
you are dead to the Law and dead to sin.”

Blessed is the person who knows how to use this truth in times of distress.
He can talk. He can say: “Mr. Law, go ahead and accuse me as much as you
like. I know I have committed many sins, and I continue to sin daily. But
that does not bother me. You have got to shout louder, Mr. Law. I am deaf,
you know. Talk as much as you like, I am dead to you. If you want to talk
to me about my sins, go and talk to my flesh. Belabor that, but don’t talk to
my conscience. My conscience is a lady and a queen, and has nothing to do
with the likes of you, because my conscience lives to Christ under another
law, a new and better law, the law of grace.”

We have two propositions: To live unto the Law, is to die unto God. To
die unto the Law, is to live unto God. These two propositions go against
reason. No law-worker can ever understand them. But see to it that you
understand them. The Law can never justify and save a sinner. The Law
can only accuse, terrify, and kill him. Therefore to live unto the Law is to
die unto God. Vice versa, to die unto the Law is to live unto God. If you
want to live unto God, bury the Law, and find life through faith in Christ

We have enough arguments right here to conclude that justification is by
faith alone. How can the Law effect our justification, when Paul so plainly
states that we must be dead to the Law if we want to live unto God? If we
are dead to the Law and the Law is dead to us, how can it possibly
contribute anything to our justification? There is nothing left for us but to
be justified by faith alone.

This nineteenth verse is loaded with consolation. It fortifies a person
against every danger. It allows you to argue like this:

  “I confess I have sinned.”
  “Then God will punish you.”
  “No, He will not do that.”
  “Why not? Does not the Law say so?”
  “I have nothing to do with the Law.”
  “How so?”
  “I have another law, the law of liberty.”
  “What do you mean–‘liberty’?”
  “The liberty of Christ, for Christ has made me free from the Law that
  held me down. That Law is now in prison itself, held captive by grace
  and liberty.”

By faith in Christ a person may gain such sure and sound comfort, that he
need not fear the devil, sin, death, or any evil. “Sir Devil,” he may say, “I
am not afraid of you. I have a Friend whose name is Jesus Christ, in
whom I believe. He has abolished the Law, condemned sin, vanquished
death, and destroyed hell for me. He is bigger than you, Satan. He has
licked you, and holds you down. You cannot hurt me.” This is the faith
that overcomes the devil.

Paul manhandles the Law. He treats the Law as if it were a thief and a
robber He treats the Law as contemptible to the conscience, in order that
those who believe in Christ may take courage to defy the Law, and say:
“Mr. Law, I am a sinner. What are you going to do about it?”

Or take death. Christ is risen from death. Why should we now fear the
grave? Against my death I set another death, or rather life, my life in

Oh, the sweet names of Jesus! He is called my law against the Law, my sin
against sin, my death against death. Translated, it means that He is my
righteousness, my life, my everlasting salvation. For this reason was He
made the law of the Law, the sin of sin, the death of death, that He might
redeem me from the curse of the Law. He permitted the Law to accuse
Him, sin to condemn Him, and death to take Him, to abolish the Law, to
condemn sin, and to destroy death for me.

This peculiar form of speech sounds much sweeter than if Paul had said:
“I through liberty am dead to the law.” By putting it in this way, “I
through the law am dead to the law,” he opposes one law with another
law, and has them fight it out.

In this masterly fashion Paul draws our attention away from the Law, sin,
death, and every evil, and centers it upon Christ.

  VERSE 20. I am crucified with Christ.

Christ is Lord over the Law, because He was crucified unto the Law. I also
am lord over the Law, because by faith I am crucified with Christ.

Paul does not here speak of crucifying the flesh, but he speaks of that
higher crucifying wherein sin, devil, and death are crucified in Christ and
in me. By my faith in Christ I am crucified with Christ. Hence these evils
are crucified and dead unto me.

  VERSE 20. Nevertheless I live.

“I do not mean to create the impression as though I did not live before
this. But in reality I first live now, now that I have been delivered from
the Law, from sin, and death. Being crucified with Christ and dead unto
the Law, I may now rise unto a new and better life.”

We must pay close attention to Paul’s way of speaking. He says that we are
crucified and dead unto the Law. The fact is, the Law is crucified and dead
unto us. Paul purposely speaks that way in order to increase the portion of
our comfort.

  VERSE 20. Yet not I.

Paul explains what constitutes true Christian righteousness. True
Christian righteousness is the righteousness of Christ who lives in us. We
must look away from our own person. Christ and my conscience must
become one, so that I can see nothing else but Christ crucified and raised
from the dead for me. If I keep on looking at myself, I am gone.

If we lose sight of Christ and begin to consider our past, we simply go to
pieces. We must turn our eyes to the brazen serpent, Christ crucified, and
believe with all our heart that He is our righteousness and our life. For
Christ, on whom our eyes are fixed, in whom we live, who lives in us, is
Lord over Law, sin, death, and all evil.

  VERSE 20. But Christ liveth in me.

“Thus I live,” the Apostle starts out. But presently he corrects himself,
saying, “Yet not I, but Christ liveth in me.” He is the form of my
perfection. He embellishes my faith.

Since Christ is now living in me, He abolishes the Law, condemns sin, and
destroys death in me. These foes vanish in His presence. Christ abiding in
me drives out every evil. This union with Christ delivers me from the
demands of the Law, and separates me from my sinful self. As long as I
abide in Christ, nothing can hurt me.

Christ domiciling in me, the old Adam has to stay outside and remain
subject to the Law. Think what grace, righteousness, life, peace, and
salvation there is in me, thanks to that inseparable conjunction between
Christ and me through faith!

Paul has a peculiar style, a celestial way of speaking. “I live,” he says, “I
live not; I am dead, I am not dead; I am a sinner, I am not a sinner; I have
the Law, I have no Law.” When we look at ourselves we find plenty of sin.
But when we look at Christ, we have no sin. Whenever we separate the
person of Christ from our own person, we live under the Law and not in
Christ; we are condemned by the Law, dead before God.

Faith connects you so intimately with Christ, that He and you become as it
were one person. As such you may boldly say: “I am now one with Christ.
Therefore Christ’s righteousness, victory, and life are mine.” On the other
hand, Christ may say: “I am that big sinner. His sins and his death are
mine, because he is joined to me, and I to him.”

Whenever remission of sins is freely proclaimed, people misinterpret it
according to Romans 3:8, “Let us do evil, that good may come.” As soon as
people hear that we are not justified by the Law, they reason maliciously:
“Why, then let us reject the Law. If grace abounds, where sin abounds, let
us abound in sin, that grace may all the more abound.” People who reason
thus are reckless. They make sport of the Scriptures and slander the
sayings of the Holy Ghost.

However, there are others who are not malicious, only weak, who may
take offense when told that Law and good works are unnecessary for
salvation. These must be instructed as to why good works do not justify,
and from what motives good works must be done. Good works are not the
cause, but the fruit of righteousness. When we have become righteous,
then first are we able and willing to do good. The tree makes the apple; the
apple does not make the tree.

  VERSE 20. And the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the
  faith of the Son of God.

Paul does not deny the fact that he is living in the flesh. He performs the
natural functions of the flesh. But he says that this is not his real life.
His  life in the flesh is not a life after the flesh.

“I live by the faith of the Son of God,” he says. “My speech is no longer
directed by the flesh, but by the Holy Ghost. My sight is no longer governed
by the flesh, but by the Holy Ghost. My hearing is no longer determined by
the flesh, but by the Holy Ghost. I cannot teach, write, pray, or give thanks
without the instrumentality of the flesh; yet these activities do not proceed
from the flesh, but from God.”

A Christian uses earthly means like any unbeliever. Outwardly they look
alike. Nevertheless there is a great difference between them. I may live in
the flesh, but I do not live after the flesh. I do my living now “by the faith
of the Son of God.” Paul had the same voice, the same tongue, before and
after his conversion. Before his conversion his tongue uttered
blasphemies. But after his conversion his tongue spoke a spiritual,
heavenly language.

We may now understand how spiritual life originates. It enters the heart
by faith. Christ reigns in the heart with His Holy Spirit, who sees, hears,
speaks, works, suffers, and does all things in and through us over the
protest and the resistance of the flesh.

  VERSE 20. Who loved me, and gave himself for me.

The sophistical papists assert that a person is able by natural strength to
love God long before grace has entered his heart, and to perform works of
real merit. They believe they are able to fulfill the commandments of God.
They believe they are able to do more than God expects of them, so that
they are in a position to sell their superfluous merits to laymen, thereby
saving themselves and others. They are saving nobody. On the contrary,
they abolish the Gospel, they deride, deny, and blaspheme Christ, and call
upon themselves the wrath of God. This is what they get for living in
their own righteousness, and not in the faith of the Son of God.

The papists will tell you to do the best you can, and God will give you His
grace. They have a rhyme for it:

  “God will no more require of man, Than of himself perform he can.”

This may hold true in ordinary civic life. But the papists apply it to the
spiritual realm where a person can perform nothing but sin, because he is
sold under sin.

Our opponents go even further than that. They say, nature is depraved,
but the qualities of nature are untainted. Again we say: This may hold true
in everyday life, but not in the spiritual life. In spiritual matters a person
is by nature full of darkness, error, ignorance, malice, and perverseness in
will and in mind.
In view of this, Paul declares that Christ began and not we. “He loved me,
and gave Himself for me. He found in me no right mind and no good
will. But the good Lord had mercy upon me. Out of pure kindness He
loved me, loved me so that He gave Himself for me, that I should be free
from the Law, from sin, devil, and death.”

The words, “The Son of God who loved me, and gave Himself for me,”
are so many thunderclaps and lightning bolts of protest from heaven
against the righteousness of the Law. The wickedness, error, darkness,
ignorance in my mind and my will were so great, that it was quite
impossible for me to be saved by any other means than by the inestimable
price of Christ’s death.

Let us count the price. When you hear that such an enormous price was
paid for you, will you still come along with your cowl, your shaven pate,
your chastity, your obedience, your poverty, your works, your merits?
What do you want with all these trappings? What good are the works of
all men, and all the pains of the martyrs, in comparison with the pains of
the Son of God dying on the Cross, so that there was not a drop of His
precious blood, but it was all shed for your sins. If you could properly
evaluate this incomparable price, you would throw all your ceremonies,
vows, works, and merits into the ash can. What awful presumption to
imagine that there is any work good enough to pacify God, when to pacify
God required the invaluable price of the death and blood of His own and
only Son?

  VERSE 20. For me.

Who is this “me”? I, wretched and damnable sinner, dearly beloved of
the Son of God. If I could by work or merit love the Son of God and come
to Him, why should He have sacrificed Himself for me ? This shows how
the papists ignore the Scriptures, particularly the doctrine of faith. If they
had paid any attention at all to these words, that it was absolutely
necessary for the Son of God to be given into death for me, they would
never have invented so many hideous heresies.

I always say, there is no remedy against the sects, no power to resist them,
except this article of Christian righteousness. If we lose this article we
shall never be able to combat errors or sects. What business have they to
make such a fuss about works or merits? If I, a condemned sinner, could have
been purchased and redeemed by any other price, why should the Son of
God have given Himself for me? Just because there was no other price in
heaven and on earth big and good enough, was it necessary for the Son of
God to be delivered for me. This He did out of His great love for me, for
the Apostle says, “Who loved me.”

Did the Law ever love me? Did the Law ever sacrifice itself for me? Did
the Law ever die for me? On the contrary, it accuses me, it frightens me,
it drives me crazy. Somebody else saved me from the Law, from sin and
death unto eternal life. That Somebody is the Son of God, to whom be
praise and glory forever.

Hence, Christ is no Moses, no tyrant, no lawgiver, but the Giver of grace,
the Savior, full of mercy. In short, He is no less than infinite mercy and
ineffable goodness, bountifully giving Himself for us. Visualize Christ in
these His true colors. I do not say that it is easy. Even in the present
diffusion of the Gospel light, I have much trouble to see Christ as Paul
portrays Him. So deeply has the diseased opinion that Christ is a lawgiver
sunk into my bones. You younger men are a good deal better off than we
who are old. You have never become infected with the nefarious errors on
which I suckled all my youth, until at the mention of the name of Christ I
shivered with fear. You, I say, who are young may learn to know Christ in
all His sweetness.

For Christ is Joy and Sweetness to a broken heart. Christ is a Lover of poor
sinners, and such a Lover that He gave Himself for us. Now if this is true,
and it is true, then are we never justified by our own righteousness.

Read the words “me” and “for me” with great emphasis. Print this “me”
with capital letters in your heart, and do not ever doubt that you belong to
the number of those who are meant by this “me.” Christ did not only love
Peter and Paul. The same love He felt for them He feels for us. If we
cannot deny that we are sinners, we cannot deny that Christ died for our

  VERSE 21. I do not frustrate the grace of God.

Paul is now getting ready for the second argument of his Epistle, to the
effect that to seek justification by works of the Law, is to reject the grace
of God. I ask you, what sin can be more horrible than to reject the grace of
God, and to refuse the righteousness of Christ? It is bad enough that we are
wicked sinners and transgressors of all the commandments of God; on top
of that to refuse the grace of God and the remission of sins offered unto us
by Christ, is the worst sin of all, the sin of sins. That is the limit. There
is no sin which Paul and the other apostles detested more than when a
person despises the grace of God in Christ Jesus. Still there is no sin more
common. That is why Paul can get so angry at the Antichrist, because he
snubs Christ, rebuffs the grace of God, and refuses the merit of Christ.
What else would you call it but spitting in Christ’s face, pushing Christ to
the side, usurping Christ’s throne, and to say: “I am going to justify you
people; I am going to save you.” By what means? By masses, pilgrimages,
pardons, merits, etc. For this is Antichrist’s doctrine: Faith is no good,
unless it is reinforced by works. By this abominable doctrine Antichrist has
spoiled, darkened, and buried the benefit of Christ, and in place of the
grace of Christ and His Kingdom, he has established the doctrine of works
and the kingdom of ceremonies.

We despise the grace of God when we observe the Law for the purpose of
being justified. The Law is good, holy, and profitable, but it does not
justify. To keep the Law in order to be justified means to reject grace, to
deny Christ, to despise His sacrifice, and to be lost.

  VERSE 21. For if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead
  in vain.

Did Christ die, or did He not die? Was His death worth while, or was it
not? If His death was worth while, it follows that righteousness does not
come by the Law. Why was Christ born anyway? Why was He crucified?
Why did He suffer? Why did He love me and give Himself for me? It was
all done to no purpose if righteousness is to be had by the Law.

Or do you think that God spared not His Son, but delivered Him for us all,
for the fun of it? Before I would admit anything like that, I would consign
the holiness of the saints and of the angels to hell.

To reject the grace of God is a common sin, of which everybody is guilty
who sees any righteousness in himself or in his deeds. And the Pope is the
sole author of this iniquity. Not content to spoil the Gospel of Christ, he
has filled the world with his cursed traditions, e.g., his bulls and

We will always affirm with Paul that either Christ died in vain, or else the
Law cannot justify us. But Christ did not suffer and die in vain. Hence, the
Law does not justify.

If my salvation was so difficult to accomplish that it necessitated the death
of Christ, then all my works, all the righteousness of the Law, are good for
nothing. How can I buy for a penny what cost a million dollars? The Law
is a penny’s worth when you compare it with Christ. Should I be so stupid
as to reject the righteousness of Christ which cost me nothing, and slave
like a fool to achieve the righteousness of the Law which God disdains?

Man’s own righteousness is in the last analysis a despising and rejecting of
the grace of God. No combination of words can do justice to such an
outrage. It is an insult to say that any man died in vain. But to say that
Christ died in vain is a deadly insult. To say that Christ died in vain is to
make His resurrection, His victory, His glory, His kingdom, heaven, earth,
God Himself, of no purpose and benefit whatever.

That is enough to set any person against the righteousness of the Law and
all the trimmings of men’s own righteousness, the orders of monks and
friars, and their superstitions.

Who would not detest his own vows, his cowls, his shaven crown, his
bearded traditions, yes, the very Law of Moses, when he hears that for such
things he rejected the grace of God and the death of Christ. It seems that
such a horrible wickedness could not enter a man’s heart, that he should
reject the grace of God, and despise the death of Christ. And yet this
atrocity is all too common. Let us be warned. Everyone who seeks
righteousness without Christ, either by works, merits, satisfactions,
actions, or by the Law, rejects the grace of God, and despises the death of

                                  CHAPTER 3

  VERSE 1. 0 foolish Galatians.

THE Apostle Paul manifests his apostolic care for the Galatians. Sometimes he
entreats them, then again he reproaches them, in accordance with his own
advice to Timothy: “Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season;
reprove, rebuke, exhort.”

In the midst of his discourse on Christian righteousness Paul breaks off, and
turns to address the Galatians. “O foolish Galatians,” he cries. “I have
brought you the true Gospel, and you received it with eagerness and
gratitude. Now all of a sudden you drop the Gospel. What has got into you?”

Paul reproves the Galatians rather sharply when he calls them “fools,
bewitched, and disobedient.” Whether he is indignant or sorry, I cannot say.
He may be both. It is the duty of a Christian pastor to reprove the people
committed to his charge. Of course, his anger must not flow from malice, but
from affection and a real zeal for Christ.

There is no question that Paul is disappointed. It hurts him to think that
his Galatians showed so little stability. We can hear him say: “I am sorry to
hear of your troubles, and disappointed in you for the disgraceful part you
played.” I say rather much on this point to save Paul from the charge that he
railed upon the churches, contrary to the spirit of the Gospel.

A certain distance and coolness can be noted in the title with which the
Apostle addresses the Galatians. He does not now address them as his
brethren, as he usually does. He addresses them as Galatians in order to
remind them of their national trait to be foolish.

We have here an example of bad traits that often cling to individual
Christians and entire congregations. Grace does not suddenly transform a
Christian into a new and perfect creature. Dregs of the old and natural
corruption remain. The Spirit of God cannot at once overcome human
deficiency. Sanctification takes time.

Although the Galatians had been enlightened by the Holy Spirit through the
preaching of faith, something of their national trait of foolishness plus
their original depravity clung to them. Let no man think that once he has
received faith, he can presently be converted into a faultless creature. The
leavings of old vices will stick to him, be he ever so good a Christian.

  VERSE 1. Who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth?

Paul calls the Galatians foolish and bewitched. In the fifth chapter he
mentions sorcery among the works of the flesh, declaring that witchcraft and
sorcery are real manifestations and legitimate activities of the devil. We
are all exposed to the influence of the devil, because he is the prince and
god of the world in which we live.

Satan is clever. He does not only bewitch men in a crude manner, but also in
a more artful fashion. He bedevils the minds of men with hideous fallacies.
Not only is he able to deceive the self-assured, but even those who profess
the true Christian faith. There is not one among us who is not at times
seduced by Satan into false beliefs.

This accounts for the many new battles we have to wage nowadays. But the
attacks of the old Serpent are not without profit to us, for they confirm our
doctrine and strengthen our faith in Christ. Many a time we were wrestled
down in these conflicts with Satan, but Christ has always triumphed and
always will triumph. Do not think that the Galatians were the only ones to be
bewitched by the devil. Let us realize that we too may be seduced by Satan.

  VERSE 1. Who hath bewitched you?

In this sentence Paul excuses the Galatians, while he blames the false
apostles for the apostasy of the Galatians.

As if he were saying: “I know your defection was not willful. The devil sent
the false apostles to you, and they tallied you into believing that you are
justified by the Law. With this our epistle we endeavor to undo the damage
which the false apostles have inflicted upon you.”

Like Paul, we struggle with the Word of God against the fanatical Anabaptists
of our day; and our efforts are not entirely in vain. The trouble is there
are many who refuse to be instructed. They will not listen to reason; they
will not listen to the Scriptures, because they are bewitched by the tricky
devil who can make a lie look like the truth.

Since the devil has this uncanny ability to make us believe a lie until we
would swear a thousand times it were the truth, we must not be proud, but
walk in fear and humility, and call upon the Lord Jesus to save us from

Although I am a doctor of divinity, and have preached Christ and fought His
battles for a long time, I know from personal experience how difficult it is
to hold fast to the truth. I cannot always shake off Satan. I cannot always
apprehend Christ as the Scriptures portray Him. Sometimes the devil distorts
Christ to my vision. But thanks be to God, who keeps us in His Word, in
faith, and in prayer.

The spiritual witchery of the devil creates in the heart a wrong idea of
Christ. Those who share the opinion that a person is justified by the works
of the Law, are simply bewitched. Their belief goes against faith and Christ.

  VERSE 1. That ye should not obey the truth.

Paul incriminates the Galatians in worse failure. “You are so bewitched that
you no longer obey the truth. I fear many of you have strayed so far that you
will never return to the truth.”

The apostasy of the Galatians is a fine indorsement of the Law, all right.
You may preach the Law ever so fervently; if the preaching of the Gospel does
not accompany it, the Law will never produce true conversion and heartfelt
repentance. We do not mean to say that the preaching of the Law is without
value, but it only serves to bring home to us the wrath of God. The Law bows
a person down. It takes the Gospel and the preaching of faith in Christ to
raise and save a person.

  VERSE 1. Before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth.

Paul’s increasing severity becomes apparent as he reminds the Galatians that
they disobeyed the truth in defiance of the vivid description he had given
them of Christ. So vividly had he described Christ to them that they could
almost see and handle Him. As if Paul were to say: “No artist with all his
colors could have pictured Christ to you as vividly as I have pictured Him to
you by my preaching. Yet you permitted yourselves to be seduced to the extent
that you disobeyed the truth of Christ.”

  VERSE 1. Crucifed among you.

“You have not only rejected the grace of God, you have shamefully crucified
Christ among you.” Paul employs the same phraseology in Hebrews 6:6: “Seeing
they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open

It should make any person afraid to hear Paul say that those who seek to be
justified by the Law, not only deny Christ, but also crucify Him anew. If
those who seek to be justified by the Law and its works are crucifiers of
Christ, what are they, I like to know, who seek salvation by the filthy rags
of their own work-righteousness?

Can there be anything more horrible than the papacy, an alliance of people
who crucify Christ in themselves, in the Church, and in the hearts of the

Of all the diseased and vicious doctrines of the papacy the worst is this: “If
you want to serve God you must earn your own remission of sins and
everlasting life, and in addition help others to obtain salvation by giving
them the benefit of your extra work-holiness.” Monks, friars, and all the
rest of them brag that besides the ordinary requirements common to all
Christians, they do the works of supererogation, i.e., the performance of
more than is required. This is certainly a fiendish illusion.

No wonder Paul employs such sharp language in his effort to recall the
Galatians from the doctrine of the false apostles. He says to them: “Don’t
you realize what you have done? You have crucified Christ anew because you
seek salvation by the Law.”

True, Christ can no longer be crucified in person, but He is crucified in us
when we reject grace, faith, free remission of sins and endeavor to be
justified by our own works, or by the works of the Law.

The Apostle is incensed at the presumptuousness of any person who thinks he
can perform the Law of God to his own salvation. He charges that person with
the atrocity of crucifying anew the Son of God.

  VERSE 2. This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the
  works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?

There is a touch of irony in these words of the Apostle. “Come on now, my
smart Galatians, you who all of a sudden have become doctors, while I seem to
be your pupil: Received ye the Holy Ghost by the works of the Law, or by the
preaching of the Gospel?” This question gave them something to think about,
because their own experience contradicted them.

“You cannot say that you received the Holy Spirit by the Law. As long as you
were servants of the Law, you never received the Holy Ghost. Nobody ever
heard of the Holy Ghost being given to anybody, be he doctor or dunce, as a
result of the preaching of the Law. In your own case, you have not only
learned the Law by heart, you have labored with all your might to perform it.
You most of all should have received the Holy Ghost by the Law, if that were
possible. You cannot show me that this ever happened. But as soon as the
Gospel came your way, you received the Holy Ghost by the simple hearing of
faith, before you ever had a chance to do a single good deed.” Luke verifies
this statement of Paul in the Book of Acts: “While Peter yet spake these
words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.” (Acts 10:44.)
“And as I began to speak, the Holy Ghost fell on them, as on us at the
beginning.” (Acts 11:15.)

Try to appreciate the force of Paul’s argument which is so often repeated in
the Book of Acts. That Book was written for the express purpose of verifying
Paul’s assertion, that the Holy Ghost comes upon men, not in response to the
preaching of the Law, but in response to the preaching of the Gospel. When
Peter preached Christ at the first Pentecost, the Holy Ghost fell upon the
hearers, “and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand
souls.” Cornelius received the Holy Ghost while Peter was speaking of Christ.
“The Holy Ghost fell on all of them which heard the word.” These are actual
experiences that cannot very well be denied. When Paul and Barnabas returned
to Jerusalem and reported what they had been able to accomplish among the
Gentiles, the whole Church was astonished, particularly when it heard that
the uncircumcised Gentiles had received the Holy Ghost by the preaching of
faith in Christ.

Now as God gave the Holy Ghost to the Gentiles without the Law by the simple
preaching of the Gospel, so He gave the Holy Ghost also to the Jews, without
the Law, through faith alone. If the righteousness of the Law were necessary
unto salvation, the Holy Ghost would never have come to the Gentiles, because
they did not bother about the Law. Hence the Law does not justify, but faith
in Christ justifies.

How was it with Cornelius? Cornelius and his friends whom he had invited over
to his house, do nothing but sit and listen. Peter is doing the talking. They
just sit and do nothing. The Law is far removed from their thoughts. They
burn no sacrifices. They are not at all interested in circumcision. All they
do is to sit and listen to Peter. Suddenly the Holy Ghost enters their
hearts. His presence is unmistakable, “for they spoke with tongues and
magnified God.”

Right here we have one more difference between the Law and the Gospel. The
Law does not bring on the Holy Ghost. The Gospel, however, brings on the gift
of the Holy Ghost, because it is the nature of the Gospel to convey good
gifts. The Law and the Gospel are contrary ideas. They have contrary
functions and purposes. To endow the Law with any capacity to produce
righteousness is to plagiarize the Gospel. The Gospel brings donations. It
pleads for open hands to take what is being offered. The Law has nothing to
give. It demands, and its demands are impossible.

Our opponents come back at us with Cornelius. Cornelius, they point out, was
“a devout man, and one that feared God with all his house, which gave much
alms to the people and prayed God always.” Because of these qualifications,
he merited the forgiveness of sins, and the gift of the Holy Ghost. So reason
our opponents.

  I answer: Cornelius was a Gentile. You cannot deny it. As a Gentile he
  was uncircumcised. As a Gentile he did not observe the Law. He never
  gave the Law any thought. For all that, he was justified and received
  the Holy Ghost. How can the Law avail anything unto righteousness?
Our opponents are not satisfied. They reply: “Granted that Cornelius was a
Gentile and did not receive the Holy Ghost by the Law, yet the text plainly
states that he was a devout man who feared God, gave alms, and prayed. Don’t
you think he deserved the gift of the Holy Ghost?”

  I answer: Cornelius had the faith of the fathers who were saved by
  faith in the Christ to come. If Cornelius had died before Christ, he
  would have been saved because he believed in the Christ to come. But
  because the Messiah had already come, Cornelius had to be apprized of
  the fact. Since Christ has come we cannot be saved by faith in the
  Christ to come, but we must believe that he has come. The object of
  Peter’s visit was to acquaint Cornelius with the fact that Christ was
  no longer to be looked for, because He is here.

As to the contention of our opponents that Cornelius deserved grace and the
gift of the Holy Ghost, because he was devout and just, we say that these
attributes are the characteristics of a spiritual person who already has
faith in Christ, and not the characteristics of a Gentile or of natural man.
Luke first praises Cornelius for being a devout and God-fearing man, and then
Luke mentions the good works, the alms and prayers of Cornelius. Our
opponents ignore the sequence of Luke’s words. They pounce on this one
sentence, “which gave much alms to the people,” because it serves their
assertion that merit precedes grace. The fact is that Cornelius gave alms and
prayed to God because he had faith. And because of his faith in the Christ to
come, Peter was delegated to preach unto Cornelius faith in the Christ who
had already come. This argument is convincing enough. Cornelius was justified
without the Law, therefore the Law cannot justify.

Take the case of Naaman, the Syrian, who was a Gentile and did not belong to
the race of Moses. Yet his flesh was cleansed, the God of Israel was revealed
unto him, and he received the Holy Ghost. Naaman confessed his faith:
“Behold, now I know that there is no God in all the earth, but in Israel.”
(II Kings 5:15.) Naaman does not do a thing. He does not busy himself with
the Law. He was never circumcised. That does not mean that his faith was
inactive. He said to the Prophet Elisha: “Thy servant will henceforth offer
neither burnt offering nor sacrifice unto other gods, but unto the Lord. In
this thing the Lord pardon thy servant, that when my master goeth into the
house of Rimmon to worship there, and he leaneth on my hand, and I bow myself
in the house of Rimmon: when I bow down myself in the house of Rimmon, the
Lord pardon thy servant in this thing.” What did the Prophet tell him?” Go in
peace.” The Jews do not like to hear the prophet say this. “What,” they
exclaim, “should this heathen be justified without the Law? Should he be made
equal to us who are circumcised?”

Long before the time of Moses, God justified men without the Law. He
justified many kings of Egypt and Babylonia. He justified Job. Nineveh, that
great city, was justified and received the promise of God that He would not
destroy the city. Why was Nineveh spared? Not because it fulfilled the Law,
but because Nineveh believed the word of God. The Prophet Jonah writes: “So
the people of Nineveh believed God, and proclaimed a fast, and put on
sackcloth.” They repented. Nowhere in the Book of Jonah do you read that the
Ninevites received the Law of Moses, or that they were circumcised, or that
they offered sacrifices.

All this happened long before Christ was born. If the Gentiles were justified
without the Law and quietly received the Holy Spirit at a time when the Law
was in full force, why should the Law count unto righteousness now, now that
Christ has fulfilled the Law?

And yet many devote much time and labor to the Law, to the decrees of the
fathers, and to the traditions of the Pope. Many of these specialists have
incapacitated themselves for any kind of work, good or bad, by their rigorous
attention to rules and laws. All the same, they could not obtain a quiet
conscience and peace in Christ. But the moment the Gospel of Christ touches
them, certainty comes to them, and joy, and a right judgment.

I have good reason for enlarging upon this point. The heart of man finds it
difficult to believe that so great a treasure as the Holy Ghost is gotten by
the mere hearing of faith. The hearer likes to reason like this: Forgiveness
of sins, deliverance from death, the gift of the Holy Ghost, everlasting life
are grand things. If you want to obtain these priceless benefits, you must
engage in correspondingly great efforts. And the devil says, “Amen.”

We must learn that forgiveness of sins, Christ, and the Holy Ghost, are
freely granted unto us at the preaching of faith, in spite of our sinfulness.
We are not to waste time thinking how unworthy we are of the blessings of
God. We are to know that it pleased God freely to give us His unspeakable
gifts. If He offers His gifts free of charge, why not take them? Why worry
about our lack of worthiness? Why not accept gifts with joy and thanksgiving?

Right away foolish reason is once more offended. It scolds us. “When you say
that a person can do nothing to obtain the grace of God, you foster carnal
security. People become shiftless and will do no good at all. Better not
preach this doctrine of faith. Rather urge the people to exert and to
exercise themselves in good works, so that the Holy Ghost will feel like
coming to them.”

What did Jesus say to Martha when she was very “careful and troubled about
many things” and could hardly stand to see her sister Mary sitting at the
feet of Jesus, just listening? “Martha, Martha,” Jesus said, “thou art
careful and troubled about many things: but one thing is needful; and Mary
hath chosen that good part, which shall not be taken away from her.” A person
becomes a Christian not by working, but by hearing. The first step to being a
Christian is to hear the Gospel. When a person has accepted the Gospel, let
him first give thanks unto God with a glad heart, and then let him get busy
on the good works to strive for, works that really please God, and not
man-made and self-chosen works.

Our opponents regard faith as an easy thing, but I know from personal
experience how hard it is to believe. That the Holy Ghost is received by
faith, is quickly said, but not so quickly done.

All believers experience this difficulty. They would gladly embrace the Word
with a full faith, but the flesh deters them. You see, our reason always
thinks it is too easy and cheap to have righteousness, the Holy Spirit, and
life everlasting by the mere hearing of the Gospel

  VERSE 3. Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made
  perfect by the flesh?

Paul now begins to warn the Galatians against a twofold danger. The first
danger is: “Are ye so foolish, that after ye have begun in the Spirit, ye
would now end in the flesh?”

“Flesh” stands for the righteousness of reason which seeks justification by
the accomplishment of the Law. I am told that I began in the spirit under the
papacy, but am ending up in the flesh because I got married. As though single
life were a spiritual life, and married life a carnal life. They are silly.
All the duties of a Christian husband, e.g., to love his wife, to bring up
his children, to govern his family, etc., are the very fruits of the Spirit.

The righteousness of the Law which Paul also terms the righteousness of the
flesh is so far from justifying a person that those who once had the Holy
Spirit and lost Him, end up in the Law to their complete destruction.

  VERSE 4. Have ye suffered so many things in vain?

The other danger against which the Apostle warns the Galatians is this: “Have
ye suffered so many things in vain?” Paul wants to say: “Consider not only
the good start you had and lost, but consider also the many things you have
suffered for the sake of the Gospel and for the name of Christ. You have
suffered the loss of your possessions, you have borne reproaches, you have
passed through many dangers of body and life. You endured much for the name
of Christ and you endured it faithfully. But now you have lost everything,
the Gospel, faith, and the spiritual benefit of your sufferings for Christ’s
sake. What a miserable thing to endure so many amictions for nothing.”

  VERSE 4. If it be yet in vain.

The Apostle adds the afterthought: “If it be yet in vain. I do not despair of
all hope for you. But if you continue to look to the Law for righteousness, I
think you should be told that all your past true worship of God and all the
afflictions that you have endured for Christ’s sake are going to help you not
at all. I do not mean to discourage you altogether. I do hope you will repent
and amend.”

  VERSE 5. He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh
  miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the
  hearing of faith?

This argument based on the experience of the Galatians, pleased the Apostle
so well that he returns to it after he had warned them against their twofold
danger. “You have not only received the Spirit by the preaching of the
Gospel, but by the same Gospel you were enabled to do things.” “What things?”
we ask. Miracles. At least the Galatians had manifested the striking fruits
of faith which true disciples of the Gospel manifested in those days. On one
occasion the Apostle wrote: “The kingdom of God is not in word, but in
power.” This “power” revealed itself not only in readiness of speech, but in
demonstrations of the supernatural ability of the Holy Spirit.

When the Gospel is preached unto faith, hope, love, and patience, God gives
His wonder-working Spirit. Paul reminds the Galatians of this. “God had not
only brought you to faith by my preaching. He had also sanctified you to
bring forth the fruits of faith. And one of the fruits of your faith was that
you loved me so devotedly that you were willing to pluck out your eyes for
me.” To love a fellow-man so devotedly as to be ready to bestow upon him
money, goods, eyes in order to secure his salvation, such love is the fruit
of the Holy Spirit.

“These products of the Spirit you enjoyed before the false apostles misled
you,” the Apostle reminds the Galatians. “But you haven’t manifested any of
these fruits under the regime of the Law. How does it come that you do not
grow the same fruits now? You no longer teach truly; you do not believe
boldly; you do not live well; you do not work hard; you do not bear things
patiently. Who has spoiled you that you no longer love me; that you are not
now ready to pluck out your eyes for me? What has happened to cool your
personal interest in me?”

The same thing happened to me. When I began to proclaim the Gospel, there
were many, very many who were delighted with our doctrine and had a good
opinion of us. And now? Now they have succeeded in making us so odious to
those who formerly loved us that they now hate us like poison.

Paul argues: “Your experience ought to teach you that the fruits of love do
not grow on the stump of the Law. You had not virtue prior to the preaching
of the Gospel and you have no virtues now under the regime of the false

We, too, may say to those who misname themselves “evangelical” and flout
their new-found liberty: Have you put down the tyranny of the Pope and
obtained liberty in Christ through the Anabaptists and other fanatics? Or
have you obtained your freedom from us who preach faith in Christ Jesus? If
there is any honesty left in them they will have to confess that their
freedom dates from the preaching of the Gospel.

  VERSE 6. Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him
  for righteousness.

The Apostle next adduces the example of Abraham and reviews the testimony of
the Scriptures concerning faith. The first passage is taken from Genesis
16:6: “And he believed in the Lord; and he counted it to him for
righteousness.” The Apostle makes the most of this passage. Abraham may
have enjoyed a good standing with men for his upright life, but not with God.
In the sight of God, Abraham was a condemned sinner. That he was justified
before God was not due to his own exertions, but due to his faith. The
Scriptures expressly state: “Abraham believed in the Lord; and he counted it
to him for righteousness.”

Paul places the emphasis upon the two words: Abraham believed. Faith in God
constitutes the highest worship, the prime duty, the first obedience, and the
foremost sacrifice. Without faith God forfeits His glory, wisdom, truth, and
mercy in us. The first duty of man is to believe in God and to honor Him with
his faith. Faith is truly the height of wisdom, the right kind of
righteousness, the only real religion. This will give us an idea of the
excellence of faith.

To believe in God as Abraham did is to be right with God because faith honors
God. Faith says to God: “I believe what you say.”
When we pay attention to reason, God seems to propose impossible matters in
the Christian Creed. To reason it seems absurd that Christ should offer His
body and blood in the Lord’s Supper; that Baptism should be the washing of
regeneration; that the dead shall rise; that Christ the Son of God was
conceived in the womb of the Virgin Mary, etc. Reason shouts that all this is
preposterous. Are you surprised that reason thinks little of faith? Reason
thinks it ludicrous that faith should be the foremost service any person can
render unto God.

Let your faith supplant reason. Abraham mastered reason by faith in the Word
of God. Not as though reason ever yields meekly. It put up a fight against
the faith of Abraham. Reason protested that it was absurd to think that Sarah
who was ninety years old and barren by nature, should give birth to a son.
But faith won the victory and routed reason, that ugly beast and enemy of
God. Everyone who by faith slays reason, the world’s biggest monster, renders
God a real service, a better service than the religions of all races and all
the drudgery of meritorious monks can render.

Men fast, pray, watch, suffer. They intend to appease the wrath of God and to
deserve God’s grace by their exertions. But there is no glory in it for God,
because by their exertions these workers pronounce God an unmerciful slave
driver, an unfaithful and angry Judge. They despise God, make a liar out of
Him, snub Christ and all His benefits; in short they pull God from His throne
and perch themselves on it.

Faith truly honors God. And because faith honors God, God counts faith for

Christian righteousness is the confidence of the heart in God through Christ
Jesus. Such confidence is accounted righteousness for Christ’s sake. Two
things make for Christian righteousness: Faith in Christ, which is a gift of
God; and God’s acceptance of this imperfect faith of ours for perfect
righteousness. Because of my faith in Christ, God overlooks my distrust, the
unwillingness of my spirit, my many other sins. Because the shadow of
Christ’s wing covers me I have no fear that God will cover all my sins and
take my imperfections for perfect righteousness.

God “winks” at my sins and covers them up. God says: “Because you believe in
My Son I will forgive your sins until death shall deliver you from the body
of sin.”

Learn to understand the constitution of your Christian righteousness. Faith
is weak, but it means enough to God that He will not lay sin to our charge.
He will not punish nor condemn us for it. He will forgive our sins as though
they amount to nothing at all. He will do it not because we are worthy of
such mercy. He will do it for Jesus’ sake in whom we believe.

Paradoxically, a Christian is both right and wrong, holy and profane, an
enemy of God and a child of God. These contradictions no person can harmonize
who does not understand the true way of salvation. Under the papacy we were
told to toil until the feeling of guilt had left us. But the authors of this
deranged idea were frequently driven to despair in the hour of death. It
would have happened to me, if Christ had not mercifully delivered me from
this error.

We comfort the afflicted sinner in this manner: Brother, you can never be
perfect in this life, but you can be holy. He will say: “How can I be holy
when I feel my sins?” I answer: You feel sin? That is a good sign. To realize
that one is ill is a step, and a very necessary step, toward recovery. “But
how will I get rid of my sin?” he will ask. I answer: See the heavenly
Physician, Christ, who heals the broken-hearted. Do not consult that
Quackdoctor, Reason. Believe in Christ and your sins will be pardoned. His
righteousness will become your righteousness, and your sins will become His

On one occasion Jesus said to His disciples: “The Father loveth you.” Why?
Not because the disciples were Pharisees, or circumcised, or particularly
attentive to the Law. Jesus said: “The Father loveth you, because ye have
loved me, and have believed that I came out from God. It pleased you to know
that the Father sent me into the world. And because you believed it the
Father loves you.” On another occasion Jesus called His disciples evil and
commanded them to ask for forgiveness.

A Christian is beloved of God and a sinner. How can these two contradictions
be harmonized: I am a sinner and deserve God’s wrath and punishment, and yet
the Father loves me? Christ alone can harmonize these contradictions. He is
the Mediator.

Do you now see how faith justifies without works? Sin lingers in us, and God
hates sin. A transfusion of righteousness therefore becomes vitally
necessary. This transfusion of righteousness we obtain from Christ because
we believe in Him.

  VERSE 7. Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are
  the children of Abraham.

This is the main point of Paul’s argument against the Jews: The children of
Abraham are those who believe and not those who are born of Abraham’s flesh
and blood. This point Paul drives home with all his might because the Jews
attached saving value to the genealogical fact: “We are the seed and children
of Abraham.”

Let us begin with Abraham and learn how this friend of God was justified and
saved. Not because he left his country, his relatives, his father’s house;
not because he was circumcised; not because he stood ready to sacrifice his
own son Isaac in whom he had the promise of posterity. Abraham was justified
because he believed. Paul’s argumentation runs like this: “Since this is the
unmistakable testimony of Holy Writ, why do you take your stand upon
circumcision and the Law? Was not Abraham, your father, of whom you make so
much, justified and saved without circumcision and the Law by faith alone?”
Paul therefore concludes: “They which are of faith, the same are the children
of Abraham.”

Abraham was the father of the faithful. In order to be a child of the
believing Abraham you must believe as he did. Otherwise you are merely the
physical offspring of the procreating Abraham, i.e., you were conceived and
born in sin unto wrath and condemnation.

Ishmael and Isaac were both the natural children of Abraham. By rights
Ishmael should have enjoyed the prerogatives of the firstborn, if physical
generation had any special value. Nevertheless he was left out in the cold
while Isaac was called. This goes to prove that the children of faith are the
real children of Abraham.

Some find fault with Paul for applying the term “faith” in Genesis 15:6 to
Christ. They think Paul’s use of the term too wide and general. They think
its meaning should be restricted to the context. They claim Abraham’s faith
had no more in it than a belief in the promise of God that he should have

We reply: Faith presupposes the assurance of God’s mercy. This assurance
takes in the confidence that our sins are forgiven for Christ’s sake. Never
will the conscience trust in God unless it can be sure of God’s mercy and
promises in Christ. Now all the promises of God lead back to the first
promise concerning Christ: “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman,
and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt
bruise his heel.” The faith of the fathers in the Old Testament era, and our
faith in the New Testament are one and the same faith in Christ Jesus,
although times and conditions may differ. Peter acknowledged this in the
words: “Which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear? But we believe
that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as
they.” (Acts l5: 10, 11.) And Paul writes: “And did all drink the spiritual
drink; for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that
Rock was Christ.” (I Cor. 10 :4.) And Christ Himself declared: “Your father
Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it and was glad.” (John 8:56.) The
faith of the fathers was directed at the Christ who was to come, while ours
rests in the Christ who has come. Time does not change the object of true
faith, or the Holy Spirit. There has always been and always will be one mind,
one impression, one faith concerning Christ among true believers whether they
live in times past, now, or in times to come. We too believe in the Christ to
come as the fathers did in the Old Testament, for we look for Christ to come
again on the last day to judge the quick and the dead.

  VERSE 7. Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are
  the children of Abraham.

Paul is saying: “You know from the example of Abraham and from the plain
testimony of the Scriptures that they are the children of Abraham, who have
faith in Christ, regardless of their nationality, regardless of the Law,
regardless of works, regardless of their parentage. The promise was made unto
Abraham, ‘Thou shalt be a father of many nations’; again, ‘And in thee shall
all families of the earth be blessed.”‘ To prevent the Jews from
misinterpreting the word “nations,” the Scriptures are careful to say “many
nations.” The true children of Abraham are the believers in Christ from all

  VERSE 8. And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the
  heathen through faith.

“Your boasting does not get you anywhere,” says Paul to the Galatians,
“because the Sacred Scriptures foresaw and foretold long before the Law was
ever given, that the heathen should be justified by the blessed ‘seed’ of
Abraham and not by the Law. This promise was made four hundred and thirty
years before the Law was given. Because the Law was given so many years after
Abraham, it could not abolish the promised blessing.” This argument is strong
because it is based on the exact factor of time. “Why should you boast of the
Law, my Galatians, when the Law came four hundred and thirty years after the
promise ?”

The false apostles glorified the Law and despised the promise made unto
Abraham, although it antedated the Law by many years. It was after Abraham
was accounted righteous because of his faith that the Scriptures first make
mention of circumcision. “The Scriptures,” says Paul, “meant to forestall
your infatuation for the righteousness of the Law by installing the
righteousness of faith before circumcision and the Law ever were ordained.”

  VERSE 8. Preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall
  all nations be blessed.

The Jews misconstrue this passage. They want the term “to bless” to mean “to
praise.” They want the passage to read: In thee shall all the nations of the
earth be praised. But this is a perversion of the words of Holy Writ. With
the words “Abraham believed” Paul describes a spiritual Abraham, renewed by
faith and regenerated by the Holy Ghost, that he should be the spiritual
father of many nations. In that way all the Gentiles could be given to him
for an inheritance.

The Scriptures ascribe no righteousness to Abraham except through faith. The
Scriptures speak of Abraham as he stands before God, a man justified by
faith. Because of his faith God extends to him the promise: “In thee shall
all nations be blessed.”

  VERSE 9. So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful

The emphasis lies on the words “with faithful Abraham.” Paul distinguishes
between Abraham and Abraham. There is a working and there is a believing
Abraham. With the working Abraham we have nothing to do. Let the Jews glory
in the generating Abraham; we glory in the believing Abraham of whom the
Scriptures say that he received the blessing of righteousness by faith, not
only for himself but for all who believe as he did. The world was promised to
Abraham because he believed. The whole world is blessed if it believes as
Abraham believed.

The blessing is the promise of the Gospel. That all nations are to be blessed
means that all nations are to hear the Gospel. All nations are to be declared
righteous before God through faith in Christ Jesus. To bless simply means to
spread abroad the knowledge of Christ’s salvation. This is the office of the
New Testament Church which distributes the promised blessing by preaching
the Gospel, by administering the sacraments, by comforting the broken-
hearted, in short, by dispensing the benefits of Christ.

The Jews exhibited a working Abraham. The Pope exhibits a working Christ, or
an exemplary Christ. The Pope quotes Christ’s saying recorded in John 13:15,
“I have given you an example, that ye should do as I have done to you.” We do
not deny that Christians ought to imitate the example of Christ; but mere
imitation will not satisfy God. And bear in mind that Paul is not now
discussing the example of Christ, but the salvation of Christ.
That Abraham submitted to circumcision at the command of God, that he was
endowed with excellent virtues, that he obeyed God in all things, was
certainly admirable of him. To follow the example of Christ, to love one’s
neighbor, to do good to them that persecute you, to pray for one’s enemies,
patiently to bear the ingratitude of those who return evil for good, is
certainly praiseworthy. But praiseworthy or not, such virtues do not acquit
us before God. It takes more than that to make us righteous before God. We
need Christ Himself, not His example, to save us. We need a redeeming, not an
exemplary Christ, to save us. Paul is here speaking of the redeeming Christ
and the believing Abraham, not of the model Christ or the sweating Abraham.

The believing Abraham is not to lie buried in the grave. He is to be dusted
off and brought out before the world. He is to be praised to the sky for his
faith. Heaven and earth ought to know about him and about his faith in
Christ. The working Abraham ought to look pretty small next to the believing

Paul’s words contain the implication of contrast. When he quotes Scripture to
the effect that all nations that share the faith of faithful Abraham are to
be blessed, Paul means to imply the contrast that all nations are accursed
without faith in Christ.

  VERSE 10. For as many as are of the works of the law are under the

The curse of God is like a flood that swallows everything that is not of
faith. To avoid the curse we must hold on to the promise of the blessing in

The reader is reminded that all this has no bearing upon civil laws,
customs, or political matters. Civil laws and ordinances have their place
and purpose. Let every government enact the best possible laws. But civil

righteousness will never deliver a person from the condemnation of
God’s Law.

I have good reason for calling your attention to this. People easily mistake
civil righteousness for spiritual righteousness. In civil life we must, of
course, pay attention to laws and deeds, but in the spiritual life we must
not think to be justified by laws and works, but always keep in mind the
promise and blessing of Christ, our only Savior.

According to Paul everything that is not of faith is sin. When our
opponents hear us repeat this statement of Paul, they make it appear as if
we taught that governments should not be honored, as if we favored
rebellion against the constituted authorities, as if we condemned all laws.
Our opponents do us a great wrong, for we make a clear-cut distinction
between civil and spiritual affairs.

Governmental laws and ordinances are blessings of God for this life only.
As for everlasting life, temporal blessings are not good enough.
Unbelievers enjoy more temporal blessings than the Christians. Civil or
legal righteousness may be good enough for this life but not for the life
hereafter. Otherwise the infidels would be nearer heaven than the
Christians, for infidels often excel in civil righteousness.

  VERSE 10. For it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in
  all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.

Paul goes on to prove from this quotation out of the Book of
Deuteronomy that all men who are under the Law are under the sentence
of sin, of the wrath of God, and of everlasting death. Paul produces his
proof in a roundabout way. He turns the negative statement, “Cursed is
every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book
of the law to do them,” into a positive statement, “As many as are of the
works of the law are under the curse.” These two statements, one by Paul
and the other by Moses, appear to conflict. Paul declares, “Whosoever
shall do the works of the Law, is accursed.” Moses declares, “Whosoever
shall not do the works of the Law, is accursed.” How can these two
contradictory statements be reconciled? How can the one statement prove
the other? No person can hope to understand Paul unless he understands
the article of justification. These two statements are not at all

We must bear in mind that to do the works of the Law does not mean
only to live up to the superficial requirements of the Law, but to obey the
spirit of the Law to perfection. But where will you find the person who can
do that? Let him step forward and we will praise him.

Our opponents have their answer ready-made. They quote Paul’s own
statement in Romans 2:13, “The doers of the law shall be justified.” Very
well. But let us first find out who the doers of the law are. They call a
“doer” of the Law one who performs the Law in its literal sense. This is
not to “do” the Law. This is to sin. When our opponents go about to
perform the Law they sin against the first, the second, and the third
commandments, in fact they sin against the whole Law. For God requires
above all that we worship Him in spirit and in faith. In observing the Law
for the purpose of obtaining righteousness without faith in Christ these
law-workers go smack against the Law and against God. They deny the
righteousness of God, His mercy, and His promises. They deny Christ and
all His benefits.

In their ignorance of the true purpose of the Law the exponents of the Law
abuse the Law, as Paul says, Romans 10:3, “For they, being ignorant of
God’s righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness,
have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.”

In their folly our opponents rush into the Scriptures, pick out a sentence
here and a sentence there about the Law and imagine they know all about
it. Their work-righteousness is plain idolatry and blasphemy against God.
No wonder they abide under the curse of God.

Because God saw that we could not fulfill the Law, He provided a way of
salvation long before the Law was ever given, a salvation that He
promised to Abraham, saying, “In thee shall all nations be blessed.”

The very first thing for us to do is to believe in Christ. First, we must
receive the Holy Spirit, who enlightens and sanctifies us so that we can
begin to do the Law, i.e., to love God and our neighbor. Now, the Holy  Ghost
is not obtained by the Law, but by faith in Christ. In the last analysis,  to
do the Law means to believe in Jesus Christ. The tree comes first, and  then
come the fruits.

The scholastics admit that a mere external and superficial performance of
the Law without sincerity and good will is plain hypocrisy. Judas acted like
the other disciples. What was wrong with Judas? Mark what Rome
answers, “Judas was a reprobate. His motives were perverse, therefore his
works were hypocritical and no good.” Well, well. Rome does admit, after
all, that works in themselves do not justify unless they issue from a
sincere heart. Why do our opponents not profess the same truth in
spiritual matters? There, above all, faith must precede everything. The
heart must be purified by faith before a person can lift a finger to please

There are two classes of doers of the Law, true doers and hypocritical doers.
The true doers of the Law are those who are moved by faith in Christ to do
the Law. The hypocritical doers of the Law are those who seek to obtain
righteousness by a mechanical performance of good works while their
hearts are far removed from God. They act like the foolish carpenter who
starts with the roof when he builds a house. Instead of doing the Law,
these law-conscious hypocrites break the Law. They break the very first
commandment of God by denying His promise in Christ. They do not
worship God in faith. They worship themselves.

No wonder Paul was able to foretell the abominations that Antichrist
would bring into the Church. That Antichrists would come, Christ
Himself prophesied, Matthew 24:5, “For many shall come in my name,
saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.” Whoever seeks
righteousness by works denies God and makes himself God. He is an
Antichrist because he ascribes to his own works the omnipotent capability
of conquering sin, death, devil, hell, and the wrath of God. An Antichrist
lays claim to the honor of Christ. He is an idolater of himself. The law-
righteous person is the worst kind of infidel.

Those who intend to obtain righteousness by their own efforts do not say
in so many words: “I am God; I am Christ.” But it amounts to that. They
usurp the divinity and office of Christ. The effect is the same as if they
said, “I am Christ; I am a Savior. I save myself and others.” This is the
impression the monks give out.

The Pope is the Antichrist, because he is against Christ, because he takes
liberties with the things of God, because he lords it over the temple of God.

I cannot tell you in words how criminal it is to seek righteousness before
God without faith in Christ, by the works of the Law. It is the abomination
standing in the holy place. It deposes the Creator and deifies the creature.

The real doers of the Law are the true believers. The Holy Spirit enables
them to love God and their neighbor. But because we have only the first-
fruits of the Spirit and not the tenth-fruits, we do not observe the Law
perfectly. This imperfection of ours, however, is not imputed to us, for
Christ’s sake.

Hence, the statement of Moses, “Cursed is every one that continueth not
in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them,” is not
contrary to Paul. Moses requires perfect doers of the Law. But where will
you find them? Nowhere. Moses himself confessed that he was not a
perfect doer of the Law. He said to the Lord: “Pardon our iniquity and our
sin.” Christ alone can make us innocent of any transgression. How so?
First, by the forgiveness of our sins and the imputation of His
righteousness. Secondly, by the gift of the Holy Ghost, who engenders new
life and activity in us.

                Objections to the Doctrine of Faith Disproved

Here we shall take the time to enter upon the objections which our
opponents raise against the doctrine of faith. There are many passages in
the Bible that deal with works and the reward of works which our
opponents cite against us in the belief that these will disprove the doctrine
of faith which we teach.

The scholastics grant that according to the reasonable order of nature being
precedes doing. They grant that any act is faulty unless it proceeds from a
right motive. They grant that a person must be right before he can do
right. Why don’t they grant that the right inclination of the heart toward
God through faith in Christ must precede works?

In the eleventh chapter of the Epistle to the Hebrews we find a catalogue of
various works and deeds of the saints of the Bible. David, who killed a
lion and a bear, and defeated Goliath, is mentioned. In the heroic deeds of
David the scholastic can discover nothing more than outward
achievement. But the deeds of David must be evaluated according to the
personality of David. When we understand that David was a man of faith,
whose heart trusted in the Lord, we shall understand why he could do
such heroic deeds. David said: “The Lord that delivered me out of the paw
of the lion, and out of the paw of the bear, he will deliver me out of the
hand of this Philistine.” Again: “Thou comest to me with a sword, and
with a spear, and with a shield: but I come to thee in the name of the Lord
of hosts, the God of the armies of Israel, whom thou hast defied. This day
will the Lord deliver thee into mine hand; and I will smite thee, and take
shine head from thee.” (I Samuel 17:37, 45, 46.) Before David could
achieve a single heroic deed he was already a man beloved of God, strong
and constant in faith.

Of Abel it is said in the same Epistle: “By faith Abel offered unto God a
more excellent sacrifice than Cain.” When the scholastics come upon the
parallel passage in Genesis 4:4 they get no further than the words: “And
the Lord had respect unto Abel and to his offering.” “Aha!” they cry. “See,
God has respect to offerings. Works do justify.” With mud in their eyes
they cannot see that the text says in Genesis that the Lord had respect to
the person of Abel first. Abel pleased the Lord because of his faith. Because
the person of Abel pleased the Lord, the offering of Abel pleased the Lord
also. The Epistle to the Hebrews expressly states: “By faith Abel offered
unto God a more excellent sacrifice.”

In our dealings with God the work is worth nothing without faith, for
“without faith it is impossible to please him.” (Hebrews 11:6.) The sacrifice
of Abel was better than the sacrifice of Cain, because Abel had faith. As to
Cain he had no faith or trust in God’s grace, but strutted about in his own
fancied worth. When God refused to recognize Cain’s worth, Cain got
angry at God and at Abel.
The Holy Spirit speaks of faith in different ways in the Sacred Scriptures.
Sometimes He speaks of faith independently of other matters. When the
Scriptures speak of faith in the absolute or abstract, faith refers to
justification directly. But when the Scripture speaks of rewards and works
it speaks of compound or relative faith. We will furnish some examples.
Galatians 5:6, “Faith which worketh by love.” Leviticus 18:5, “Which if a
man do, he shall live in them.” Matthew 19:17, “If thou wilt enter into
life, keep the commandments.” Psalm 37:27, “Depart from evil, and do
good.” In these and other passages where mention is made of doing, the
Scriptures always speak of a faithful doing, a doing inspired by faith. “Do
this and thou shalt live,” means: First have faith in Christ, and Christ will
enable you to do and to live.

In the Word of God all things that are attributed to works are attributable
to faith. Faith is the divinity of works. Faith permeates all the deeds of the
believer, as Christ’s divinity permeated His humanity. Abraham was
accounted righteous because faith pervaded his whole personality and his
every action.

When you read how the fathers, prophets, and kings accomplished great
deeds, remember to explain them as the Epistle to the Hebrews accounts
for them: “Who through faith subdued kingdoms, wrought righteousness,
obtained promises, stopped the mouths of lions.” (Hebrews 11:33.) In this
way will we correctly interpret all those passages that seem to support the
righteousness of works. The Law is truly observed only through faith.
Hence, every “holy,” “moral” law-worker is accursed.

Supposing that this explanation will not satisfy the scholastics, supposing
that they should completely wrap me up in their arguments (they cannot
do it), I would rather be wrong and give all credit to Christ alone. Here is
Christ. Paul, Christ’s apostle, declares that “Christ hath redeemed us from
the curse of the law, being made a curse for us.” (Gal. 3:13.) I hear with my
own ears that I cannot be saved except by the blood and death of Christ. I
conclude, therefore, that it is up to Christ to overcome my sins, and not up
to the Law, or my own efforts. If He is the price of my redemption, if He
was made sin for my justification, I don’t give a care if you quote me a
thousand Scripture passages for the righteousness of works against the
righteousness of faith. I have the Author and Lord of the Scriptures on my
side. I would rather believe Him than all that riffraff of “pious” law-

  VERSE 11. But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God,
  it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith.

The Apostle draws into his argument the testimony of the Prophet
Habakkuk: “The just shall live by his faith.” This passage carries much
weight because it eliminates the Law and the deeds of the Law as factors in
the process of our justification.

The scholastics misconstrue this passage by saying: “The just shall live by
faith, if it is a working faith, or a faith formed and performed by charitable
works.” Their annotation is a forgery. To speak of formed or unformed
faith, a sort of double faith, is contrary to the Scriptures. If charitable
works can form and perfect faith I am forced to say eventually that
charitable deeds constitute the essential factor in the Christian religion.
Christ and His benefits would be lost to us.

  VERSE 12. And the law is not of faith.

In direct opposition to the scholastics Paul declares: “The law is not of
faith.” What is this charity the scholastics talk so much about? Does not
the Law command charity? The fact is the Law commands nothing but
charity, as we may gather from the following Scripture passages: “Thou
shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and
with all thy might” (Deut. 6:5.) “Strewing mercy unto thousands of them
that love me, and keep my commandments.” (Exodus 20:6.) “On these
two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” (Matt. 22:40.) If
the law requires charity, charity is part of the Law and not of faith. Since
Christ has displaced the Law which commands charity, it follows that
charity has been abrogated with the Law as a factor in our justification, and
only faith is left.

  VERSE 12. But, The man that doeth them shall live in them.

Paul undertakes to explain the difference between the righteousness of the
Law and the righteousness of faith. The righteousness of the Law is the
fulfillment of the Law according to the passage: “The man that doeth them
shall live in them.” The righteousness of faith is to believe the Gospel
according to the passage: “The just shall live by faith.” The Law is a
statement of debit, the Gospel a statement of credit. By this distinction Paul
explains why charity which is the commandment of the Law cannot
justify, because the Law contributes nothing to our justification.

Indeed, works do follow after faith, but faith is not therefore a meritorious
work. Faith is a gift. The character and limitations of the Law must be
rigidly maintained.

When we believe in Christ we live by faith. When we believe in the Law
we may be active enough but we have no life. The function of the Law is
not to give life; the function of the Law is to kill. True, the Law says: “The
man that doeth them shall live in them.” But where is the person who
can do “them,” i.e., love God with all his heart, soul, and mind, and his
neighbor as himself?

Paul has nothing against those who are justified by faith and therefore are
true doers of the Law. He opposes those who think they can fulfill the Law
when in reality they can only sin against the Law by trying to obtain
righteousness by the Law. The Law demands that we fear, love, and
worship God with a true faith. The law-workers fail to do this. Instead,
they invent new modes of worship and new kinds of works which God
never commanded. They provoke His anger according to the passage: “But
in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of
men.” (Matthew 15:9.) Hence, the law-righteous workers are downright
rebels against God, and idolaters who constantly sin against the first
commandment. In short, they are no good at-all though outwardly they
seem to be extremely solicitous of the honor of God.

We who are justified by faith as the saints of old, may be under the Law,
but we are not under the curse of the Law because sin is not imputed to us
for Christ’s sake. If the Law cannot be fulfilled by the believers, if sin
continues to cling to them despite their love for God, what can you expect
of people who are not yet justified by faith, who are still enemies of God
and His Word, like the unbelieving law-workers? It goes to show how
impossible it is for those who have not been justified by faith to fulfill the

  VERSE 13. Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being
  made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth
  on a tree.

Jerome and his present-day followers rack their miserable brains over this
comforting passage in an effort to save Christ from the fancied insult of
being called a curse. They say: “This quotation from Moses does not apply
to Christ. Paul is taking liberties with Moses by generalizing the statements
in Deuteronomy 21:23. Moses has ‘he that is hanged.’ Paul puts it ‘every
one that hangeth.’ On the other hand, Paul omits the words ‘of God’ in
his quotation from Moses: ‘For he that is hanged is accursed of God.’
Moses speaks of a criminal who is worthy of death.” “How,” our
opponents ask, “can this passage be applied to the holy Christ as if He
were accursed of God and worthy to be hanged?” This piece of exegesis
may impress the naive as a zealous attempt to defend the honor and
glory of Christ. Let us see what Paul has in mind.

Paul does not say that Christ was made a curse for Himself. The accent is
on the two words “for us.” Christ is personally innocent. Personally, He
did not deserve to be hanged for any crime of His own doing. But because
Christ took the place of others who were sinners, He was hanged like any
other transgressor. The Law of Moses leaves no loopholes. It says that a
transgressor should be hanged. Who are the other sinners? We are. The
sentence of death and everlasting damnation had long been pronounced
over us. But Christ took all our sins and died for them on the Cross. “He
was numbered with the transgressors; and he bare the sin of many, and
made intercession for the transgressors.” (Isaiah 53:12.)

All the prophets of old said that Christ should be the greatest transgressor,
murderer, adulterer, thief, blasphemer that ever was or ever could be on
earth. When He took the sins of the whole world upon Himself, Christ
was no longer an innocent person. He was a sinner burdened with the sins
of a Paul who was a blasphemer; burdened with the sins of a Peter who
denied Christ; burdened with the sins of a David who committed adultery
and murder, and gave the heathen occasion to laugh at the Lord. In short,
Christ was charged with the sins of all men, that He should pay for them
with His own blood. The curse struck Him. The Law found Him among
sinners. He was not only in the company of sinners. He had gone so far as
to invest Himself with the flesh and blood of sinners. So the Law judged
and hanged Him for a sinner.

In separating Christ from us sinners and holding Him up as a holy
exemplar, errorists rob us of our best comfort. They misrepresent Him as a
threatening tyrant who is ready to slaughter us at the slightest

I am told that it is preposterous and wicked to call the Son of God a cursed
sinner. I answer: If you deny that He is a condemned sinner, you are forced
to deny that Christ died. It is not less preposterous to say, the Son of God
died, than to say, the Son of God was a sinner.

John the Baptist called Him “the lamb of God, which taketh away the sin
of the world.” Being the unspotted Lamb of God, Christ was personally
innocent. But because He took the sins of the world His sinlessness was
defiled with the sinfulness of the world. Whatever sins I, you, all of us
have committed or shall commit, they are Christ’s sins as if He had
committed them Himself. Our sins have to be Christ’s sins or we shall
perish forever.

Isaiah declares of Christ: “The Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us
all.” We have no right to minimize the force of this declaration. God does
not amuse Himself with words. What a relief for a Christian to know that
Christ is covered all over with my sins, your sins, and the sins of the
whole world.

The papists invented their own doctrine of faith. They say charity creates
and adorns their faith. By stripping Christ of our sins, by making Him
sinless, they cast our sins back at us, and make Christ absolutely worthless
to us. What sort of charity is this? If that is a sample of their vaunted
charity we want none of it.

Our merciful Father in heaven saw how the Law oppressed us and how
impossible it was for us to get out from under the curse of the Law. He
therefore sent His only Son into the world and said to Him: “You are now
Peter, the liar; Paul, the persecutor; David, the adulterer; Adam, the
disobedient; the thief on the cross. You, My Son, must pay the world’s
iniquity.” The Law growls: “All right. If Your Son is taking the sin of the
world, I see no sins anywhere else but in Him. He shall die on the Cross.”
And the Law kills Christ. But we go free.

The argument of the Apostle against the righteousness of the Law is
impregnable. If Christ bears our sins, we do not bear them. But if Christ is
innocent of our sins and does not bear them, we must bear them, and we
shall die in our sins. “But thanks be to God, which giveth us the victory
through our Lord Jesus Christ.”

Let us see how Christ was able to gain the victory over our enemies. The
sins of the whole world, past, present, and future, fastened themselves
upon Christ and condemned Him. But because Christ is God He had an
everlasting and unconquerable righteousness. These two, the sin of the
world and the righteousness of God, met in a death struggle. Furiously the
sin of the world assailed the righteousness of God. Righteousness is
immortal and invincible. On the other hand, sin is a mighty tyrant who
subdues all men. This tyrant pounces on Christ. But Christ’s righteousness
is unconquerable. The result is inevitable. Sin is defeated and
righteousness triumphs and reigns forever.

In the same manner was death defeated. Death is emperor of the world.
He strikes down kings, princes, all men. He has an idea to destroy all life.
But Christ has immortal life, and life immortal gained the victory over
death. Through Christ death has lost her sting. Christ is the Death of

The curse of God waged a similar battle with the eternal mercy of God in
Christ. The curse meant to condemn God’s mercy. But it could not do it
because the mercy of God is everlasting. The curse had to give way. If the
mercy of God in Christ had lost out, God Himself would have lost out,
which, of course, is impossible.

“Christ,” says Paul, “spoiled principalities and powers, He made a show of
them openly, triumphing over them in it.” (Col. 2:15.) They cannot harm
those who hide in Christ. Sin, death, the wrath of God, hell, the devil are
mortified in Christ. Where Christ is near the powers of evil must keep
their distance. St. John says: “And this is the victory that overcometh the
world, even our faith.” (I John 5:4.)

You may now perceive why it is imperative to believe and confess the
divinity of Christ. To overcome the sin of a whole world, and death, and
the wrath of God was no work for any creature. The power of sin and
death could be broken only by a greater power. God alone could abolish
sin, destroy death, and take away the curse of the Law. God alone could
bring righteousness, life, and mercy to light. In attributing these
achievements to Christ the Scriptures pronounce Christ to be God forever.
The article of justification is indeed fundamental. If we remain sound in
this one article, we remain sound in all the other articles of the Christian
faith. When we teach justification by faith in Christ we confess at the same
time that Christ is God.

I cannot get over the blindness of the Pope’s theologians. To imagine that
the mighty forces of sin, death, and the curse can be vanquished by the
righteousness of man’s paltry works, by fasting, pilgrimages, masses, vows,
and such gewgaws. These blind leaders of the blind turn the poor people
over to the mercy of sin, death, and the devil. What chance has a
defenseless human creature against these powers of darkness? They train
sinners who are ten times worse than any thief, whore, murderer. The
divine power of God alone can destroy sin and death, and create
righteousness and life.

When we hear that Christ was made a curse for us, let us believe it with
joy and assurance. By faith Christ changes places with us. He gets our sins,
we get His holiness.

By faith alone can we become righteous, for faith invests us with the
sinlessness of Christ. The more fully we believe this, the fuller will be our
joy. If you believe that sin, death, and the curse are void, why, they are
null, zero. Whenever sin and death make you nervous write it down as
an illusion of the devil. There is no sin now, no curse, no death, no devil
because Christ has done away with them. This fact is sure. There is
nothing wrong with the fact. The defect lies in our lack of faith.

In the Apostolic Creed we confess: “I believe in the holy Christian
Church.” That means, I believe that there is no sin, no curse, no evil in
the Church of God. Faith says: “I believe that.” But if you want to believe
your eyes you will find many shortcomings and offenses in the members
of the holy Church. You see them succumb to temptation, you see them
weak in faith, you see them giving way to anger, envy, and other evil
dispositions. “How can the Church be holy?” you ask. It is with the
Christian Church as it is with the individual Christian. If I examine myself
I find enough unholiness to shock me. But when I look at Christ in me I
find that I am altogether holy. And so it is with the Church.

Holy Writ does not say that Christ was under the curse. It says directly that
Christ was made a curse. In II Corinthians 5:21 Paul writes: “For he (God)
hath made him (Christ) to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might
be made the righteousness of God in him.” Although this and similar
passages may be properly explained by saying that Christ was made a
sacrifice for the curse and for sin, yet in my judgment it is better to leave
these passages stand as they read: Christ was made sin itself; Christ was
made the curse itself. When a sinner gets wise to himself he does not only
feel miserable, he feels like misery personified; he does not only feel like a
sinner, he feels like sin itself.

To finish with this verse: All evils would have overwhelmed us, as they
shall overwhelm the unbelievers forever, if Christ had not become the
great transgressor and guilty bearer of all our sins. The sins of the world
got Him down for a moment. They came around Him like water. Of
Christ, the Old Testament Prophet complained: “Thy fierce wrath goeth
over me; thy terrors have cut me off.” (Psalm 88 16.) By Christ’s salvation
we have been delivered from the terrors of God to a life of eternal felicity.

  VERSE 14. That the blessing of Abraham might come, on the Gentiles
  through Jesus Christ.

Paul always keeps this text before him: “In thy seed shall all the nations of
the earth be blessed.” The blessing promised unto Abraham could come
upon the Gentiles only by Christ, the seed of Abraham. To become a
blessing unto all nations Christ had to be made a curse to take away the
curse from the nations of the earth. The merit that we plead, and the work
that we proffer is Christ who was made a curse for us.

Let us become expert in the art of transferring our sins, our death, and
every evil from ourselves to Christ; and Christ’s righteousness and
blessing from Christ to ourselves.

  VERSE 14. That we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.

“The promise of the Spirit” is Hebrew for “the promised Spirit.” The Spirit
spells freedom from the Law, sin, death, the curse, hell, and the judgment
of God. No merits are mentioned in connection with this promise of the
Spirit and all the blessings that go with Him. This Spirit of many blessings
is received by faith alone. Faith alone builds on the promises of God, as
Paul says in this verse.

Long ago the prophets visualized the happy changes Christ would effect in
all things. Despite the fact that the Jews had the Law of God they never
ceased to look longingly for Christ. After Moses no prophet or king added
a single law to the Book. Any changes or additions were deferred to the
time of Christ’s coming. Moses told the people: “The Lord thy God will
raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like
unto me; unto him ye shall hearken.” (Deut. 18:15.)

God’s people of old felt that the Law of Moses could not be improved
upon until the Messiah would bring better things than the Law, i.e., grace
and remission of sins.

  VERSE 15. Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but
  a man’s covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or
  addeth thereto.

After the preceding, well-taken argument, Paul offers another based on the
similarity between a man’s testament and God’s testament. A man’s
testament seems too weak a premise for the Apostle to argue from in
confirmation of so important a matter as justification. We ought to prove
earthly things by heavenly things, and not heavenly things by earthly
things. But where the earthly thing is an ordinance of God we may use it
to prove divine matters. In Matthew 7:11 Christ Himself argued from
earthly to heavenly things when He said: “If ye then, being evil, know
how to give good gifts to your children; how much more shall your Father
which is in heaven give good things to them that ask him?”

To come to Paul’s argument. Civil law, which is God’s ordinance,
prohibits tampering with any testament of man. Any person’s last will
and testament must be respected. Paul asks: “Why is it that man’s last will
is scrupulously respected and not God’s testament? You would not think
of breaking faith with a man’s testament. Why do you not keep faith with
God’s testament?”

The Apostle says that he is speaking after the manner of men. He means
to say: “I will give you an illustration from the customs of men. If a man’s
last will is respected. and it is, how much more ought the testament of
God be honored: ‘In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed.’
When Christ died, this testament was sealed by His blood. After His death
the testament was opened, it was published to the nations. No man ought
to alter God’s testament as the false apostles do who substitute the Law
and traditions of men for the testament of God.”

As the false prophets tampered with God’s testament in the days of Paul,
so many do in our day. They will observe human laws punctiliously, but
the laws of God they transgress without the flicker of an eyelid. But the
time will come when they will find out that it is no joke to pervert the
testament of God.

  VERSE 16. Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He
  saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed,
  which is Christ.

The word testament is another name for the promise that God made unto
Abraham concerning Christ. A testament is not a law, but an inheritance.
Heirs do not look for laws and assessments when they open a last will;
they look for grants and favors. The testament which God made out to
Abraham did not contain laws. It contained promises of great spiritual

The promises were made in view of Christ, in one seed, not in many
seeds. The Jews will not accept this interpretation. They insist that the
singular “seed” is put for the plural “seeds.” We prefer the interpretation
of Paul, who makes a fine case for Christ and for us out of the singular
“seed,” and is after all inspired to do so by the Holy Ghost.

  VERSE 17. And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before
  of God in Christ, the law which was four hundred and thirty years
  after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.

The Jews assert that God was not satisfied with His promises, but after four
hundred and thirty years He gave the Law. “God,” they say, “must have
mistrusted His own promises, and considered them inadequate for
salvation. Therefore He added to His promises something better, the Law.
The Law,” they say, “canceled the promises.”

Paul answers: “The Law was given four hundred and thirty years after the
promise was made to Abraham. The Law could not cancel the promise
because the promise was the testament of God, confirmed by God in Christ
many years before the Law. What God has once promised He does not take
back. Every promise of God is a ratified promise.”

Why was the Law added to the promise? Not to serve as a medium by
which the promise might be obtained. The Law was added for these
reasons: That there might be in the world a special people, rigidly
controlled by the Law, a people out of which Christ should be born in due
time; and that men burdened by many laws might sigh and long for Him,
their Redeemer, the seed of Abraham. Even the ceremonies prescribed by
the Law foreshadowed Christ. Therefore the Law was never meant to
cancel the promise of God. The Law was meant to confirm the promise
until the time should come when God would open His testament in the
Gospel of Jesus Christ.

God did well in giving the promise so many years before the Law, that it
may never be said that righteousness is granted through the Law and not
through the promise. If God had meant for us to be justified by the Law,
He would have given the Law four hundred and thirty years before the
promise, at least He would have given the Law at the same time He gave
the promise. But He never breathed a word about the Law until four
hundred years after. The promise is therefore better than the Law. The
Law does not cancel the promise, but faith in the promised Christ cancels
the Law.

The Apostle is careful to mention the exact number of four hundred and
thirty years. The wide divergence in the time between the promise and the
Law helps to clinch Paul’s argument that righteousness is not obtained by
the Law.

Let me illustrate. A man of great wealth adopts a strange lad for his son.
Remember, he does not owe the lad anything. In due time he appoints the
lad heir to his entire fortune. Several years later the old man asks the lad
to do something for him. And the young lad does it. Can the lad then go
around and say that he deserved the inheritance by his obedience to the
old man’s request ? How can anybody say that righteousness is obtained by
obedience to the Law when the Law was given four hundred and thirty
years after God’s promise of the blessing?

One thing is certain, Abraham was never justified by the Law, for the
simple reason that the Law was not in his day. If the Law was non-existent
how could Abraham obtain righteousness by the Law? Abraham had
nothing else to go by but the promise. This promise he believed and that
was counted unto him for righteousness. If the father obtained
righteousness through faith, the children get it the same way.

We use the argument of time also. We say our sins were taken away by the
death of Christ fifteen hundred years ago, long before there were any
religious orders, canons, or rules of penance, merits, etc. What did people
do about their sins before these new inventions were hatched up?

Paul finds his arguments for the righteousness of faith everywhere. Even
the element of time serves to build his case against the false apostles. Let
us fortify our conscience with similar arguments. They help us in the
trials of our faith. They turn our attention from the Law to the promises,
from sin to righteousness; from death to life.

It is not for nothing that Paul bears down on this argument. He foresaw
this confusion of the promise and the Law creeping into the Church.
Accustom yourself to separate Law and Gospel even in regard to time.
When the Law comes to pay your conscience a visit, say: “Mister Law, you
come too soon. The four hundred and thirty years aren’t up yet. When
they are up, you come again. Won’t you ?”

  VERSE 18. For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of

In Romans 4:14, the Apostle writes: “For if they which are made of the
law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect.” It
cannot be otherwise. That the Law is something entirely different from the
promise is plain. The Law thunders: “Thou shalt, thou shalt not.” The
promise of the “seed” pleads: “Take this gift of God.” If the inheritance of
the gifts of God were obtained by the Law, God would be a liar. We would
have the right to ask Him: “Why did you make this promise in the first
place: ‘In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed’? Why did
you not say: ‘In thy works thou shalt be blessed’?”

  VERSE 18. But God gave it to Abraham by promise.

So much is certain, before the Law ever existed, God gave Abraham the
inheritance or blessing by the promise. In other words, God granted unto
Abraham remission of sins, righteousness, salvation, and everlasting life.
And not only to Abraham but to all believers, because God said: “In thy
seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed.” The blessing was given
unconditionally. The Law had no chance to butt in because Moses was not
yet born. “How then can you say that righteousness is obtained by the Law?”

The Apostle now goes to work to explain the province and purpose of the

  VERSE 19. Wherefore then serveth the law?

The question naturally arises: If the Law was not given for righteousness
or salvation, why was it given? Why did God give the Law in the first
place if it cannot justify a person?

The Jews believed if they kept the Law they would be saved. When they
heard that the Gospel proclaimed a Christ who had come into the world to
save sinners and not the righteous; when they heard that sinners were to
enter the kingdom of heaven before the righteous, the Jews were very
much put out. They murmured: “These last have wrought but one hour,
and thou hast made them equal unto us, which have borne the burden
and heat of the day.” (Matthew 20:12.) They complained that the heathen
who at one time had been worshipers of idols obtained grace without the
drudgery of the Law that was theirs.

Today we hear the same complaints. “What was the use of our having
lived in a cloister, twenty, thirty, forty years; what was the sense of having
vowed chastity, poverty, obedience; what good are all the masses and
canonical hours that we read; what profit is there in fasting, praying, etc.,
if any man or woman, any beggar or scour woman is to be made equal to
us, or even be considered more acceptable unto God than we?”

Reason takes offense at the statement of Paul: “The law was added because
of transgressions.” People say that Paul abrogated the Law, that he is a
radical, that he blasphemed God when he said that. People say: “We might
as well live like wild people if the Law does not count. Let us abound in
sin that grace may abound. Let us do evil that good may come of it.”

What are we to do? Such scoffing distresses us, but we cannot stop it.
Christ Himself was accused of being a blasphemer and rebel. Paul and all
the other apostles were told the same things. Let the scoffers slander us, let
them spare us not. But we must not on their account keep silent. We must
speak frankly in order that afflicted consciences may find surcease. Neither
are we to pay any attention to the foolish and ungodly people for abusing
our doctrine. They are the kind that would scoff, Law or no Law. Our first
consideration must be the comfort of troubled consciences, that they may
not perish with the multitudes.

When he saw that some were offended at his doctrine, while others found
in it encouragement to live after the flesh, Paul comforted himself with
the thought that it was his duty to preach the Gospel to the elect of God,
and that for their sake he must endure all things. Like Paul we also do all
these things for the sake of God’s elect. As for the scoffers and skeptics, I
am so disgusted with them that in all my life I would not open my mouth
for them once. I wish that they were back there where they belong under
the iron heel of the Pope.

People foolish but wise in their conceits jump to the conclusion: If the Law
does not justify, it is good for nothing. How about that? Because money
does not justify, would you say that money is good for nothing? Because
the eyes do not justify, would you have them taken out? Because the Law
does not justify it does not follow that the Law is without value. We must
find and define the proper purpose of the Law. We do not offhand
condemn the Law because we say it does not justify.

We say with Paul that the Law is good if it is used properly. Within its
proper sphere the Law is an excellent thing. But if we ascribe to the Law
functions for which it was never intended, we pervert not only the Law
but also the Gospel.
It is the universal impression that righteousness is obtained through the
deeds of the Law. This impression is instinctive and therefore doubly
dangerous. Gross sins and vices may be recognized or else repressed by the
threat of punishment. But this sin, this opinion of man’s own
righteousness refuses to be classified as sin. It wants to be esteemed as
high-class religion. Hence, it constitutes the mighty influence of the devil
over the entire world. In order to point out the true office of the Law, and
thus to stamp out that false impression of the righteousness of the Law,
Paul answers the question: “Wherefore then serveth the Law?” with the

  VERSE 19. It was added because of transgressions.

All things differ. Let everything serve its unique purpose. Let the sun
shine by day, the moon and the stars by night. Let the sea furnish fish, the
earth grain, the woods trees, etc. Let the Law also serve its unique purpose.
It must not step out of character and take the place of anything else. What
is the function of the Law? “Transgression,” answers the Apostle.

                      The Twofold Purpose of the Law

The Law has a twofold purpose. One purpose is civil. God has ordained
civil laws to punish crime. Every law is given to restrain sin. Does it not
then make men righteous? No. In refraining from murder, adultery,
theft, or other sins, I do so under compulsion because I fear the jail, the
noose, the electric chair. These restrain me as iron bars restrain a lion and
a bear. Otherwise they would tear everything to pieces. Such forceful
restraint cannot be regarded as righteousness, rather as an indication of
unrighteousness. As a wild beast is tied to keep it from running amuck, so
the Law bridles mad and furious man to keep him from running wild.
The need for restraint shows plainly enough that those who need the Law
are not righteous, but wicked men who are fit to be tied. No, the Law does
not justify.

  The first purpose of the Law, accordingly, is to restrain the wicked.
  The devil gets people into all kinds of scrapes. Therefore God
  instituted governments, parents, laws, restrictions, and civil
  ordinances. At least they help to tie the devil’s hands so that he does
  not rage up and down the earth. This civil restraint by the Law is
  intended by God for the preservation of all things, particularly for the
  good of the Gospel that it should not be hindered too much by the
  tumult of the wicked. But Paul is not now treating of this civil use
  and function of the Law.

  The second purpose of the Law is spiritual and divine. Paul describes
  this spiritual purpose of the Law in the words, “Because of
  transgressions,” i.e., to reveal to a person his sin, blindness, misery,
  his ignorance, hatred, and contempt of God, his death, hell, and

This is the principal purpose of the Law and its most valuable
contribution. As long as a person is not a murderer, adulterer, thief, he
would swear that he is righteous. How is God going to humble such a
person except by the Law? The Law is the hammer of death, the thunder of
hell, and the lightning of God’s wrath to bring down the proud and
shameless hypocrites. When the Law was instituted on Mount Sinai it was
accompanied by lightning, by storms, by the sound of trumpets, to tear to
pieces that monster called self-righteousness. As long as a person thinks
he is right he is going to be incomprehensibly proud and presumptuous.
He is going to hate God, despise His grace and mercy, and ignore the
promises in Christ. The Gospel of the free forgiveness of sins through
Christ will never appeal to the self-righteous.

This monster of self-righteousness, this stiff-necked beast, needs a big axe.
And that is what the Law is, a big axe. Accordingly, the proper use and
function of the Law is to threaten until the conscience is scared stiff.

The awful spectacle at Mount Sinai portrayed the proper use of the Law.  When
the children of Israel came out of Egypt a feeling of singular  holiness
possessed them. They boasted: “We are the people of God. All  that the Lord
hath spoken we will do.” (Ex. 19:8) This feeling of holiness  was heightened
when Moses ordered them to wash their clothes, to refrain  from their wives,
and to prepare themselves all around. The third day came  and Moses led the
people out of their tents to the foot of the mountain into  the presence of
the Lord. What happened? When the children of Israel saw  the whole mountain
burning and smoking, the black clouds rent by fierce  lightning flashing up
and down in the inky darkness, when they heard the  sound of the trumpet
blowing louder and longer, shattered by the roll of  thunder, they were so
frightened that they begged Moses: “Speak thou with  us, and we will hear: but
let not God speak with us, lest we die.” (Ex. 20:19.)  I ask you, what good
did their scrubbing, their snow-white clothes, and  their continence do them?
No good at all. Not a single one could stand in  the presence of the glorious
Lord. Stricken by the terror of God, they fled  back into their tents, as if
the devil were after them.

The Law is meant to produce the same effect today which it produced at
Mount Sinai long ago. I want to encourage all who fear God, especially
those who intend to become ministers of the Gospel, to learn from the
Apostle the proper use of the Law. I fear that after our time the right
handling of the Law will become a lost art. Even now, although we
continually explain the separate functions of the Law and the Gospel, we
have those among us who do not understand how the Law should be
used. What will it be like when we are dead and gone?

We want it understood that we do not reject the Law as our opponents
claim. On the contrary, we uphold the Law. We say the Law is good if it is
used for the purposes for which it was designed, to check civil
transgression, and to magnify spiritual transgressions. The Law is also a
light like the Gospel. But instead of revealing the grace of God,
righteousness, and life, the Law brings sin, death, and the wrath of God to
light. This is the business of the Law, and here the business of the Law
ends, and should go no further.

The business of the Gospel, on the other hand, is to quicken, to comfort, to
raise the fallen. The Gospel carries the news that God for Christ’s sake is
merciful to the most unworthy sinners, if they will only believe that
Christ by His death has delivered them from sin and everlasting death
unto grace, forgiveness, and everlasting life. By keeping in mind the
difference between the Law and the Gospel we let each perform its special
task. Of this difference between the Law and the Gospel nothing can be
discovered in the writings of the monks or scholastics, nor for that matter
in the writings of the ancient fathers. Augustine understood the difference
somewhat. Jerome and others knew nothing of it. The silence in the
Church concerning the difference between the Law and the Gospel has
resulted in untold harm. Unless a sharp distinction is maintained between
the purpose and function of the Law and the Gospel, the Christian
doctrine cannot be kept free from error.

  VERSE 19. It was added because of transgressions.

In other words, that transgressions might be recognized as such and thus
increased. When sin, death, and the wrath of God are revealed to a person
by the Law, he grows impatient, complains against God, and rebels. Before
that he was a very holy man; he worshipped and praised God; he bowed
his knees before God and gave thanks, like the Pharisee. But now that sin
and death are revealed to him by the Law he wishes there were no God.
The Law inspires hatred of God. Thus sin is not only revealed by the Law;
sin is actually increased and magnified by the Law.

The Law is a mirror to show a person what he is like, a sinner who is
guilty of death, and worthy of everlasting punishment. What is this
bruising and beating by the hand of the Law to accomplish? This, that we
may find the way to grace. The Law is an usher to lead the way to grace.
God is the God of the humble, the miserable, the afflicted. It is His nature
to exalt the humble, to comfort the sorrowing, to heal the broken-hearted,
to justify the sinners, and to save the condemned. The fatuous idea that a
person can be holy by himself denies God the pleasure of saving sinners.
God must therefore first take the sledge-hammer of the Law in His fists
and smash the beast of self-righteousness and its brood of self-confidence,
self-wisdom, self-righteousness, and self-help. When the conscience has
been thoroughly frightened by the Law it welcomes the Gospel of grace
with its message of a Savior who came into the world, not to break the
bruised reed, nor to quench the smoking flax, but to preach glad tidings to
the poor, to heal the broken-hearted, and to grant forgiveness of sins to all
the captives.

Man’s folly, however, is so prodigious that instead of embracing the  message
of grace with its guarantee of the forgiveness of sin for Christ’s  sake, man
finds himself more laws to satisfy his conscience. “If I live,” says  he, “I
will mend my life. I will do this, I will do that.” Man, if you don’t do  the
very opposite, if you don’t send Moses with the Law back to Mount  Sinai and
take the hand of Christ, pierced for your sins, you will never be  saved.

When the Law drives you to the point of despair, let it drive you a little
farther, let it drive you straight into the arms of Jesus who says: “Come
unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.”

  VERSE 19. Till the seed should come to whom the promise was made.

The Law is not to have its say indefinitely. We must know how long the
Law is to put in its licks. If it hammers away too long, no person would
and could be saved. The Law has a boundary beyond which it must not go.
How long ought the Law to hold sway? “Till the seed should come to
whom the promise was made.”
That may be taken literally to mean until the time of the Gospel. “From
the days of John the Baptist,” says Jesus, “until now the kingdom of
heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force. For all the
prophets and the law prophesied until John.” (Matthew 11:12, 13.) When
Christ came the Law and the ceremonies of Moses ceased.

Spiritually, it means that the Law is not to operate on a person after he has
been humbled and frightened by the exposure of his sins and the wrath of
God. We must then say to the Law: “Mister Law, lay off him. He has had
enough. You scared him good and proper.” Now it is the Gospel’s turn.
Now let Christ with His gracious lips talk to him of better things, grace,
peace, forgiveness of sins, and eternal life.

  VERSE 19. And it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.

The Apostle digresses a little from his immediate theme. Something
occurred to him and he throws it in by the way. It occurred to him that the
Law differs from the Gospel in another respect, in respect to authorship.
The Law was delivered by the angels, but the Gospel by the Lord Himself.
Hence, the Gospel is superior to the Law, as the word of a lord is superior
to the word of his servant.

The Law was handed down by a being even inferior to the angels, by a
middleman named Moses. Paul wants us to understand that Christ is the
mediator of a better testament than mediator Moses of the Law. Moses led
the people out of their tents to meet God. But they ran away. That is how
good a mediator Moses was.

Paul says: “How can the Law justify when that whole sanctified people of
Israel and even mediator Moses trembled at the voice of God? What kind
of righteousness do you call that when people run away from it and hate it
the worst way? If the Law could justify, people would love the Law. But
look at the children of Israel running away from it.”

The flight of the children of Israel from Mount Sinai indicates how people
feel about the Law. They don’t like it. If this were the only argument to
prove that salvation is not by the Law, this one Bible history would do the
work. What kind of righteousness is this law-righteousness when at the
commencement exercises of the Law Moses and the scrubbed people run
away from it so fast that an iron mountain, the Red Sea even, could not
have stopped them until they were back in Egypt once again? If they could
not hear the Law, how could they ever hope to perform the Law?

If all the world had stood at the mountain, all the world would have hated
the Law and fled from it as the children of Israel did. The whole world is
an enemy of the Law. How, then, can anyone be justified by the Law when
everybody hates the Law and its divine author?

All this goes to show how little the scholastics know about the Law. They  do
not consider its spiritual effect and purpose, which is not to justify or to
pacify afflicted consciences, but to increase sin, to terrify the conscience,
and to produce wrath. In their ignorance the papists spout about man’s  good
will and right judgment, and man’s capacity to perform the Law of  God. Ask
the people of Israel who were present at the presentation of the  Law on Mount
Sinai whether what the scholastics say is true. Ask David,  who often
complains in the Psalms that he was cast away from God and in  hell, that he
was frantic about his sin, and sick at the thought of the wrath  and judgment
of God. No, the Law does not justify.

  VERSE 20. Now a mediator is not a mediator of one.

Here the Apostle briefly compares the two mediators: Moses and Christ.
“A mediator,” says Paul, “is not a mediator of one.” He is necessarily a
mediator of two: The offender and the offended. Moses was such a
mediator between the Law and the people who were offended at the Law.
They were offended at the Law because they did not understand its
purpose. That was the veil which Moses put over his face. The people
were also offended at the Law because they could not look at the bare face
of Moses. It shone with the glory of God. When Moses addressed the
people he had to cover his face with that veil of his. They could not listen
to their mediator Moses without another mediator, the veil. The Law had
to change its face and voice. In other words, the Law had to be made
tolerable to the people.

Thus covered, the Law no longer spoke to the people in its undisguised
majesty. It became more tolerable to the conscience. This explains why
men fail to understand the Law properly, with the result that they become
secure and presumptuous hypocrites. One of two things has to be done:
Either the Law must be covered with a veil and then it loses its full
effectiveness, or it must be unveiled and then the full blast of its force
kills. Man cannot stand the Law without a veil over it. Hence, we are
forced either to look beyond the Law to Christ, or we go through life as
shameless hypocrites and secure sinners.

Paul says: “A mediator is not a mediator of one.” Moses could not be a
mediator of God only, for God needs no mediator. Again, Moses could not  be a
mediator of the people only. He was a mediator between God and the  people. It
is the office of a mediator to conciliate the party that is offended  and to
placate the party that is the offender. However, Moses’ mediation  consisted
only in changing the tone of the Law to make it more tolerable  to the people.
Moses was merely a mediator of the veil. He could not  supply the ability to
perform the Law.

What do you suppose would have happened if the Law had been given
without a mediator and the people had been denied the services of a go-
between? The people would have perished, or in case they had escaped
they would have required the services of another mediator to preserve
them alive and to keep the Law in force. Moses came along and he was
made the mediator. He covered his face with a veil. But that is as much as
he could do. He could not deliver men’s consciences from the terror of the
Law. The sinner needs a better mediator.

That better mediator is Jesus Christ. He does not change the voice of the
Law, nor does He hide the Law with a veil. He takes the full blast of the
wrath of the Law and fulfills its demands most meticulously.

Of this better Mediator Paul says: “A mediator is not a mediator of one.”
We are the offending party; God is the party offended. The offense is of
such a nature that God cannot pardon it. Neither can we render adequate
satisfaction for our offenses. There is discord between God and us. Could
not God revoke His Law? No. How about running away from God? It
cannot be done. It took Christ to come between us and God and to
reconcile God to us. How did Christ do it? “Blotting out the handwriting
of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out
of the way, nailing it to his cross.” (Col. 2:14.)

This one word, “mediator,” is proof enough that the Law cannot justify.
Otherwise we should not need a mediator.

In Christian theology the Law does not justify. In fact it has the contrary
effect. The Law alarms us, it magnifies our sins until we begin to hate the
Law and its divine Author. Would you call this being justified by the Law?

Can you imagine a more arrant outrage than to hate God and to abhor His
Law? What an excellent Law it is. Listen: “I am the Lord thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
Thou shalt have no other gods. . .showing mercy unto thousands . . .
honor thy father and thy mother; that thy days may be long upon the land. . .”
(Ex. 20:2, 3, 6, 12.) Are these not excellent laws, perfect wisdom? “Let
not God speak with us, lest we die,” cried the children of Israel. Is it not
amazing that a person should refuse to hear things that are good for him?
Any person would be glad to hear, I should think, that he has a gracious
God who shows mercy unto thousands. Is it not amazing that people hate
the Law that promotes their safety and welfare, e.g., “Thou shalt not kill;
thou shalt not commit adultery; thou shalt not steal”?

The Law can do nothing for us except to arouse the conscience. Before the
Law comes to me I feel no sin. But when the Law comes, sin, death, and
hell are revealed to me. You would not call this being made righteous.
You would call it being condemned to death and hell-fire.

  VERSE 20. But God is one.

God does not offend anybody, therefore He needs no mediator. But we
offend God, therefore we need a mediator. And we need a better mediator
than Moses. We need Christ.

  VERSE 21. Is the law then against the promises of God?

Before he digressed Paul stated that the Law does not justify. Shall we then
discard the Law? No, no. It supplies a certain need. It supplies men with a
needed realization of their sinfulness. Now arises another question: If the
Law does no more than to reveal sin, does it not oppose the promises of
God? The Jews believed that by the restraint and discipline of the Law the
promises of God would be hastened, in fact earned by them.

Paul answers: “Not so. On the contrary, if we pay too much attention to
the Law the promises of God will be slowed up. How can God fulfill His
promises to a people that hates the Law?”

  VERSE 21. God forbid.

God never said to Abraham: “In thee shall all the nations of the earth be
blessed because thou hast kept the Law.” When Abraham was still
uncircumcised and without the Law or any law, indeed, when he was still
an idol worshiper, God said to him: “Get thee out of thy country, etc.; I am
thy shield, etc.; In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed.”
These are unconditional promises which God freely made to Abraham
without respect to works.

This is aimed especially at the Jews who think that the promises of God
are impeded by their sins. Paul says: “The Lord is not slack concerning His
promises because of our sins, or hastens His promises because of any merit
on our part.” God’s promises are not influenced by our attitudes. They rest
in His goodness and mercy.

Just because the Law increases sin, it does not therefore obstruct the
promises of God. The Law confirms the promises, in that it prepares a
person to look for the fulfillment of the promises of God in Christ.

The proverb has it that Hunger is the best cook. The Law makes afflicted
consciences hungry for Christ. Christ tastes good to them. Hungry hearts
appreciate Christ. Thirsty souls are what Christ wants. He invites them:
“Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you
rest.” Christ’s benefits are so precious that He will dispense them only to
those who need them and really desire them.

  VERSE 21. For if there had been a law given which could have given
  life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.

The Law cannot give life. It kills. The Law does not justify a person before
God; it increases sin. The Law does not secure righteousness; it hinders
righteousness. The Apostle declares emphatically that the Law of itself
cannot save.

Despite the intelligibility of Paul’s statement, our enemies fail to grasp it.
Otherwise they would not emphasize free will, natural strength, the works
of supererogation, etc. To escape the charge of forgery they always have
their convenient annotation handy, that Paul is referring only to the
ceremonial and not to the moral law. But Paul includes all laws. He
expressly says: “If there had been a law given.”

There is no law by which righteousness may be obtained, not a single one.
Why not?

  VERSE 22. But the Scripture hath concluded all under sin.

Where? First in the promises concerning Christ in Genesis 3:15 and in
Genesis 22:18, which speak of the seed of the woman and the seed of
Abraham. The fact that these promises were made unto the fathers
concerning Christ implies that the fathers were subject to the curse of sin
and eternal death. Otherwise why the need of promises?

Next, Holy Writ “concludes” all under sin in this passage from Paul: “For
as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse.” Again, in the
passage which the Apostle quotes from Deuteronomy 27:26, “Cursed is
every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book
of the law to do them.” This passage clearly submits all men to the curse,
not only those who sin openly against the Law, but also those who
sincerely endeavor to perform the Law, inclusive of monks, friars,
hermits, etc.

The conclusion is inevitable: Faith alone justified without works. If the Law
itself cannot justify, much less can imperfect performance of the Law or the
works of the Law, justify.

  VERSE 22. That the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to
  them that believe.

The Apostle stated before that “the Scripture hath concluded all under
sin.” Forever? No, only until the promise should be fulfilled. The
promise, you will recall, is the inheritance itself or the blessing promised
to Abraham, deliverance from the Law, sin, death, and the devil, and the
free gift of grace, righteousness, salvation, and eternal life. This promise,
says Paul, is not obtained by any merit, by any law, or by any work. This
promise is given. To whom? To those who believe. In whom? In Jesus

  VERSE 23. But before faith came.

The Apostle proceeds to explain the service which the Law is to render.
Previously Paul had said that the Law was given to reveal the wrath and
death of God upon all sinners. Although the Law kills, God brings good
out of evil. He uses the Law to bring life. God saw that the universal
illusion of self-righteousness could not be put down in any other way but
by the Law. The Law dispels all self-illusions. It puts the fear of God in a
man. Without this fear there can be no thirst for God’s mercy. God
accordingly uses the Law for a hammer to break up the illusion of self-
righteousness, that we should despair of our own strength and efforts at

  VERSE 23. But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up
  unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.

The Law is a prison to those who have not as yet obtained grace. No
prisoner enjoys the confinement. He hates it. If he could he would smash
the prison and find his freedom at all cost. As long as he stays in prison he
refrains from evil deeds. Not because he wants to, but because he has to.
The bars and the chains restrain him. He does not regret the crime that put
him in jail. On the contrary, he is mighty sore that he cannot rob and kill
as before. If he could escape he would go right back to robbing and killing.

The Law enforces good behavior, at least outwardly. We obey the Law
because if we don’t we will be punished. Our obedience is inspired by fear.
We obey under duress and we do it resentfully. Now what kind of
righteousness is this when we refrain from evil out of fear of
punishment? Hence, the righteousness of the Law is at bottom nothing
but love of sin and hatred of righteousness.

All the same, the Law accomplishes this much, that it will outwardly at
least and to a certain extent repress vice and crime.

But the Law is also a spiritual prison, a veritable hell. When the Law
begins to threaten a person with death and the eternal wrath of God, a
man just cannot find any comfort at all. He cannot shake off at will the
nightmare of terror which the Law stirs up in his conscience. Of this terror
of the Law the Psalms furnish many glimpses.

The Law is a civil and a spiritual prison. And such it should be. For that
the Law is intended. Only the confinement in the prison of the Law must
not be unduly prolonged. It must come to an end. The freedom of faith
must succeed the imprisonment of the Law.

Happy the person who knows how to utilize the Law so that it serves the
purposes of grace and of faith. Unbelievers are ignorant of this happy
knowledge. When Cain was first shut up in the prison of the Law he felt
no pang at the fratricide he had committed. He thought he could pass it off
as an incident with a shrug of the shoulder. “Am I my brother’s keeper?”
he answered God flippantly. But when he heard the ominous words,
“What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother’s blood crieth unto me
from the ground,” Cain began to feel his imprisonment. Did he know how
to get out of prison? No. He failed to call the Gospel to his aid. He said:
“My punishment is greater than I can bear.” He could only think of the
prison. He forgot that he was brought face to face with his crime so that he
should hurry to God for mercy and for pardon. Cain remained in the
prison of the Law and despaired.

As a stone prison proves a physical handicap, so the spiritual prison of the
Law proves a chamber of torture. But this it should only be until faith be
revealed. The silly conscience must be educated to this. Talk to your
conscience. Say: “Sister, you are now in jail all right. But you don’t have to
stay there forever. It is written that we are ‘shut up unto faith which
should afterwards be revealed.’ Christ will lead you to freedom. Do not
despair like Cain, Saul, or Judas. They might have gone free if they had
called Christ to their aid. Just take it easy, Sister Conscience. It’s good
for  you to be locked up for a while. It will teach you to appreciate Christ.”

How anybody can say that he by nature loves the Law is beyond me. The
Law is a prison to be feared and hated. Any unconverted person who says
he loves the Law is a liar. He does not know what he is talking about. We
love the Law about as well as a murderer loves his gloomy cell, his
straight-jacket, and the iron bars in front of him. How then can the Law
justify us?

  VERSE 23. Shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.

We know that Paul has reference to the time of Christ’s coming. It was
then that faith and the object of faith were fully revealed. But we may
apply the historical fact to our inner life. When Christ came He abolished
the Law and brought liberty and life to light. This He continues to do in
the hearts of the believers. The Christian has a body in whose members, as
Paul says, sin dwells and wars. I take sin to mean not only the deed but
root, tree, fruit, and all. A Christian may perhaps not fall into the gross
sins of murder, adultery, theft, but he is not free from impatience,
complaints, hatreds, and blasphemy of God. As carnal lust is strong in a
young man, in a man of full age the desire for glory, and in an old man
covetousness, so impatience, doubt, and hatred of God often prevail in the
hearts of sincere Christians. Examples of these sins may be garnered from
the Psalms, Job, Jeremiah, and all the Sacred Scriptures.

Accordingly each Christian continues to experience in his heart times of
the Law and times of the Gospel. The times of the Law are discernible by
heaviness of heart, by a lively sense of sin, and a feeling of despair brought
on by the Law. These periods of the Law will come again and again as long
as we live. To mention my own case. There are many times when I find
fault with God and am impatient with Him. The wrath and the judgment
of God displease me, my wrath and impatience displease Him. Then is the
season of the Law, when “the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit
against the flesh.”

The time of grace returns when the heart is enlivened by the promise of
God’s mercy. It soliloquizes: “Why art thou cast down, O my soul? and
why art thou disquieted within me? Can you see nothing but law, sin,
death, and hell? Is there no grace, no forgiveness, no joy, peace, life,
heaven, no Christ and God? Trouble me no more, my soul. Hope in God
who has not spared His own dear Son but has given Him into death for
thy sins.” When the Law carries things too far, say: “Mister Law, you are
not the whole show. There are other and better things than you. They tell
me to trust in the Lord.”

There is a time for the Law and a time for grace. Let us study to be good
timekeepers. It is not easy. Law and grace may be miles apart in essence,
but in the heart, they are pretty close together. In the heart fear and trust,
sin and grace, Law and Gospel cross paths continually.

Whether reason hears that justification before God is obtained by grace
alone, it draws the inference that the Law is without value. The doctrine
of the Law must therefore be studied carefully lest we either reject the Law
altogether, or are tempted to attribute to the Law a capacity to save.

There are three ways in which the Law may be abused. First, by the self-
righteous hypocrites who fancy that they can be justified by the Law.
Secondly, by those who claim that Christian liberty exempts a Christian
from the observance of the Law. “These,” says Peter, “use their liberty for a
cloak of maliciousness,” and bring the name and the Gospel of Christ into
ill repute. Thirdly, the Law is abused by those who do not understand that
the Law is meant to drive us to Christ. When the Law is properly used its
value cannot be too highly appraised. It will take me to Christ every time.

  VERSE 24. Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto

This simile of the schoolmaster is striking. Schoolmasters are
indispensable. But show me a pupil who loves his schoolmaster. How
little love is lost upon them the Jews showed by their attitude toward
Moses. They would have been glad to stone Moses to death. (Ex. 17:4.) You
cannot expect anything else. How can a pupil love a teacher who frustrates
his desires? And if the pupil disobeys, the schoolmaster whips him, and
the pupil has to like it and even kiss the rod with which he was beaten. Do
you think the schoolboy feels good about it? As soon as the teacher turns
his back, the pupil breaks the rod and throws it into the fire. And if he were
stronger than the teacher he would not take the beatings, but beat up the
teacher. All the same, teachers are indispensable, otherwise the children
would grow up without discipline, instruction, and training.

But how long are the scolding and the whippings of the schoolmaster to
continue? Only for a time, until the boy has been trained to be a worthy
heir of his father. No father wants his son to be whipped all the time. The
discipline is to last until the boy has been trained to be his father’s worthy

The Law is such a schoolmaster. Not for always, but until we have been
brought to Christ. The Law is not just another schoolmaster. The Law is a
specialist to bring us to Christ. What would you think of a schoolmaster
who could only torment and beat a child? Yet of such schoolmasters there
were plenty in former times, regular bruisers. The Law is not that kind of a
schoolmaster. It is not to torment us always. With its lashings it is only too
anxious to drive us to Christ. The Law is like the good schoolmaster who
trains his children to find pleasure in doing things they formerly detested.

  VERSE 24. That we might be justified by faith.

The Law is not to teach us another Law. When a person feels the full force
of the Law he is likely to think: I have transgressed all the commandments
of God; I am guilty of eternal death. If God will spare me I will change and
live right from now on. This natural but entirely wrong reaction to the
Law has bred the many ceremonies and works devised to earn grace and
remission of sins.

The Law means to enlarge my sins, to make me small, so that I may be
justified by faith in Christ. Faith is neither law nor word; but confidence in
Christ “who is the end of the law.” How so is Christ the end of the Law?
Not in this way that He replaced the old Law with new laws. Nor is Christ
the end of the Law in a way that makes Him a hard judge who has to be
bribed by works as the papists teach. Christ is the end or finish of the Law
to all who believe in Him. The Law can no longer accuse or condemn them.

But what does the Law accomplish for those who have been justified by
Christ? Paul answers this question next.

  VERSE 25. But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a

The Apostle declares that we are free from the Law. Christ fulfilled the
Law for us. We may live in joy and safety under Christ. The trouble is, our
flesh will not let us believe in Christ with all our heart. The fault lies not
with Christ, but with us. Sin clings to us as long as we live and spoils our
happiness in Christ. Hence, we are only partly free from the Law. “With
the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.”
(Romans 7:25.)

As far as the conscience is concerned it may cheerfully ignore the Law. But
because sin continues to dwell in the flesh, the Law waits around to
molest our conscience. More and more, however, Christ increases our
faith and in the measure in which our faith is increased, sin, Law, and
flesh subside.

If anybody objects to the Gospel and the sacraments on the ground that
Christ has taken away our sins once and for always, you will know what to
answer. You will answer: Indeed, Christ has taken away my sins. But my
flesh, the world, and the devil interfere with my faith. The little light of
faith in my heart does not shine all over me at once. It is a gradual
diffusion. In the meanwhile I console myself with the thought that
eventually my flesh will be made perfect in the resurrection.

  VERSE 26. For we are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.

Paul as a true apostle of faith always has the word “faith” on the tip of his
tongue. By faith, says he, we are the children of God. The Law cannot beget
children of God. It cannot regenerate us. It can only remind us of the old
birth by which we were born into the kingdom of the devil. The best the
Law can do for us is to prepare us for a new birth through faith in Christ
Jesus. Faith in Christ regenerates us into the children of God. St. John bears
witness to this in his Gospel: “As many as received him, to them gave he
power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name.”
(John 1:12.) What tongue of man or angel can adequately extol the mercy
of God toward us miserable sinners in that He adopted us for His own
children and fellow-heirs with His Son by the simple means of faith in
Christ Jesus!

  VERSE 27. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have
  put on Christ.

To “put on Christ” may be understood in two ways, according to the Law
and according to the Gospel. According to the Law as in Romans 13:14,
“Put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ,” which means to follow the example of

To put on Christ according to the Gospel means to clothe oneself with the
righteousness, wisdom, power, life, and Spirit of Christ. By nature we are
clad in the garb of Adam. This garb Paul likes to call “the old man.” Before
we can become the children of God this old man must be put off, as Paul
says, Ephesians 4:29. The garment of Adam must come off like soiled
clothes. Of course, it is not as simple as changing one’s clothes. But God
makes it simple. He clothes us with the righteousness of Christ by means
of Baptism, as the Apostle says in this verse: “As many of you as have
been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.” With this change of
garments a new birth, a new life stirs in us. New affections toward God
spring up in the heart. New determinations affect our will. All this is to
put on Christ according to the Gospel. Needless to say, when we have put
on the robe of the righteousness of Christ we must not forget to put on
also the mantle of the imitation of Christ.

  VERSE 28. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor
  free, there is neither male nor female; for ye are all one in Christ
The list might be extended indefinitely: There is neither preacher nor
hearer, neither teacher nor scholar, neither master nor servant, etc. In the
matter of salvation, rank, learning, righteousness, influence count for

With this statement Paul deals a death blow to the Law. When a person
has put on Christ nothing else matters. Whether a person is a Jew, a
punctilious and circumcised observer of the Law of Moses, or whether a
person is a noble and wise Greek does not matter. Circumstances, personal
worth, character, achievements have no bearing upon justification. Before
God they count for nothing. What counts is that we put on Christ.

Whether a servant performs his duties well; whether those who are in
authority govern wisely; whether a man marries, provides for his family,
and is an honest citizen; whether a woman is chaste, obedient to her
husband, and a good mother: all these advantages do not qualify a person
for salvation. These virtues are commendable, of course; but they do not
count points for justification. All the best laws, ceremonies, religions, and
deeds of the world cannot take away sin guilt, cannot dispatch death,
cannot purchase life.

There is much disparity among men in the world, but there is no such
disparity before God. “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of
God.” (Romans 3:23.) Let the Jews, let the Greeks, let the whole world keep
silent in the presence of God. Those who are justified are justified by
Christ. Without faith in Christ the Jew with his laws, the monk with his
holy orders, the Greek with his wisdom, the servant with his obedience,
shall perish forever.

  VERSE 28. For ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

There is much imparity among men in the world. And it is a good thing.
If the woman would change places with the man, if the son would change
places with the father, the servant with the master, nothing but confusion
would result. In Christ, however, all are equal. We all have one and the
same Gospel, “one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all,” one
Christ and Savior of all. The Christ of Peter, Paul, and all the saints is our
Christ. Paul can always be depended on to add the conditional clause, “In
Christ Jesus.” If we lose sight of Christ, we lose out.

  VERSE 29. And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs
  according to the promise.

“If ye be Christ’s” means, if you believe in Christ. If you believe in Christ,
then are you the children of Abraham indeed. Through our faith in Christ
Abraham gains paternity over us and over the nations of the earth
according to the promise: “In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be
blessed.” Through faith we belong to Christ and Christ to us.

                                  CHAPTER 4

  VERSE 1. Now I say, That the heir, as long as he is a child, differeth
  nothing from a servant, though he be Lord of all;

  VERSE 2. But is under tutors and governors until the time appointed
  of the father.

THE Apostle had apparently finished his discourse on justification when this
illustration of the youthful heir occurred to him. He throws it in for good
measure. He knows that plain people are sooner impressed by an apt
illustration than by learned discussion.

“I want to give you another illustration from everyday life,” he writes to the
Galatians. “As long as an heir is under age he is treated very much like a
servant. He is not permitted to order his own affairs. He is kept under
constant surveillance. Such discipline is good for him, otherwise he would
waste his inheritance in no time. This discipline, however, is not to last
forever. It is to last only until ‘the time appointed of the father.’ “

  VERSE 3. Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage
  under the elements of the world.

As children of the Law we were treated like servants and prisoners. We were
oppressed and condemned by the Law. But the tyranny of the Law is not to
last forever. It is to last only until “the time appointed of the father,”
until Christ came and redeemed us.

  VERSE 3. Under the elements of the world.

By the elements of the world the Apostle does not understand the physical
elements, as some have thought. In calling the Law “the elements of the
world” Paul means to say that the Law is something material, mundane,
earthly. It may restrain evil, but it does not deliver from sin. The Law does
not justify; it does not bring a person to heaven. I do not obtain eternal life
because I do not kill, commit adultery, steal, etc. Such mere outward decency
does not constitute Christianity. The heathen observe the same restraints to
avoid punishment or to secure the advantages of a good reputation. In the last
analysis such restraint is simple hypocrisy. When the Law exercises its
higher function it accuses and condemns the conscience. All these effects of
the Law cannot be called divine or heavenly. These effects are elements of
the world.

In calling the Law the elements of the world Paul refers to the whole Law,
principally to the ceremonial law which dealt with external matters, as
meat, drink, dress, places, times, feasts, cleansings, sacrifices, etc. These
are mundane matters which cannot save the sinner. Ceremonial laws are like
the statutes of governments dealing with purely civil matters, as commerce,
inheritance, etc. As for the pope’s church laws forbidding marriage and
meats, Paul calls them elsewhere the doctrines of devils. You would not call
such laws elements of heaven.

The Law of Moses deals with mundane matters. It holds the mirror to the evil
which is in the world. By revealing the evil that is in us it creates a longing
in the heart for the better things of God. The Law forces us into the arms of
Christ, “who is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that
believeth.” (Romans 1:4.) Christ relieves the conscience of the Law. In so far
as the Law impels us to Christ it renders excellent service.

I do not mean to give the impression that the Law should be despised. Neither
does Paul intend to leave that impression. The Law ought to be honored. But
when it is a matter of justification before God, Paul had to speak
disparagingly of the Law, because the Law has nothing to do with
justification. If it thrusts its nose into the business of justification we
must talk harshly to the Law to keep it in its place. The conscience ought not
to be on speaking terms with the Law. The conscience ought to know only
Christ. To say this is easy, but in times of trial, when the conscience writhes
in the presence of God, it is not so easy to do. As such times we are to
believe in Christ as if there were no Law or sin anywhere, but only Christ. We
ought to say to the Law: “Mister Law, I do not get you. You stutter so much. I
don’t think that you have anything to say to me.”

When it is not a question of salvation or justification with us, we are to
think highly of the Law and call it “holy, just, and good.” (Romans 7:12) The
Law is of no comfort to a stricken conscience. Therefore it should not be
allowed to rule in our conscience, particularly in view of the fact that Christ
paid so great a price to deliver the conscience from the tyranny of the Law.
Let us understand that the Law and Christ are impossible bedfellows. The
Law must leave the bed of the conscience, which is so narrow that it cannot
hold two, as Isaiah says, chapter 28, verse 20.

Only Paul among the apostles calls the Law “the elements of the world, weak
and beggarly elements, the strength of sin, the letter that killeth,” etc. The
other apostles do not speak so slightingly of the Law. Those who want to be
first-class scholars in the school of Christ want to pick up the language of
Paul. Christ called him a chosen vessel and equipped with a facility of
expression far above that of the other apostles, that he as the chosen vessel
should establish the doctrine of justification in clear-cut words.

  VERSES 4, 5. But when the fullness of the time was come, God sent
  forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, to redeem them
  that were under the law.

“The fullness of the time” means when the time of the Law was fulfilled and
Christ was revealed. Note how Paul explains Christ. “Christ,” says he, “is the
Son of God and the son of a woman. He submitted Himself under the Law to
redeem us who were under the Law.” In these words the Apostle explains the
person and office of Christ. His person is divine and human. “God sent forth
His Son, made of a woman.” Christ therefore is true God and true man.
Christ’s office the Apostle describes in the words: “Made under the law, to
redeem them that were under the law.”

Paul calls the Virgin Mary a woman. This has been frequently deplored even by
some of the ancient fathers who felt that Paul should have written “virgin”
instead of woman. But Paul is now treating of faith and Christian
righteousness, of the person and office of Christ, not of the virginity of
Mary. The inestimable mercy of God is sufficiently set forth by the fact that
His Son was born of a woman. The more general term “woman” indicates that
Christ was born a true man. Paul does not say that Christ was born of man and
woman, but only of woman. That he has a virgin in mind is obvious.

This passage furthermore declares that Christ’s purpose in coming was the
abolition of the Law, not with the intention of laying down new laws, but “to
redeem them that were under the law.” Christ himself declared: “I judge no
man.” (John 8:15.) Again, “I came not to judge the world, but to save the
world.” (John 12:47.) In other words: “I came not to bring more laws, or to
judge men according to the existing Law. I have a higher and better office. I
came to judge and to condemn the Law, so that it may no more judge and
condemn the world.”

How did Christ manage to redeem us? “He was made under the law.” When Christ
came He found us all in prison. What did He do about it? Although He was the
Lord of the Law, He voluntarily placed Himself under the Law and permitted it
to exercise dominion over Him, indeed to accuse and to condemn Him. When the
Law takes us into judgment it has a perfect right to do so. “For we are by
nature the children of wrath, even as others.” (Eph. 2:3.) Christ, however,
“did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth.” (I Pet. 2:22.) Hence the
Law had no jurisdiction over Him. Yet the Law treated this innocent, just, and
blessed Lamb of God as cruelly as it treated us. It accused Him of blasphemy
and treason. It made Him guilty of the sins of the whole world. It overwhelmed
him with such anguish of soul that His sweat was as blood. The Law condemned
Him to the shameful death on the Cross.

It is truly amazing that the Law had the effrontery to turn upon its divine
Author, and that without a show of right. For its insolence the Law in turn
was arraigned before the judgment seat of God and condemned. Christ might
have overcome the Law by an exercise of His omnipotent authority over the
Law. Instead, He humbled Himself under the Law for and together with them
that were under the Law. He gave the Law license to accuse and condemn Him.
His present mastery over the Law was obtained by virtue of His Sonship and
His substitutionary victory.

Thus Christ banished the Law from the conscience. It dare no longer banish us
from God. For that matter,–the Law continues to reveal sin. It still raises
its voice in condemnation. But the conscience finds quick relief in the words
of the Apostle: “Christ has redeemed us from the law.” The conscience can
now hold its head high and say to the Law: “You are not so holy yourself. You
crucified the Son of God. That was an awful thing for you to do. You have lost
your influence forever.”

The words, “Christ was made under the law,” are worth all the attention we
can bestow on them. They declare that the Son of God did not only fulfill one
or two easy requirements of the Law, but that He endured all the tortures of
the Law. The Law brought all its fright to bear upon Christ until He
experienced anguish and terror such as nobody else ever experienced. His
bloody sweat. His need of angelic comfort, His tremulous prayer in the
garden, His lamentation on the Cross, “My God, my God, why hast thou
forsaken me?” bear eloquent witness to the sting of the Law. He suffered “to
redeem them that were under the law.”

The Roman conception of Christ as a mere lawgiver more stringent than
Moses, is quite contrary to Paul’s teaching. Christ, according to Paul, was not
an agent of the Law but a patient of the Law. He was not a law-giver, but a

True enough, Christ also taught and expounded the Law. But it was incidental.
It was a sideline with Him. He did not come into the world for the purpose of
teaching the Law, as little as it was the purpose of His coming to perform
miracles. Teaching the Law and performing miracles did not constitute His
unique mission to the world. The prophets also taught the Law and performed
miracles. In fact, according to the promise of Christ, the apostles performed
greater miracles than Christ Himself. (John 14:12.) The true purpose of
Christ’s coming was the abolition of the Law, of sin, and of death.

If we think of Christ as Paul here depicts Him, we shall never go wrong. We
shall never be in danger of misconstruing the meaning of the Law. We shall
understand that the Law does not justify. We shall understand why a
Christian observes laws: For the peace of the world, out of gratitude to God,
and for a good example that others may be attracted to the Gospel.

  VERSE 5. That we might receive the adoption of sons.

Paul still has for his text Genesis 22:18, “In thy seed shall all the nations
of the earth be blessed.” In the course of his Epistle he calls this promise
of the blessing righteousness, life, deliverance from the Law, the testament,
etc. Now he also calls the promise of blessing “the adoption of sons,” the
inheritance of everlasting life.

What ever induced God to adopt us for His children and heirs? What claim can
men who are subservient to sin, subject to the curse of the Law, and worthy
of everlasting death, have on God and eternal life? That God adopted us is due
to the merit of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who humbled Himself under the
Law and redeemed us law-ridden sinners.

  VERSE 6. And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his
  Son into your hearts.

In the early Church the Holy Spirit was sent forth in visible form. He
descended upon Christ in the form of a dove (Matt. 3:16), and in the likeness
of fire upon the apostles and other believers. (Acts 2:3.) This visible
outpouring of the Holy Spirit was necessary to the establishment of the early
Church, as were also the miracles that accompanied the gift of the Holy
Ghost. Paul explained the purpose of these miraculous gifts of the Spirit in
I Corinthians 14:22, “Tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to
them that believe not.” Once the Church had been established and properly
advertised by these miracles, the visible appearance of the Holy Ghost

Next, the Holy Ghost is sent forth into the hearts of the believers, as here
stated, “God sent the Spirit of his Son into your hearts.” This sending is
accomplished by the preaching of the Gospel through which the Holy Spirit
inspires us with fervor and light, with new judgment, new desires, and new
motives. This happy innovation is not a derivative of reason or personal
development, but solely the gift and operation of the Holy Ghost.

This renewal by the Holy Spirit may not be conspicuous to the world, but it is
patent to us by our better judgment, our improved speech, and our unashamed
confession of Christ. Formerly we did not confess Christ to be our only merit,
as we do now in the light of the Gospel. Why, then, should we feel bad if the
world looks upon us as ravagers of religion and insurgents against
constituted authority? We confess Christ and our conscience approves of it.
Then, too, we live in the fear of God. If we sin, we sin not on purpose, but
unwittingly, and we are sorry for it. Sin sticks in our flesh, and the flesh
gets us into sin even after we have been imbued by the Holy Ghost. Outwardly
there is no great difference between a Christian and any honest man. The
activities of a Christian are not sensational. He performs his duty according
to his vocation. He takes good care of his family, and is kind and helpful to
others. Such homely, everyday performances are not much admired. But the
setting-up exercises of the monks draw great applause. Holy works, you
know. Only the acts of a Christian are truly good and acceptable to God,
because they are done in faith, with a cheerful heart, out of gratitude to

We ought to have no misgivings about whether the Holy Ghost dwells in us.
We are “the temple of the Holy Ghost.” (I Cor. 3:16.) When we have a love for
the Word of God, and gladly hear, talk, write, and think of Christ, we are to
know that this inclination toward Christ is the gift and work of the Holy
Ghost. Where you come across contempt for the Word of God, there is the
devil. We meet with such contempt for the Word of God mostly among the
common people. They act as though the Word of God does not concern them.
Wherever you find a love for the Word, thank God for the Holy Spirit who
infuses this love into the hearts of men. We never come by this love
naturally, neither can it be enforced by laws. It is the gift of the Holy

The Roman theologians teach that no man can know for a certainty whether
he stands in the favor of God or not. This teaching forms one of the chief
articles of their faith. With this teaching they tormented men’s consciences,
excommunicated Christ from the Church, and limited the operations of the
Holy Ghost.

St. Augustine observed that “every man is certain of his faith, if he has
faith.” This the Romanists deny. “God forbid,” they exclaim piously, “that I
should ever be so arrogant as to think that I stand in grace, that I am holy,
or that I have the Holy Ghost.” We ought to feel sure that we stand in the
grace of God, not in view of our own worthiness, but through the good services
of Christ. As certain as we are that Christ pleases God, so sure ought we to
be that we also please God, because Christ is in us. And although we daily
offend God by our sins, yet as often as we sin, God’s mercy bends over us.
Therefore sin cannot get us to doubt the grace of God. Our certainty is of
Christ, that mighty Hero who overcame the Law, sin, death, and all evils. So
long as He sits at the right hand of God to intercede for us, we have nothing
to fear from the anger of God.

This inner assurance of the grace of God is accompanied by outward indications
such as gladly to hear, preach, praise, and to confess Christ, to do one’s
duty in the station in which God has placed us, to aid the needy, and to
comfort the sorrowing. These are the affidavits of the Holy Spirit testifying
to our favorable standing with God.

If we could be fully persuaded that we are in the good grace of God, that our
sins are forgiven, that we have the Spirit of Christ, that we are the beloved
children of God, we would be ever so happy and grateful to God. But because
we often feel fear and doubt we cannot come to that happy certainty.

Train your conscience to believe that God approves of you. Fight it out with
doubt. Gain assurance through the Word of God. Say: “I am all right with God. I
have the Holy Ghost. Christ, in whom I do believe, makes me worthy. I gladly
hear, read, sing, and write of Him. I would like nothing better than that
Christ’s Gospel be known throughout the world and that many, many be
brought to faith in Him.”

  VERSE 6. Crying, Abba, Father.

Paul might have written, “God sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your
hearts, calling Abba, Father.” Instead, he wrote, “Crying, Abba, Father.” In
the eighth chapter of the Epistle to the Romans the Apostle describes this
crying of the Spirit as “groanings which cannot be uttered.” He writes in the
26th verse: “Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not
what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession
for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.”

The fact that the Spirit of Christ in our hearts cries unto God and makes
intercession for us with groanings should reassure us greatly. However, there
are many factors that prevent such full reassurance on our part. We are born
in sin. To doubt the good will of God is an inborn suspicion of God with all
of us. Besides, the devil, our adversary, goeth about seeking to devour us by
roaring: “God is angry at you and is going to destroy you forever.” In all
these difficulties we have only one support, the Gospel of Christ. To hold on
to it, that is the trick. Christ cannot be perceived with the senses. We
cannot see Him. The heart does not feel His helpful presence. Especially in
times of trials a Christian feels the power of sin, the infirmity of his
flesh, the goading darts of the devil, the agues of death, the scowl and
judgment of God. All these things cry out against us. The Law scolds us, sin
screams at us, death thunders at us, the devil roars at us. In the midst of
the clamor the Spirit of Christ cries in our hearts: “Abba, Father.” And this
little cry of the Spirit transcends the hullabaloo of the Law, sin, death, and
the devil, and finds a hearing with God.

The Spirit cries in us because of our weakness. Because of our infirmity the
Holy Ghost is sent forth into our hearts to pray for us according to the will
of God and to assure us of the grace of God.

Let the Law, sin, and the devil cry out against us until their outcry fills
heaven and earth. The Spirit of God outcries them all. Our feeble groans,
“Abba, Father,” will be heard of God sooner than the combined racket of hell,
sin, and the Law.

We do not think of our groanings as a crying. It is so faint we do not know we
are groaning. “But he,” says Paul, “that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is
the mind of the Spirit.” (Romans 8:27.) To this Searcher of hearts our feeble
groaning, as it seems to us, is a loud shout for help in comparison with which
the howls of hell, the din of the devil, the yells of the Law, the shouts of
sin are like so many whispers.

In the fourteenth chapter of Exodus the Lord addresses Moses at the Red Sea:
“Wherefore criest thou unto me?” Moses had not cried unto the Lord. He
trembled so he could hardly talk. His faith was at low ebb. He saw the people
of Israel wedged between the Sea and the approaching armies of Pharaoh.
How were they to escape? Moses did not know what to say. How then could
God say that Moses was crying to Him? God heard the groaning heart of Moses
and the groans to Him sounded like loud shouts for help. God is quick to catch
the sigh of the heart.

Some have claimed that the saints are without infirmities. But Paul says:
“The Spirit helpeth our infirmities, and maketh intercession for us with
groanings which cannot be uttered.” We need the help of the Holy Spirit
because we are weak and infirm. And the Holy Spirit never disappoints us.
Confronted by the armies of Pharaoh, retreat cut off by the waters of the Red
Sea, Moses was in a bad spot. He felt himself to blame. The devil accused him:
“These people will all perish, for they cannot escape. And you are to blame
because you led the people out of Egypt. You started all this.” And then the
people started in on Moses. “Because there were no graves in Egypt, hast thou
taken us away to die in the wilderness? For it had been better for us to serve
the Egyptians, than that we should die in the wilderness.” (Ex. 14:11, 12.) But
the Holy Ghost was in Moses and made intercession for him with unutterable
groanings, sighings unto the Lord: “O Lord, at Thy commandment have I led
forth this people. So help me now.”

The Spirit intercedes for us not in many words or long prayers, but with
groanings, with little sounds like “Abba.” Small as this word is, it says ever
so much. It says: “My Father, I am in great trouble and you seem so far away.
But I know I am your child, because you are my Father for Christ’s sake. I am
loved by you because of the Beloved.” This one little word “Abba” surpasses
the eloquence of a Demosthenes and a Cicero.

I have spent much time on this verse in order to combat the cruel teaching of
the Roman church, that a person ought to be kept in a state of uncertainty
concerning his status with God. The monasteries recruit the youth on the plea
that their “holy” orders will assuredly recruit them for heaven. But once
inside the monastery the recruits are told to doubt the promises of God.

In support of their error the papists quote the saying of Solomon: “The
righteous, and the wise, and their works, are in the hand of God: no man
knoweth either love or hatred by all that is before them.” (Eccles. 9:1.) They
take this hatred to mean the wrath of God to come. Others take it to mean
God’s present anger. None of them seem to understand this passage from
Solomon. On every page the Scriptures urge us to believe that God is
merciful, loving, and patient; that He is faithful and true, and that He keeps
His promises. All the promises of God were fulfilled in the gift of His only-
begotten Son, that “whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have
everlasting life.” The Gospel is reassurance for sinners. Yet this one saying
from Solomon, misinterpreted at that, is made to count for more than all the
many promises of all the Scriptures.

If our opponents are so uncertain about their status with God, and even go so
far as to say that the conscience ought to be kept in a state of doubt, why is
it that they persecute us as vile heretics? When it comes to persecuting us
they do not seem to be in doubt and uncertainty one minute.

Let us not fail to thank God for delivering us from the doctrine of doubt. The
Gospel commands us to look away from our own good works to the promises
of God in Christ, the Mediator. The pope commands us to look away from the
promises of God in Christ to our own merit. No wonder they are the eternal
prey of doubt and despair. We depend upon God for salvation. No wonder that
our doctrine is certified, because it does not rest in our own strength, our
own conscience, our own feelings, our own person, our own works. It is built
on a better foundation. It is built on the promises and truth of God.

Besides, the passage from Solomon does not treat of the hatred and love of
God towards men. It merely rebukes the ingratitude of men. The more
deserving a person is, the less he is appreciated. Often those who should be
his best friends, are his worst enemies. Those who least deserve the praise
of the world, get most. David was a holy man and a good king. Nevertheless he
was chased from his own country. The prophets, Christ, the apostles, were
slain. Solomon in this passage does not speak of the love and hatred of God,
but of love and hatred among men. As though Solomon wanted to say: “There
are many good and wise men whom God uses for the advancement of mankind.
Seldom, if ever, are their efforts crowned with gratitude. They are usually
repaid with hatred and ingratitude.”

We are being treated that way. We thought we would find favor with men for
bringing them the Gospel of peace, life, and eternal salvation. Instead of
favor, we found fury. At first, yes, many were delighted with our doctrine
and received it gladly. We counted them as our friends and brethren, and were
happy to think that they would help us in sowing the seed of the Gospel. But
they revealed themselves as false brethren and deadly enemies of the Gospel.
If you experience the ingratitude of men, don’t let it get you down. Say with
Christ: “They hated me without cause.” And, “For my love they are my
adversaries; but I give myself unto prayer.” (Ps. 109:4.)

Let us never doubt the mercy of God in Christ Jesus, but make up our minds
that God is pleased with us, that He looks after us, and that we have the Holy
Spirit who prays for us.

  VERSE 7. Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son.

This sentence clinches Paul’s argument. He says: “With the Holy Spirit in our
hearts crying, ‘Abba, Father,’ there can be no doubt that God has adopted us
for His children and that our subjection to the Law has come to an end.” We
are now the free children of God. We may now say to the Law: “Mister Law,
you have lost your throne to Christ. I am free now and a son of God. You
cannot curse me any more.” Do not permit the Law to lie in your conscience.
Your conscience belongs to Christ. Let Christ be in it and not the Law.

As the children of God we are the heirs of His eternal heaven. What a
wonderful gift heaven is, man’s heart cannot conceive, much less describe.
Until we enter upon our heavenly inheritance we are only to have our little
faith to go by. To man’s reason our faith looks rather forlorn. But because our
faith rests on the promises of the infinite God, His promises are also
infinite, so much so that nothing can accuse or condemn us.

  VERSE 7. And if a son, then an heir of God through Christ.

A son is an heir, not by virtue of high accomplishments, but by virtue of his
birth. He is a mere recipient. His birth makes him an heir, not his labors. In
exactly the same way we obtain the eternal gifts of righteousness,
resurrection, and everlasting life. We obtain them not as agents, but as
beneficiaries. We are the children and heirs of God through faith in Christ. We
have Christ to thank for everything.

We are not the heirs of some rich and mighty man, but heirs of God, the
almighty Creator of all things. If a person could fully appreciate what it
means to be a son and heir of God, he would rate the might and wealth of
nations small change in comparison with his heavenly inheritance. What is
the world to him who has heaven? No wonder Paul greatly desired to depart
and to be with Christ. Nothing would be more welcome to us than early death,
knowing that it would spell the end of all our miseries and the beginning of
all our happiness. Yes, if a person could perfectly believe this he would not
long remain alive. The anticipation of his joy would kill him.

But the law of the members strives against the law of the mind, and makes
perfect joy and faith impossible. We need the continued help and comfort of
the Holy Spirit. We need His prayers. Paul himself cried out: “O wretched man
that I am! Who shall deliver me from the body of this death?” The body of this
death spoiled the joy of his spirit. He did not always entertain the sweet and
glad expectation of his heavenly inheritance. He often felt miserable.

This goes to show how hard it is to believe. Faith is feeble, because the flesh
wars against the spirit. If we could have perfect faith, our loathing for this
life in the world would be complete. We would not be so careful about this
life. We would not be so attached to the world and the things of the world. We
would not feel so good when we have them; we would not feel so bad when we
lose them. We would be far more humble and patient and kind. But our faith is
weak, because our spirit is weak. In this life we can have only the first-
fruits of the Spirit, as Paul says.

  VERSE 7. Through Christ.

The Apostle always has Christ on the tip of his tongue. He foresaw that
nothing would be less known in the world some day than the Gospel of Christ.
Therefore he talks of Christ continually. As often as he speaks of
righteousness, grace, the promise, the adoption, and the inheritance of
heaven, he adds the words, “In Christ,” or “Through Christ,” to show that
these blessings are not to be had by the Law, or the deeds of the Law, much
less by our own exertions, or by the observance of human traditions, but only
by and through and in Christ.

  VERSES 8 and 9. Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service
  unto them which by nature are no gods. But now, after that ye have
  known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak
  and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage?

This concludes Paul’s discourse on justification. From now to the end of the
Epistle the Apostle writes mostly of Christian conduct. But before he follows
up his doctrinal discourse with practical precepts he once more reproves the
Galatians. He is deeply displeased with them for relinquishing their divine
doctrine. He tells them: “You have taken on teachers who intend to recommit
you to the Law. By my doctrine I called you out of the darkness of ignorance
into the wonderful light of the knowledge of God. I led you out of bondage into
the freedom of the sons of God, not by the prescription of laws, but by the
gift of heavenly and eternal blessings through Christ Jesus. How could you so
soon forsake the light and return to darkness? How could you so quickly stray
from grace into the Law, from freedom into bondage?”

The example of the Galatians, of Anabaptists, and other sectarians in our day
bears testimony to the ease with which faith may be lost. We take great
pains in setting forth the doctrine of faith by preaching and by writing. We
are careful to apply the Gospel and the Law in their proper turn. Yet we make
little headway because the devil seduces people into misbelief by taking
Christ out of their sight and focusing their eyes upon the Law.

But why does Paul accuse the Galatians of reverting to the weak and beggarly
elements of the Law when they never had the Law? Why does he not say to
them: “At one time you Galatians did not know God. You then served idols that
were no gods. But now that you have come to know the true God, why do you
go back to the worship of idols?” Paul seems to identify their defection from
the Gospel to the Law with their former idolatry. Indeed he does. Whoever
gives up the article of justification does not know the true God. It is one and
the same thing whether a person reverts to the Law or to the worship of
idols. When the article of justification is lost, nothing remains except error,
hypocrisy, godlessness, and idolatry.

God will and can be known in no other way than in and through Christ
according to the statement of John 1:18, “The only begotten Son, which is in
the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.” Christ is the only means
whereby we can know God and His will. In Christ we perceive that God is not
a cruel judge, but a most loving and merciful Father who to bless and to save
us “spared not his own Son, but gave him up for us all.” This is truly to know

Those who do not know God in Christ arrive at this erroneous conclusion: “I
will serve God in such and such a way. I will join this or that order. I will
be active in this or that charitable endeavor. God will sanction my good
intentions and reward me with everlasting life. For is He not a merciful and
generous Father who gives good things even to the unworthy and ungrateful? How
much more will He grant unto me everlasting life as a due payment in return
for my many good deeds and merits.” This is the religion of reason. This is
the natural religion of the world. “The natural man receiveth not the things
of the Spirit of God. (I Cor. 2:14.) “There is none that understandeth, there
is none that seeketh after God.” (Romans 3:11.) Hence, there is really no
difference between a Jew, a Mohammedan, and any other old or new heretic.
There may be a difference of persons, places, rites, religions, ceremonies,
but as far as their fundamental beliefs are concerned they are all alike.

Is it therefore not extreme folly for Rome and the Mohammedans to fight
each other about religion? How about the monks? Why should one monk want
to be accounted more holy than another monk because of some silly ceremony,
when all the time their basic beliefs are asmuch alike as one egg is like the
other? They all imagine, if we do this or that work, God will have mercy on
us; if not, God will be angry.

God never promised to save anybody for his religious observance of
ceremonies and ordinances. Those who rely upon such things do serve a god,
but it is their own invention of a god, and not the true God. The true God has
this to say: No religion pleases Me whereby the Father is not glorified
through His Son Jesus. All who give their faith to this Son of Mine, to them I
am God and Father. I accept, justify, and save them. All others abide under My
curse because they worship creatures instead of Me.

Without the doctrine of justification there can be only ignorance of God.
Those who refuse to be justified by Christ are idolaters. They remain under
the Law, sin, death, and the power of the devil. Everything they do is wrong.

Nowadays there are many such idolaters who want to be counted among the
true confessors of the Gospel. They may even teach that men are delivered
from their sins by the death of Christ. But because they attach more
importance to charity than to faith in Christ they dishonor Him and pervert
His Word. They do not serve the true God, but an idol of their own invention.
The true God has never yet smiled upon a person for his charity or virtues,
but only for the sake of Christ’s merits.

The objection is frequently raised that the Bible commands that we should
love God with all our heart. True enough. But because God commands it, it
does not follow that we do it. If we could love God with all our heart we
should undoubtedly be justified by our obedience, for it is written, “Which if
a man do, he shall live in them.” (Lev. 18:5.) But now comes the Gospel and
says: “Because you do not do these things, you cannot live in them.” The
words, “Thou shalt love the Lord, thy God,” require perfect obedience, perfect
fear, perfect trust, and perfect love. But where are the people who can render
perfection? Hence, this commandment, instead of justifying men, only
accuses and condemns them. “Christ is the end of the law for righteousness
to every one that believeth” (Romans 10:1.)

How may these two contradictory statements of the Apostle, “Ye knew not
God,” and “Ye worshipped God,” be reconciled? I answer: By nature all men
know that there is a God, “because that which may be known of God is
manifest in them, for God hath showed it unto them. For the invisible things
of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen.” (Romans 1:19, 20.)
Furthermore, the different religions to be found among all nations at all
times bear witness to the fact that all men have a certain intuitive
knowledge of God.

If all men know God how can Paul say that the Galatians did not know God
prior to the hearing of the Gospel? I answer: There is a twofold knowledge of
God, general and particular. All men have the general and instinctive
recognition that there is a God who created heaven and earth, who is just and
holy, and who punishes the wicked. How God feels about us, what His
intentions are, what He will do for us, or how He will save us, that men
cannot know instinctively. It must be revealed to them. I may know a person
by sight, and still not know him, because I do not know how he feels about
me. Men know instinctively that there is a God. But what His will is toward
them, they do not know. It is written: “There is none that understandeth God.”
(Romans 3:11.) Again, “No man hath seen God.” (John 1:18.) Now, what good
does it do you if you know that there is a God, if you do not know how He
feels about you, or what He wants of you? People have done a good deal of
guessing. The Jew imagines he is doing the will of God if he concentrates on
the Law of Moses. The Mohammedan thinks his Koran is the will of God. The
monk fancies he is doing the will of God if he performs his vows. But they
deceive themselves and become “vain in their imaginations,” as Paul says,
Romans 1:21. Instead of worshipping the true God, they worship the vain
imaginations of their foolish hearts.

What Paul means by saying to the Galatians, “When ye knew not God,” is
simply this: “There was a time when you did not know the will of God in
Christ, but you worshipped gods of your own invention, thinking that you had
to perform this or that labor.”
Whether you understand the “elements of the world” to mean the Law of
Moses, or the religions of the heathen nations, it makes no difference. Those
who lapse from the Gospel to the Law are no better off than those who lapse
from grace into idolatry. Without Christ all religion is idolatry. Without
Christ men will entertain false ideas about God, call their ideas what you
like, the laws of Moses, the ordinances of the Pope, the Koran of the
Mohammedans, or what have you.

  VERSE 9. But now, after that ye have known God.

“Is it not amazing,” cries Paul, “that you Galatians who knew God intimately
by the hearing of the Gospel, should all of a sudden revert from the true
knowledge of His will in which I thought you were confirmed, to the weak and
beggarly elements of the Law which can only enslave you again?”

  VERSE 9. Or rather are known of God.

The Apostle turns the foregoing sentence around. He fears the Galatians have
lost God altogether. “Alas,” he cries, “have you come to this, that you no
longer know God? What else am I to think? Nevertheless, God knows you.” Our
knowledge of God is rather passive than active. God knows us better than we
know God. “Ye are known of God” means that God brings His Gospel to our
attention, and endows us with faith and the Holy Spirit. Even in these words
the Apostle denies the possibility of our knowing God by the performance of
the Law. “No man knoweth who the Father is, but the Son, and he to whom the
Son will reveal him.” (Luke 10:22.) “By his knowledge shall my righteous
servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities.” (Isaiah 53:11.)

The Apostle frankly expresses his surprise to the Galatians that they who
had known God intimately through the Gospel, should so easily be persuaded
by the false apostles to return to the weak and beggarly elements of the Law.
I would not be surprised to see my church perverted by some fanatic through
one or two sermons. We are no better than the apostles who had to witness
the subversion of the churches which they had planted with their own hands.
Nevertheless, Christ will reign to the end of the world, and that
miraculously, as He did during the Dark Ages.

Paul seems to think rather ill of the Law. He calls it the elements of the
world, the weak and beggarly elements of the world. Was it not irreverent for
him to speak that way about the holy Law of God? The Law ought to prepare
the way of Christ into the hearts of men. That is the true purpose and
function of the Law. But if the Law presumes to usurp the place and function
of the Gospel, it is no longer the holy Law of God, but a pseudo-Gospel.

If you care to amplify this matter you may add the observation that the Law
is a weak and beggarly element because it makes people weak and beggarly.
The Law has no power and affluence to make men strong and rich before God.
To seek to be justified by the Law amounts to the same thing as if a person
who is already weak and feeble should try to find strength in weakness, or as
if a person with the dropsy should seek a cure by exposing himself to the
pestilence, or as if a leper should go to a leper, and a beggar to a beggar to
find health and wealth.

Those who seek to be justified by the Law grow weaker and more destitute
right along. They are weak and bankrupt to begin with. They are by nature the
children of wrath. Yet for salvation they grasp at the straw of the Law. The
Law can only aggravate their weakness and poverty. The Law makes them ten
times weaker and poorer than they were before.

I and many others have experienced the truth of this. I have known monks who
zealously labored to please God for salvation, but the more they labored the
more impatient, miserable, uncertain, and fearful they became. What else can
you expect? You cannot grow strong through weakness and rich through
poverty. People who prefer the Law to the Gospel are like Aesop’s dog who let
go of the meat to snatch at the shadow of the water. There is no satisfaction
in the Law. What satisfaction can there be in collecting laws with which to
torment oneself and others? One law breeds ten more until their number is

Who would have thought it possible that the Galatians, taught as they were
by that efficient apostle and teacher, Paul, could so quickly be led astray by
the false apostles? To fall away from the Gospel is an easy matter because
few people appreciate what an excellent treasure the knowledge of Christ
really is. People are not sufficiently exercised in their faith by afflictions.
They do not wrestle against sin. They live in security without conflict.
Because they have never been tried in the furnace of affliction they are not
properly equipped with the armor of God and know not how to use the sword
of the Spirit. As long as they are being shepherded by faithful pastors, all is
well. But when their faithful shepherds are gone and wolves disguised as
sheep break into the fold, back they go to the weak and beggarly elements of
the Law.

Whoever goes back to the Law loses the knowledge of the truth, fails in the
recognition of his sinfulness, does not know God, nor the devil, nor himself,
and does not understand the meaning and purpose of the Law. Without the
knowledge of Christ a man will always argue that the Law is necessary for
salvation, that it will strengthen the weak and enrich the poor. Wherever this
opinion holds sway the promises of God are denied, Christ is demoted,
hypocrisy and idolatry are established.

  VERSE 9. Whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage.

The Apostle pointedly asks the Galatians whether they desire to be in
bondage again to the Law. The Law is weak and poor, the sinner is weak and
poor–two feeble beggars trying to help each other. They cannot do it. They
only wear each other out. But through Christ a weak and poor sinner is
revived and enriched unto eternal life.

  VERSE 10. Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years.

The Apostle Paul knew what the false apostles were teaching the Galatians:
The observance of days, and months, and times, and years. The Jews had
been obliged to keep holy the Sabbath Day, the new moons, the feast of the
passover, the feast of tabernacles, and other feasts. The false apostles
constrained the Galatians to observe these Jewish feasts under threat of
damnation. Paul hastens to tell the Galatians that they were exchanging
their Christian liberty for the weak and beggarly elements of the world.

  VERSE 11. I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labor in

It grieves the Apostle to think that he might have preached the Gospel to
the Galatians in vain. But this statement expresses more than grief. Behind
his apparent disappointment at their failure lurks the sharp reprimand
that they had forsaken Christ and that they were proving themselves to be
obstinate unbelievers. But he does not openly condemn them for fear that
oversharp criticism might alienate them altogether. He therefore changes
the tone of his voice and speaks kindly to them.

  VERSE 12. Be as I am; for I am as ye are.

Up to this point Paul has been occupied with the doctrinal aspect of the
apostasy of the Galatians. He did not conceal his disappointment at their
lack of stability. He had rebuked them. He had called them fools, crucifiers
of Christ, etc. Now that the more important part of his Epistle has been
finished, he realizes that he has handled the Galatians too roughly.
Anxious lest he should do more harm than good, he is careful to let them
see that his criticism proceeds from affection and a true apostolic concern
for their welfare. He is eager to mitigate his sharp words with gentle
sentiments in order to win them again.

Like Paul, all pastors and ministers ought to have much sympathy for their
poor straying sheep, and instruct them in the spirit of meekness. They
cannot be straightened out in any other way. Oversharp criticism provokes
anger and despair, but no repentance. And here let us note, by the way, that
true doctrine always produces concord. When men embrace errors, the tie
of Christian love is broken.

At the beginning of the Reformation we were honored as the true ministers
of Christ. Suddenly certain false brethren began to hate us. We had given
them no offense, no occasion to hate us. They knew then as they know
now that ours is the singular desire to publish the Gospel of Christ
everywhere. What changed their attitude toward us? False doctrine.
Seduced into error by the false apostles, the Galatians refused to
acknowledge St. Paul as their pastor. The name and doctrine of Paul
became obnoxious to them. I fear this Epistle recalled very few from their

Paul knew that the false apostles would misconstrue his censure of the
Galatians to their own advantage and say: “So this is your Paul whom you
praise so much. What sweet names he is calling you in his letter. When he
was with you he acted like a father, but now he acts like a dictator.” Paul
knew what to expect of the false apostles and therefore he is worried. He
does not know what to say. It is hard for a man to defend his cause at a
distance, especially when he has reason to think that he personally has
fallen into disfavor.

  VERSE 12. Be as I am; for I am as ye are.

In beseeching the Galatians to be as he is, Paul expresses the hope that they
might hold the same affection for him that he holds for them. “Perhaps I
have been a little hard with you. Forgive it. Do not judge my heart
according to my words.”

We request the same consideration for ourselves. Our way of writing is
incisive and straightforward. But there is no bitterness in our heart. We
seek the honor of Christ and the welfare of men. We do not hate the Pope
as to wish him ill. We do not desire the death of our false brethren. We
desire that they may turn from their evil ways to Christ and be saved with
us. A teacher chastises the pupil to reform him. The rod hurts, but
correction is necessary. A father punishes his son because he loves his son.
If he did not love the lad he would not punish him but let him have his
own way in everything until he comes to harm. Paul beseeches the
Galatians to look upon his correction as a sign that he really cared for them.
“Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous;
nevertheless, afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto
them which are exercised thereby.” (Heb. 12:11.)

Although Paul seeks to soften the effect of his reproachful words, he does
not take them back. When a physician administers a bitter potion to a
patient, he does it to cure the patient. The fact that the medicine is bitter
is no fault of the physician. The malady calls for a bitter medicine. Paul
wants the Galatians to judge his words according to the situation that made
them necessary.

  VERSE 12. Brethren, I beseech you. . .Ye have not injured me at all.

Would you call it beseeching the Galatians to call them “bewitched,”
“disobedient,” “crucifiers of Christ”? The Apostle calls it an earnest
beseeching. And so it is. When a father corrects his son it means as if he
were saying, “My son, I beseech you, be a good boy.”

  VERSE 12. Ye have not injured me at all.

“I am not angry with you,” says Paul. “Why should I be angry with you,
since you have done me no injury at all?”

To this the Galatians reply: “Why, then, do you say that we are perverted,
that we have forsaken the true doctrine, that we are foolish, bewitched, etc.,
if you are not angry? We must have offended you somehow.”

Paul answers: “You Galatians have not injured me. You have injured
yourselves. I chide you not because I wish you ill. I have no reason to wish
you ill. God is my witness, you have done me no wrong. On the contrary,
you have been very good to me. The reason I write to you is because I love

The bitter potion must be sweetened with honey and sugar to make it
palatable. When parents have punished their children they give them
apples, pears, and other good things to show them that they mean well.

  VERSES 13, 14. Ye know how through infirmity of the flesh I preached the
gospel unto you at the first. And my temptation which was in my flesh ye
despised not, nor rejected; but received me as an angel of God, even as
Christ Jesus.

“You Galatians were very good to me. When I began to preach the Gospel
to you in the infirmity of my flesh and in great temptation you were not at
all offended. On the contrary, you were so loving, so kind, so friendly
towards me, you received me like an angel, like Jesus Himself.”

Indeed, the Galatians are to be commended for receiving the Gospel from a
man as unimposing and afflicted all around as Paul was. Wherever he
preached the Gospel, Jews and Gentiles raved against him. All the
influential and religious people of his day denounced him. But the
Galatians did not mind it. That was greatly to their honor. And Paul does
not neglect to praise them for it. This praise Paul bestows on none of the
other churches to which he wrote.

St. Jerome and others of the ancient fathers allege this infirmity of Paul’s to
have been some physical defect, or concupiscence. Jerome and the other
diagnosticians lived at a time when the Church enjoyed peace and
prosperity, when the bishops increased in wealth and standing, when
pastors and bishops no longer sat over the Word of God. No wonder they
failed to understand Paul.

When Paul speaks of the infirmity of his flesh he does not mean some
physical defect or carnal lust, but the sufferings and afflictions which he
endured in his body. What these infirmities were he himself explains in
II Corinthians 12:9, 10: “Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my
infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. Therefore I take
pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in
distresses for Christ’s sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong.” And in
the eleventh chapter of the same Epistle the Apostle writes: “In labors
more abundant, in stripes above measure, in prisons more frequent, in
deaths oft. Of the Jews five times received I forty stripes save one. Thrice
was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned, thrice I suffered shipwreck,” etc.
(II Cor. 11:23-25.) By the infirmity of his flesh Paul meant these afflictions
and not some chronic disease. He reminds the Galatians how he was
always in peril at the hands of the Jews, Gentiles, and false brethren, how
he suffered hunger and want.

Now, the afflictions of the believers always offend people. Paul knew it and
therefore has high praise for the Galatians because they over looked his
afflictions and received him like an angel. Christ forewarned the faithful
against the offense of the Cross, saying: “Blessed is he, whosoever shall not
be offended in me.” (Matt. 11:6.) Surely it is no easy thing to confess Him
Lord of all and Savior of the world who was a reproach of men, and
despised of the people, and the laughing stock of the world. (Ps. 22:7.) I say,
to value this poor Christ, so spitefully scorned, spit upon, scourged, and
crucified, more than the riches of the richest, the strength of the strongest,
the wisdom of the wisest, is something. It is worth being called blessed.

Paul not only had outward afflictions but also inner, spiritual afflictions.
He refers to these in II Corinthians 7:6, “Without were fightings, within
were fears.” In his letter to the Philippians Paul makes mention of the
restoration of Epaphroditus as a special act of mercy on the part of God,
“lest I should have sorrow upon sorrow.”

Considering the many afflictions of Paul, we are not surprised to hear him
loudly praising the Galatians for not being offended at him as others were.
The world thinks us mad because we go about to comfort, to help, to save
others while we ourselves are in distress. People tell us: “Physician, heal
thyself.” (Luke 4:23.)

The Apostle tells the Galatians that he will keep their kindness in
perpetual remembrance. Indirectly, he also reminds them how much they
had loved him before the invasion of the false apostles, and gives them a
hint that they should return to their first love for him.

  VERSE 15. Where is then the blessedness ye spake of?

“How much happier you used to be. And how you Galatians used to tell
me that you were blessed. And how much did I not praise and commend
you formerly.” Paul reminds them of former and better times in an effort
to mitigate his sharp reproaches, lest the false apostles should slander him
and misconstrue his letter to his disadvantage and to their own advantage.
Such snakes in the grass are equal to anything. They will pervert words
spoken from a sincere heart and twist them to mean just the opposite of
what they were intended to convey. They are like spiders that suck venom
out of sweet and fragrant flowers. The poison is not in the flowers, but it is
the nature of the spider to turn what is good and wholesome into poison.

  VERSE 15. For I bear you record, that, if it had been possible, ye
  would have plucked out your own eyes, and have given them to me.

The Apostle continues his praise of the Galatians. “You did not only treat
me very courteously. If it had been necessary you would have plucked out
your eyes and sacrificed your lives for me.” And in very fact the Galatians
sacrificed their lives for Paul. By receiving and maintaining Paul they
called upon their own heads the hatred and malice of all the Jews and

Nowadays the name of Luther carries the same stigma. Whoever praises
Luther is a worse sinner than an idolater, perjurer, or thief.

  VERSE 16. Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the

Paul’s reason for praising the Galatians is to avoid giving them the
impression as if he were their enemy because he had reprimanded them.

A true friend will admonish his erring brother, and if the erring brother
has any sense at all he will thank his friend. In the world truth produces
hatred. Whoever speaks the truth is counted an enemy. But among friends
it is not so, much less among Christians. The Apostle wants his Galatians
to know that just because he had told them the truth they are not to think
that he dislikes them. “I told you the truth because I love you.”

  VERSE 17. They zealously affect you, but not well.

Paul takes the false apostles to task for their flattery. Satan’s satellites
softsoap the people. Paul calls it “by good words and fair speeches to
deceive the hearts of the simple.” (Romans 16:18.)

They tell me that by my stubbornness in this doctrine of the Sacrament I
am destroying the harmony of the church. They say it would be better if we
would make some slight concession rather than cause such commotion
and controversy in the Church regarding an article which is not even one
of the fundamental doctrines. My reply is, cursed be any love or harmony
which demands for its preservation that we place the Word of God in

  VERSE 17. Yea, they would exclude you, that ye might affect them.

“Do you Galatians know why the false apostles are so zealous about you?
They expect you to reciprocate. And that would leave me out. If their zeal
were right they would not mind your loving me. But they hate my
doctrine and want to stamp it out. In order to bring this to pass they go
about to alienate your hearts from me and to make me obnoxious to you.”
In this way Paul brings the false apostles into suspicion. He questions their
motives. He maintains that their zeal is mere pretense to deceive the
Galatians. Our Savior Christ also warned us, saying: “Beware of false
prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing.” (Matt. 7:15.)

Paul was considerably disturbed by the commissions and changes that
followed in the wake of his preaching. He was accused of being “a pestilent
fellow, a mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world.”
(Acts 24:5.) In Philippi the townspeople cried that he troubled their city and
taught customs which were not lawful for them to receive. (Acts 16:20, 21.)

All troubles, calamities, famines, wars were laid to the charge of the Gospel
of the apostles. However, the apostles were not deterred by such calumnies
from preaching the Gospel. They knew that they “ought to obey God rather
than men,” and that it was better for the world to be upset than to be
ignorant of Christ.

Do you think for a moment that these reactions did not worry the apostles?
They were not made of iron. They foresaw the revolutionary character of
the Gospel. They also foresaw the dissensions that would creep into the
Church. It was bad news for Paul when he heard that the Corinthians were
denying the resurrection of the dead, that the churches he had planted
were experiencing all kinds of difficulties, and that the Gospel was being
supplanted by false doctrines.

But Paul also knew that the Gospel was not to blame. He did not resign his
office because he knew that the Gospel he preached was the power of God
unto salvation to every one that believes.

The same criticism which was leveled at the apostles is leveled at us. The
doctrine of the Gospel, we are told, is the cause of all the present unrest in
the world. There is no wrong that is not laid to our charge. But why? We
do not spread wicked lies. We preach the glad tidings of Christ. Our
opponents will bear us out when we say that we never fail to urge respect
for the constituted authorities, because that is the will of God.

All of these vilifications cannot discourage us. We know that there is
nothing the devil hates worse than the Gospel. It is one of his little tricks
to blame the Gospel for every evil in the world. Formerly, when the
traditions of the fathers were taught in the Church, the devil was not
excited as he is now. It goes to show that our doctrine is of God, else
“behemoth would lie under shady trees, in the covert of the reed, and
fens.” The fact that he is again walking about as a roaring lion to stir up
riots and disorders is a sure sign that he has begun to feel the effect of our

  VERSE 18. But it is good to be zealously affected always in a good
  thing, and not only when I am present with you.

“When I was present with you, you loved me, although I preached the
Gospel to you in the infirmity of my flesh. The fact that I am now absent
from you ought not to change your attitude towards me. Although I am
absent in the flesh, I am with you in spirit and in my doctrine which you
ought to retain by all means because through it you received the Holy

  VERSE 19. My little children, of whom I travail in birth again until
  Christ be formed in you.

With every single word the Apostle seeks to regain the confidence of the
Galatians. He now calls them lovingly his little children. He adds the
simile: “Of whom I travail in birth again.” As parents reproduce their
physical characteristics in their children, so the apostles reproduced their
faith in the hearts of the hearers, until Christ was formed in them. A
person has the form of Christ when he believes in Christ to the exclusion
of everything else. This faith in Christ is engendered by the Gospel as the
Apostle declares in I Corinthians 4:15: “In Christ Jesus I have begotten you
through the Gospel”; and in II Corinthians 3:3, “Ye are the epistle of Christ
ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living
God.” The Word of God falling from the lips of the apostle or minister
enters into the heart of the hearer. The Holy Ghost impregnates the Word
so that it brings forth the fruit of faith. In this manner every Christian
pastor is a spiritual father who forms Christ in the hearts of his hearers.

At the same time Paul indicts the false apostles. He says: “I have begotten
you Galatians through the Gospel, giving you the form of Christ. But these
false apostles are giving you a new form, the form of Moses.” Note the
Apostle does not say, “Of whom I travail in birth again until I be formed in
you,” but “until Christ be formed in you.” The false apostles had torn the
form of Christ out of the hearts of the Galatians and substituted their own
form. Paul endeavors to reform them, or rather reform Christ in them.

  VERSE 20. I desire to be present with you now, and to change my voice.

A common saying has it that a letter is a dead messenger. Something is
lacking in all writing. You can never be sure how the written page will
affect the reader, because his mood, his circumstances, his affections are so
changeable. It is different with the spoken word. If it is harsh and ill-timed
it can always be remodeled. No wonder the Apostle expresses the wish that
he could speak to the Galatians in person. He could change his voice
according to their attitude. If he saw that they were repentant he could
soften the tone of his voice. If he saw that they were stubborn he could
speak to them more earnestly. This way he did not know how to deal with
them by letter. If his Epistle is too severe it will do more damage than good.
If it is too gentle, it will not correct conditions. But if he could be with
them in person he could change his voice as the occasion demanded.

  VERSE 20. For I stand in doubt of you.

“I do not know how to take you. I do not know how to approach you by
letter.” In order to make sure that he leaves no stone unturned in his effort
to recall them to the Gospel of Christ, he chides, entreats, praises, and
blames the Galatians, trying every way to hit the right note and tone of

  VERSE 21. Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear
  the law?

Here Paul would have closed his Epistle because he did not know what else
to say. He wishes he could see the Galatians in person and straighten out
their difficulties. But he is not sure whether the Galatians have fully
understood the difference between the Gospel and the Law. To make sure,
he introduces another illustration. He knows people like illustrations and
stories. He knows that Christ Himself made ample use of parables.

Paul is an expert at allegories. They are dangerous things. Unless a person
has a thorough knowledge of Christian doctrine he had better leave
allegories alone.

The allegory which Paul is about to bring is taken from the Book of Genesis
which he calls the Law. True, that book contains no mention of the Law.
Paul simply follows the custom of the Jews who included the first book of
Moses in the collective term, “Law.” Jesus even included the Psalms.

  VERSES 22, 23. For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one
  by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. But he who was of the
  bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was
  by promise.

This is Paul’s allegory. Abraham had two sons: Ishmael by Hagar, and Isaac
by Sarah. They were both the true sons of Abraham, with this difference,
that Ishmael was born after the flesh, i.e., without the commandment and
promise of God, while Isaac was born according to the promise.

With the permission of Sarah, Abraham took Hagar, Sarah’s bondwoman,
to wife. Sarah knew that God had promised to make her husband Abraham
the father of a nation, and she hoped that she would be the mother of this
promised nation. But with the passage of the years her hope died out. In
order that the promise of God should not be annulled by her barrenness
this holy woman resigned her right and honor to her maid. This was no
easy thing for her to do. She abased herself. She thought: “God is no liar.
What He has promised He will perform. But perhaps God does not want
me to be the mother of Abraham’s posterity. Perhaps He prefers Hagar for
the honor.”

Ishmael was thus born without a special word or promise of God, at the
mere request of Sarah. God did not command Abraham to take Hagar, nor
did God promise to bless the coalition. It is evident that Ishmael was the
son of Abraham after the flesh, and not after the promise.

In the ninth chapter of the Epistle to the Romans St. Paul advances the
same argument which he amplifies into an allegory in writing to the
Galatians. There he argues that all the children of Abraham are not the
children of God. For Abraham had two kinds of children, children born of
the promise, like Isaac, and other children born without the promise, as
Ishmael. With this argument Paul squelched the proud Jews who gloried
that they were the children of God because they were the seed and the
children of Abraham. Paul makes it clear enough that it takes more than
an Abrahamic pedigree to be a child of God. To be a child of God requires
faith in Christ.

  VERSE 24. Which things are an allegory.

Allegories are not very convincing, but like pictures they visualize a
matter. If Paul had not brought in advance indisputable arguments for the
righteousness of faith over against the righteousness of works this allegory
would do little good. Having first fortified his case with invincible
arguments, he can afford to inject this allegory to add impressiveness and
beauty to his presentation.

  VERSES 24, 25. For these are the two covenants; the one from the mount
  Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar. For this Agar is mount
  Sinai in Arabia.

In this allegory Abraham represents God. Abraham had two sons, born
respectively of Hagar and Sarah. The two women represent the two
Testaments. The Old Testament is Mount Sinai, the bondwoman, Hagar.
The Arabians call Mount Sinai Agar. It may be that the similarity of these
two names gave Paul his idea for this allegory. As Hagar bore Abraham a
son who was not an heir but a servant, so Sinai, the Law, the allegorical
Hagar, bore God a carnal and servile people of the Law without promise.
The Law has a promise but it is a conditional promise, depending upon
whether people fulfill the Law.

The Jews regarded the conditional promises of the Law as if they were
unconditional. When the prophets foretold the destruction of Jerusalem,
the Jews stoned them as blasphemers of God. They never gave it any
thought that there was a condition attached to the Law which reads: “If you
keep the commandments it shall be well with thee.”

  VERSE 25. And answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage
  with her children.

A little while ago Paul called Mount Sinai, Hagar. He would now gladly
make Jerusalem the Sarah of the New Testament, but he cannot. The
earthly Jerusalem is not Sarah, but a part of Hagar. Hagar lives there in the
home of the Law, the Temple, the priesthood, the ceremonies, and
whatever else was ordained in the Law at Mount Sinai.

I would have been tempted to call Jerusalem, Sarah, or the New
Testament. I would have been pleased with this turn of the allegory. It goes
to show that not everybody has the gift of allegory. Would you not think it
perfectly proper to call Sinai Hagar and Jerusalem Sarah? True, Paul does
call Sarah Jerusalem. But he has the spiritual and heavenly Jerusalem in
mind, not the earthly Jerusalem. Sarah represents that spiritual Jerusalem
where there is no Law but only the promise, and where the inhabitants are

To show that the Law has been quite abolished, the earthly Jerusalem was
completely destroyed with all her ornaments, temples, and ceremonies.

  VERSE 26. But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of
  us all.

The earthly Jerusalem with its ordinances and laws represents Hagar and
her offspring. They are slaves to the Law, sin and death. But the heavenly
Jerusalem is Sarah, the free woman. This heavenly Jerusalem is the
Church, that is to say the number of all believers throughout the world,
having one and the same Gospel, one and the same faith in Christ, one and
the same Holy Ghost, and the same sacraments.

Do not mistake this one word “above” to refer to the triumphant Church
in heaven, but to the militant Church on earth. In Philippians 3:20, the
Apostle uses the phrase: “Our conversation is in heaven,” not locally in
heaven, but in spirit. When a believer accepts the heavenly gifts of the
Gospel he is in heaven. So also in Ephesians 1:3, “Who hath blessed us
with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ.” Jerusalem here
means the universal Christian Church on earth.

Sarah, the Church, as the bride of Christ bears free children who are not
subject to the Law.

  VERSE 27. For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not;
  break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath
  many more children than she which hath an husband.

Paul quotes the allegorical prophecy of Isaiah to the effect that the mother
of many children must die desolately, while the barren woman shall have
an abundance of children. (Isaiah 54:1.) He applies this prophecy to Hagar
and Sarah, to the Law and the Gospel. The Law as the husband of the
fruitful woman procreates many children. For men of all ages have had the
idea that they are right when they follow after the Law and outwardly
perform its requirements.

Although the Law has many children, they are not free. They are slaves. As
servants they cannot have a share in the inheritance, but are driven from
the house as Ishmael was cast out of the house of Abraham. In fact the
servants of the Law are even now barred from the kingdom of light and
liberty, for “he that believeth not, is condemned already.” (John 3:18.) As
the servants of the Law they remain under the curse of the Law, under sin
and death, under the power of the devil, and under the wrath and
judgment of God.

On the other hand, Sarah, the free Church, seems barren. The Gospel of the
Cross which the Church proclaims does not have the appeal that the Law
has for men, and therefore it does not find many adherents. The Church
does not look prosperous. Unbelievers have always predicted the death of
the Church. The Jews were quite certain that the Church would not long
endure. They said to Paul: “As concerning this sect, we know that
everywhere it is spoken against.” (Acts 28:22.) No matter how barren and
forsaken, how weak and desolate the Church may seem, she alone is really
fruitful before God. By the Gospel she procreates an infinite number of
children that are free heirs of everlasting life.

The Law, “the old husband,” is really dead. But not all people know it, or
want to know it. They labor and bear the burden and the heat of the day,
and bring forth many children, children that are bastards like themselves,
children born to be put out of the house like Ishmael to perish forever.
Accursed be that doctrine, life, and religion which endeavors to obtain
righteousness before God by the Law and its creeds.

The scholastics think that the judicial and ceremonial laws of Moses were
abolished by the coming of Christ, but not the moral law. They are blind.
When Paul declares that we are delivered from the curse of the Law he
means the whole Law, particularly the moral law which more than the
other laws accuses, curses, and condemns the conscience. The Ten
Commandments have no right to condemn that conscience in which Jesus
dwells, for Jesus has taken from the Ten Commandments the right and
power to curse us.

Not as if the conscience is now insensitive to the terrors of the Law, but the
Law cannot drive the conscience to despair. “There is now no
condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus.” (Romans 8:1.) “If the
Son shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.” (John 8:36.)

You will complain: “But I am not doing anything.” That is right. You cannot
do a thing to be delivered from the tyranny of the Law. But listen to the
glad tidings which the Holy Ghost brings to you in the words of the
prophet: “Rejoice, thou barren.” As Christ is greater than the Law, so much
more excellent is the righteousness of Christ than the righteousness of the

In one more respect the Law has been abolished. The civil laws of Moses do
not concern us, and should not be put back in force. That does not mean
that we are exempt from obedience to the civil laws under which we live.
On the contrary, the Gospel commands Christians to obey government
“not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.” (Romans 13:5.)

Neither do the ordinances of Moses or those of the Pope concern us. But
because life cannot go on without some ordinances, the Gospel permits
regulations to be made in the Church in regard to special days, times,
places, etc., in order that the people may know upon what day, at what
hour, and in what place to assemble for the Word of God. Such directions
are desirable that “all things be done decently and in order.” (I Cor. 14:40.)
These directions may be changed or omitted altogether, as long as no
offense is given to the weak.

Paul, however, refers particularly to the abolition of the moral law. If faith
alone in Christ justifies, then the whole Law is abolished without
exception. And this the Apostle proves by the testimony of Isaiah, who bids
the barren to rejoice because she will have many children, whereas she that
has a husband and many children will be forsaken.

Isaiah calls the Church barren because her children are born without effort
by the Word of faith through the Spirit of God. It is a matter of birth, not of
exertion. The believer too works, but not in an effort to become a son and
an heir of God. He is that before he goes to work. He is born a son and an
heir. He works for the glory of God and the welfare of his fellowmen.

  VERSE 28. Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.

The Jews claimed to be the children of God because they were the children
of Abraham. Jesus answered them, John 8:39, 40, “If ye were Abraham’s
children, ye would do the works of Abraham. But now ye seek to kill me, a
man that hath told you the truth.” And in verse 42: “If God were your
Father, ye would love me.” In other words: “You are not the children of
God. If you were, you would know and love me. Brothers born and living
together in the same house recognize each other. You do not recognize me.
You are of your father, the devil.”

We are not like these Jews, the children of the bondwoman, the Law, who
were cast out of the house by Jesus. We are children of the promise like
Isaac, born of grace and faith unto an everlasting inheritance.

  VERSE 29. But as that he that was born after the flesh persecuted him
  that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.

This is a cheering thought. We who are born of the Gospel, and live in
Christ, and rejoice in our inheritance, have Ishmael for our enemy. The
children of the Law will always persecute the children of the Gospel. This is
our daily experience. Our opponents tell us that everything was at peace
before the Gospel was revived by us. Since then the whole world has been
upset. People blame us and the Gospel for everything, for the disobedience
of subjects to their rulers, for wars, plagues, and famines, for revolutions,
and every other evil that can be imagined. No wonder our opponents
think they are doing God a favor by hating and persecuting us. Ishmael will
persecute Isaac.

We invite our opponents to tell us what good things attended the
preaching of the Gospel by the apostles. Did not the destruction of
Jerusalem follow on the heels of the Gospel? And how about the
overthrow of the Roman Empire? Did not the whole world seethe with
unrest as the Gospel was preached in the whole world? We do not say that
the Gospel instigated these upheavals. The iniquity of man did it.

Our opponents blame our doctrine for the present turmoil. But ours is a
doctrine of grace and peace. It does not stir up trouble. Trouble starts when
the people, the nations and their rulers of the earth rage and take counsel
together against the Lord, and against His anointed. (Psalm 2.) But all their
counsels shall be brought to naught. “He that sitteth in the heavens shall
laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision.” (Psalm 2:4.) Let them cry out
against us as much as they like. We know that they are the cause of all their
own troubles.

As long as we preach Christ and confess Him to be our Savior, we must be
content to be called vicious trouble makers. “These that have turned the
world upside down are come hither also; and these all do contrary to the
decrees of Caesar,” so said the Jews of Paul and Silas. (Acts 17:6, 7.) Of Paul
they said: “We have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of
sedition among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the
sect of the Nazarenes.” The Gentiles uttered similar complaints: “These
men do exceedingly trouble our city.”

This man Luther is also accused of being a pestilent fellow who troubles
the papacy and the Roman empire. If I would keep silent, all would be well,
and the Pope would no more persecute me. The moment I open my mouth
the Pope begins to fume and to rage. It seems we must choose between
Christ and the Pope. Let the Pope perish.

Christ foresaw the reaction of the world to the Gospel. He said: “I am come
to send fire on the earth, and what will I, if it be already kindled?”
(Luke 12:49.)

Do not take the statement of our opponents seriously, that no good can
come of the preaching of the Gospel. What do they know? They would not
recognize the fruits of the Gospel if they saw them.

At any rate, our opponents cannot accuse us of adultery, murder, theft, and
such crimes. The worst they can say about us is that we have the Gospel.
What is wrong with the Gospel? We teach that Christ, the Son of God, has
redeemed us from sin and everlasting death. This is not our doctrine. It
belongs to Christ. If there is anything wrong with it, it is not our fault. If
they want to condemn Christ for being our Savior and Redeemer, that is
their lookout. We are mere onlookers, watching to see who will win the
victory, Christ or His opponents.

On one occasion Jesus remarked: “If ye were of the world, the world would
love his own, but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you
out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.” (John 15:19.) In
otherwords: “I am the cause of all your troubles. I am the one for whose
sake you are killed. If you did not confess my name, the world would not
hate you. The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted
me, they will also persecute you.”

Christ takes all the blame. He says: “You have not incurred the hatred and
persecutions of the world. I have. But be of good cheer; I have overcome
the world.”

  VERSE 30. Nevertheless what saith the Scripture? Cast out the
  bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir
  with the son of the free woman.

Sarah’s demand that the bondwoman and her son be cast out of the house
was undoubtedly a blow to Abraham. He felt sorry for his son Ishmael. The
Scripture explicitly states Abraham’s grief in the words: “And the thing was
very grievous in Abraham’s sight, because of his son.” (Gen. 21:11.) But
God approved Sarah’s action and said to Abraham: “Let it not be grievous
in thy sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all that
Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall thy
seed be called.” (Gen. 21:12.)

The Holy Ghost contemptuously calls the admirers of the Law the children
of the bondwoman. “If you do not know your mother, I will tell you what
kind of a woman she is. She is a slave. And you are slaves. You are slaves
of the Law and therefore slaves of sin, death, and everlasting damnation.
You are not fit to be heirs. You are put out of the house.”

This is the sentence which God pronounces upon the Ishmaelites, the
papists, and all others who trust in their own merits, and persecute the
Church of Christ. Because they are slaves and persecutors of the children of
the free woman, they shall be cast out of the house of God forever. They
shall have no inheritance with the children of the promise. This sentence
stands forever.

This sentence affects not only those popes, cardinals bishops, and monks
who were notoriously wicked and made their bellies their Gods. It strikes,
also, those who lived in all sincerity to please God and to merit the
forgiveness of their sins through a life of self-denial. Even these will be
cast out, because they are children of the bondwoman.

Our opponents do not defend their own moral delinquency. The better
ones deplore and abhor it. But they defend and uphold their doctrine of
works which is of the devil. Our quarrel is not with those who live in
manifest sins. Our quarrel is with those among them who think they live
like angels, claiming that they do not only perform the Ten
Commandments of God, but also the sayings of Christ, and many good
works that God does not expect of them. We quarrel with them because
they refuse to have Jesus’ merit count alone for righteousness.

St. Bernard was one of the best of the medieval saints. He lived a chaste
and holy life. But when it came to dying he did not trust in his chaste life
for salvation. He prayed: “I have lived a wicked life. But Thou, Lord Jesus,
hast a heaven to give unto me. First, because Thou art the Son of God.
Secondly, because Thou hast purchased heaven for me by Thy suffering
and death. Thou givest heaven to me, not because I earned it, but because
Thou hast earned it for me.” If any of the Romanists are saved it is because
they forget their good deeds and merits and feel like Paul: “Not having
mine own righteousness which is of the law, but that which is through the
faith of Christ.” (Phil. 3:9.)

  VERSE 31. So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but
  of the free.

With this sentence the Apostle Paul concludes his allegory of the barren
Church. This sentence forms a clear rejection of the righteousness of the
Law and a confirmation of the doctrine of justification. In the next chapter
Paul lays special stress upon the freedom which the children of the free
woman enjoy. He treats of Christian liberty, the knowledge of which is
very necessary. The liberty which Christ purchased for us is a bulwark to us
in our battle against spiritual tyranny. Therefore we must carefully study
this doctrine of Christian liberty, not only for the confirmation of the
doctrine of justification, but also for the comfort and encouragement of
those who are weak in faith.

                                  CHAPTER 5

IN this chapter the Apostle Paul presents the doctrine of Christian liberty
in a final effort to persuade the Galatians to give up the nefarious doctrine
of the false apostles. To accomplish his purpose he adduces threats and
promises, trying in every way possible to keep them in the liberty which
Christ purchased for them.

  VERSE 1. Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made
  us free.

“Be steadfast, not careless. Lie not down and sleep, but stand up. Be
watchful. Hold fast the liberty wherewith Christ hath made you free.”
Those who loll cannot keep this liberty. Satan hates the light of the Gospel.
When it begins to shine a little he fights against it with might and main.

What liberty does Paul mean? Not civil liberty (for which we have the
government to thank), but the liberty which Christ has procured for us.

At one time the emperor was compelled to grant to the bishop of Rome
certain immunities and privileges. This is civil liberty. That liberty
exempts the clergy from certain public charges. Then there is also another
kind of “liberty,” when people obey neither the laws of God nor the laws
of men, but do as they please. This carnal liberty the people want in our
day. We are not now speaking of this liberty. Neither are we speaking of
civil liberty.

Paul is speaking of a far better liberty, the liberty “wherewith Christ hath
made us free,” not from material bonds, not from the Babylonian
captivity, not from the tyranny of the Turks, but from the eternal wrath of

Where is this liberty?

In the conscience.

Our conscience is free and quiet because it no longer has to fear the wrath
of God. This is real liberty, compared with which every other kind of
liberty is not worth mentioning. Who can adequately express the boon
that comes to a person when he has the heart-assurance that God will
nevermore be angry with him, but will forever be merciful to him for
Christ’s sake? This is indeed a marvelous liberty, to have the sovereign
God for our Friend and Father who will defend, maintain, and save us in
this life and in the life to come.

As an outgrowth of this liberty, we are at the same time free from the Law,
sin, death, the power of the devil, hell, etc. Since the wrath of God has
been assuaged by Christ no Law, sin, or death may now accuse and
condemn us. These foes of ours will continue to frighten us, but not too
much. The worth of our Christian liberty cannot be exaggerated.

Our conscience must he trained to fall back on the freedom purchased for
us by Christ. Though the fears of the Law, the terrors of sin, the horror of
death assail us occasionally, we know that these feelings shall not endure,
because the prophet quotes God as saying: “In a little wrath I hid my face
from thee for a moment: but with everlasting kindness will I have mercy
on thee.” (Isa. 54:8.)

We shall appreciate this liberty all the more when we bear in mind that it
was Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who purchased it with His own blood.
Hence, Christ’s liberty is given us not by the Law, or for our own
righteousness, but freely for Christ’s sake. In the eighth chapter of the
Gospel of St. John, Jesus declares: “If the Son shall make you free, ye shall
be free indeed.” He only stands between us and the evils which trouble
and afflict us and which He has overcome for us.

Reason cannot properly evaluate this gift. Who can fully appreciate the
blessing of the forgiveness of sins and of everlasting life? Our opponents
claim that they also possess this liberty. But they do not. When they are
put to the test all their self-confidence slips from them. What else can they
expect when they trust in works and not in the Word of God?

Our liberty is founded on Christ Himself, who sits at the right hand of God
and intercedes for us. Therefore our liberty is sure and valid as long as we
believe in Christ. As long as we cling to Him with a steadfast faith we
possess His priceless gifts. But if we are careless and indifferent we shall
lose them. It is not without good reason that Paul urges us to watch and to
stand fast. He knew that the devil delights in taking this liberty away from

  VERSE 1. And be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.

Because reason prefers the righteousness of the Law to the righteousness
of faith, Paul calls the Law a yoke, a yoke of bondage. Peter also calls it a
yoke. “Why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples
which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?” (Acts 15:10.)

In this passage Paul again disparages the pernicious notion that the Law is
able to make men righteous before God, a notion deeply rooted in man’s
reason. All mankind is so wrapped up in this idea that it is hard to drag it
out of people. Paul compares those who seek to be justified by the Law to
oxen that are hitched to the yoke. Like oxen that toil in the yoke all day,
and in the evening are turned out to graze along the dusty road, and at last
are marked for slaughter when they no longer can draw the burden, so
those who seek to be justified by the Law are “entangled with the yoke of
bondage,” and when they have grown old and broken-down in the service
of the Law they have earned for their perpetual reward God’s wrath and
everlasting torment.

We are not now treating of an unimportant matter. It is a matter that
involves everlasting liberty or everlasting slavery. For as a liberation from
God’s wrath through the kind office of Christ is not a passing boon, but a
permanent blessing, so also the yoke of the Law is not a temporary but an
everlasting affliction.

Rightly are the doors of the Law called devil’s martyrs. They take more
pains to earn hell than the martyrs of Christ to obtain heaven. Theirs is a
double misfortune. First they torture themselves on earth with self-
inflicted penances and finally when they die they gain the reward of eternal

  VERSE 2. Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ
  shall profit you nothing.

Paul is incensed at the thought of the tyranny of the Law. His antagonism
to the Law is a personal matter with him. “Behold, I, Paul,” he says, “I who
have received the Gospel not from men, but by the revelation of Jesus
Christ: I who have been commissioned from above to preach the Gospel to
you: I Paul say to you, If you submit to circumcision Christ will profit you
nothing.” Paul emphatically declares that for the Galatians to be
circumcised would mean for them to lose the benefits of Christ’s suffering
and death. This passage may well serve as a criterion for all the religions.
To teach that besides faith in Christ other devices like works, or the
observance of rules, traditions, or ceremonies are necessary for the
attainment of righteousness and everlasting life, is to make Christ and His
salvation of no benefit to anybody.

This passage is an indictment of the whole papacy. All priests, monks, and
nuns–and I am now speaking of the best of them–who repose their
hope for salvation in their own works, and not in Christ, whom they
imagine to he an angry judge, hear this sentence pronounced against them
that Christ shall profit them nothing. If one can earn the forgiveness of
sins and everlasting life through one’s own efforts to what purpose was
Christ born? What was the purpose of His suffering and death, His
resurrection, His victory over sin, death, and the devil, if men may
overcome these evils by their own endeavor? Tongue cannot express, nor
heart conceive what a terrible thing it is to make Christ worthless.

The person who is not moved by these considerations to leave the Law
and the confidence in his own righteousness for the liberty in Christ, has a
heart that is harder than stone and iron.

Paul does not condemn circumcision in itself. Circumcision is not
injurious to the person who does not ascribe any particular importance to
it. Neither are works injurious provided a person does not attach any
saving value to them. The Apostle does not say that works are
objectionable, but to build one’s hopes for righteousness on works is
disastrous, for that makes Christ good for nothing.

Let us bear this in mind when the devil accuses our conscience. When that
dragon accuses us of having done no good at all, but only evil, say to him:
“You trouble me with the remembrance of my past sins; you remind me
that I have done no good. But this does not bother me, because if I were to
trust in my own good deeds, or despair because I have done no good deeds,
Christ would profit me neither way. I am not going to make him
unprofitable to me. This I would do, if I should presume to purchase for
myself the favor of God and everlasting life by my good deeds, or if I
should despair of my salvation because of my sins.”

  VERSE 3. For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he
  is a debtor to do the whole law.

The first fault with circumcision is that it makes Christ unprofitable. The
second fault is that it obligates those who are circumcised to observe the
whole Law. Paul is so very much in earnest about this matter that he
confirms it with an oath. “I testify,” he says, “I swear by the living God.”
Paul’s statement may be explained negatively to mean: “I testify to every
man who is being circumcised that he cannot perform the Law in any
point. In the very act of circumcision he is not being circumcised, and in
the very act of fulfilling the Law he fulfills it not.” This seems to be the
simple meaning of Paul’s statement. Later on in the sixth chapter he
explicitly states, “They themselves which are circumcised keep not the
law. The fact that you are circumcised does not mean you are righteous
and free from the Law. The truth is that by circumcision you have become
debtors and servants of the Law. The more you endeavor to perform the
Law, the more you will become tangled up in the yoke of the Law.”

The truth of this I have experienced in myself and in others. I have seen
many work themselves down to the bones in their hungry effort to obtain
peace of conscience. But the harder they tried the more they worried.
Especially in the presence of death they were so uneasy that I have seen
murderers die with better grace and courage.

This holds true also in regard to the church regulations. When I was a
monk I tried ever so hard to live up to the strict rules of my order. I used
to make a list of my sins, and I was always on the way to confession, and
whatever penances were enjoined upon me I performed religiously. In
spite of it all, my conscience was always in a fever of doubt. The more I
sought to help my poor stricken conscience the worse it got. The more I
paid attention to the regulations the more I transgressed them.

Hence those that seek to be justified by the Law are much further away
from the righteousness of life than the publicans, sinners, and harlots.
They know better than to trust in their own works. They know that they
cannot ever hope to obtain forgiveness by their sins.

Paul’s statement in this verse may be taken to mean that those who
submit to circumcision are thereby submitting to the whole Law. To obey
Moses in one point requires obedience to him in all points. It does no good
to say that only circumcision is necessary, and not the rest of Moses’ laws.
The same reasons that obligate a person to accept circumcision also
obligate a person to accept the whole Law. Thus to acknowledge the Law is
tantamount to declaring that Christ is not yet come. And if Christ is not
yet come, then all the Jewish ceremonies and laws concerning meats,
places, and times are still in force, and Christ must be awaited as one who
is still to come. The whole Scripture, however, testifies that Christ has
come, that by His death He has abolished the Law, and that He has fulfilled
all things which the prophets have foretold about Him.

Some would like to subjugate us to certain parts of the Mosaic Law. But
this is not to be permitted under any circumstances. If we permit Moses to
rule over us in one thing, we must obey him in all things.

  VERSE 4. Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are
  justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.

Paul in this verse discloses that he is not speaking so much of
circumcision as the trust which men repose in the outward act. We can
hear him say: “I do not condemn the Law in itself; what I condemn is that
men seek to be justified by the Law, as if Christ were still to come, or as if
He alone were unable to justify sinners. It is this that I condemn, because it
makes Christ of no effect. It makes you void of Christ so that Christ is not
in you, nor can you be partakers of the knowledge, the spirit, the
fellowship, the liberty, the life, or the achievements of Christ. You are
completely separated from Him, so much so that He has nothing to do
with you any more, or for that matter you with Him.” Can anything worse
be said against the Law? If you think Christ and the Law can dwell together
in your heart, you may be sure that Christ dwells not in your heart. For if
Christ is in your heart He neither condemns you, nor does He ever bid
you to trust in your own good works. If you know Christ at all, you know
that good works do not serve unto righteousness, nor evil works unto
condemnation. I do not want to withhold from good works their due
praise, nor do I wish to encourage evil works. But when it comes to
justification, I say, we must concentrate upon Christ alone, or else we
make Him non-effective .You must choose between Christ and the
righteousness of the Law. If you choose Christ you are righteous before
God. If you stick to the Law, Christ is of no use to you.

  VERSE 4. Ye are fallen from grace.

That means you are no longer in the kingdom or condition of grace.
When a person on board ship falls into the sea and is drowned it makes
no difference from which end or side of the ship he falls into the water.
Those who fall from grace perish no matter how they go about it. Those
who seek to be justified by the Law are fallen from grace and are in grave
danger of eternal death. If this holds true in the case of those who seek to
be justified by the moral Law, what will become of those, I should like to
know, who endeavor to be justified by their own regulations and vows?
They will fall to the very bottom of hell. “Oh, no,” they say, “we will fly
straight into heaven. If you live according to the rules of Saint Francis,
Saint Dominick, Saint Benedict, you will obtain the peace and mercy of
God. If you perform the vows of chastity, obedience, etc., you will be
rewarded with everlasting life.” Let these playthings of the devil go to the
place where they came from and listen to what Paul has to say in this
verse in accordance with Christ’s own teaching: “He that believeth in the
Son of God, hath everlasting life; but he that believeth not in the Son shall
not see life, but the wrath of God abideth in him.”

The words, “Ye are fallen from grace,” must not be taken lightly. They are
important. To fall from grace means to lose the atonement, the
forgiveness of sins, the righteousness, liberty, and life which Jesus has
merited for us by His death and resurrection. To lose the grace of God
means to gain the wrath and judgment of God, death, the bondage of the
devil, and everlasting condemnation.

  VERSE 6. For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness
  by faith.

Paul concludes the whole matter with the above statement. “You want to
be justified by the Law, by circumcision, and by works. We cannot see it. To
be justified by such means would make Christ of no value to us. We would
be obliged to perform the whole law. We rather through the Spirit wait for
the hope of righteousness.” The Apostle is not satisfied to say “justified
by faith.” He adds hope to faith.

Holy Writ speaks of hope in two ways: as the object of the emotion, and
hope as the emotion itself. In the first chapter of the Epistle to the
Colossians we have an instance of its first use: “For the hope which is laid
up for you in heaven,” i.e., the thing hoped for. In the sense of emotion
we quote the passage from the eighth chapter of the Epistle to the Romans:
“For we are saved by hope.” As Paul uses the term “hope” here in writing
to the Galatians, we may take it in either of its two meanings. We may
understand Paul to say, “We wait in spirit, through faith, for the
righteousness that we hope for, which in due time will be revealed to us.”
Or we may understand Paul to say: “We wait in Spirit, by faith for
righteousness with great hope and desire.” True, we are righteous, but our
righteousness is not yet revealed; as long as we live here sin stays with us,
not to forget the law in our members striving against the law of our mind.
When sin rages in our body and we through the Spirit wrestle against it,
then we have cause for hope. We are not yet perfectly righteous. Perfect
righteousness is still to be attained. Hence we hope for it.

This is sweet comfort for us. And we are to make use of it in comforting
the afflicted. We are to say to them: “Brother, you would like to feel God’s
favor as you feel your sin. But you are asking too much. Your righteousness
rests on something much better than feelings. Wait and hope until it will
be revealed to you in the Lord’s own time. Don’t go by your feelings, but go
by the doctrine of faith, which pledges Christ to you.”

The question occurs to us, What difference is there between faith and
hope? We find it difficult to see any difference. Faith and hope are so
closely linked that they cannot be separated. Still there is a difference
between them.

  First, hope and faith differ in regard to their sources. Faith
  originates in the understanding, while hope rises in the will.

  Secondly, they differ in regard to their functions. Faith says what is
  to be done. Faith teaches, describes, directs. Hope exhorts the mind
  to be strong and courageous.

  Thirdly, they differ in regard to their objectives. Faith concentrates
  on the truth. Hope looks to the goodness of God.

  Fourthly, they differ in sequence. Faith is the beginning of life before
  tribulation. (Hebrews 11.) Hope comes later and is born of tribulation.
  (Romans 5.)

  Fifthly, they differ in regard to their effects. Faith is a judge. It
  judges errors. Hope is a soldier. It fights against tribulations, the
  Cross, despondency, despair, and waits for better things to come in the
  midst of evil.
Without hope faith cannot endure. On the other hand, hope without faith
is blind rashness and arrogance because it lacks knowledge. Before
anything else a Christian must have the insight of faith, so that the
intellect may know its directions in the day of trouble and the heart may
hope for better things. By faith we begin, by hope we continue.

This passage contains excellent doctrine and much comfort. It declares that
we are justified not by works, sacrifices, or ceremonies, but by Christ alone.
The world may judge certain things to be ever so good; without Christ
they are all wrong. Circumcision and the law and good works are carnal.
“We,” says Paul, “are above such things. We possess Christ by faith and in
the midst of our afflictions we hopefully wait for the consummation of
our righteousness.”

You may say, “The trouble is I don’t feel as if I am righteous.” You must
not feel, but believe. Unless you believe that you are righteous, you do
Christ a great wrong, for He has cleansed you by the washing of
regeneration, He died for you so that through Him you may obtain
righteousness and everlasting life.

  VERSE 6. For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing,
  nor uncircumcision, but faith which worketh by love.

Faith must of course be sincere. It must be a faith that performs good
works through love. If faith lacks love it is not true faith. Thus the Apostle
bars the way of hypocrites to the kingdom of Christ on all sides. He
declares on the one hand, “In Christ Jesus circumcision availeth nothing,”
i.e., works avail nothing, but faith alone, and that without any merit
whatever, avails before God. On the other hand, the Apostle declares that
without fruits faith serves no purpose. To think, “If faith justifies without
works, let us work nothing,” is to despise the grace of God. Idle faith is not
justifying faith. In this terse manner Paul presents the whole life of a
Christian. Inwardly it consists in faith towards God, outwardly in love
towards our fellow-men.

  VERSE 7. Ye did run well; who did hinder you that ye should not obey
  the truth?

This is plain speaking. Paul asserts that he teaches the same truth now
which he has always taught, and that the Galatians ran well as long as they
obeyed the truth. But now, misled by the false apostles, they no longer run.
He compares the Christian life to a race. When everything runs along
smoothly the Hebrews spoke of it as a race. “Ye did run well,” means that
everything went along smoothly and happily with the Galatians. They
lived a Christian life and were on the right way to everlasting life. The
words, “Ye did run well,” are encouraging indeed. Often our lives seem to
creep rather than to run. But if we abide in the true doctrine and walk in
the spirit, we have nothing to worry about. God judges our lives differently.
What may seem to us a life slow in Christian development may seem to
God a life of rapid progression in grace.

  VERSE 7. Who did hinder you that ye should not obey the truth?
The Galatians were hindered in the Christian life when they turned from
faith and grace to the Law. Covertly the Apostle blames the false apostles
for impeding the Christian progress of the Galatians. The false apostles
persuaded the Galatians to believe that they were in error and that they
had made little or no progress under the influence of Paul. Under the
baneful influence of the false apostles the Galatians thought they were
well off and advancing rapidly in Christian knowledge and living.

  VERSE 8. This persuasion cometh not of him that calleth you.

Paul explains how those who had been deceived by false teachers may be
restored to spiritual health. The false apostles were amiable fellows.
Apparently they surpassed Paul in learning and godliness. The Galatians
were easily deceived by outward appearances. They supposed they were
being taught by Christ Himself. Paul proved to them that their new
doctrine was not of Christ, but of the devil. In this way he succeeded in
regaining many. We also are able to win back many from the errors into
which they were seduced by showing that their beliefs are imaginary,
wicked, and contrary to the Word of God.

The devil is a cunning persuader. He knows how to enlarge the smallest
sin into a mountain until we think we have committed the worst crime
ever committed on earth. Such stricken consciences must be comforted
and set straight as Paul corrected the Galatians by showing them that their
opinion is not of Christ because it runs counter to the Gospel, which
describes Christ as a meek and merciful Savior.

Satan will circumvent the Gospel and explain Christ in this his own
diabolical way: “Indeed Christ is meek, gentle, and merciful, but only to
those who are holy and righteous. If you are a sinner you stand no chance.
Did not Christ say that unbelievers are already damned? And did not
Christ perform many good deeds, and suffer many evils patiently, bidding
us to follow His example? You do not mean to say that your life is in
accord with Christ’s precepts or example? You are a sinner. You are no
good at all.”

Satan is to be answered in this way: The Scriptures present Christ in a
twofold aspect. First, as a gift. “He of God is made unto us wisdom, and
righteousness, and sanctification and redemption.” (I Cor. 1:30.) Hence my
many and grievous sins are nullified if I believe in Him. Secondly, the
Scriptures present Christ for our example. As an exemplar He is to be
placed before me only at certain times. In times of joy and gladness that l
may have Him as a mirror to reflect upon my shortcomings. But in the
day of trouble I will have Christ only as a gift. I will not listen to
anything else, except that Christ died for my sins.

To those that are cast down on account of their sins Christ must be
introduced as a Savior and Gift, and not as an example. But to sinners who
live in a false assurance, Christ must be introduced as an example. The
hard sayings of Scripture and the awful judgments of God upon sin must
be impressed upon them. Defy Satan in times of despair. Say: “O cursed
Satan, you choose a nice time to talk to me about doing and working when
you know very well that I am in trouble over my sins. I will not listen to
you. I will listen to Christ, who says that He came into the world to save
sinners. This is the true Christ and there is none other. I can find plenty of
examples for a holy life in Abraham, Isaiah, John the Baptist, Paul, and
other saints. But they cannot forgive my sins. They cannot save me. They
cannot procure for me everlasting life. Therefore I will not have you for
my teacher, O Satan.”

  VERSE 9. A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.

Paul’s concern for them meant nothing to some of the Galatians. Many
had disowned him as their teacher and gone over to the false apostles. No
doubt the false apostles took every occasion to defame Paul as a stubborn
and contemptuous fellow who thought nothing of disrupting the unity of
the churches for no other reason than his selfish pride and jealousy.

Others of the Galatians perhaps saw no harm in deviating a trifle from the
doctrine of justification and faith. When they noticed that Paul made so
much ado about a matter that seemed of no particular importance to them
they raised their eyebrows and thought within themselves: “What if we
did deviate a little from the doctrine of Paul? What if we are a little to
blame? He ought to overlook the whole matter, and not make such an
issue out of it, lest the unity of the churches be disturbed.” To this Paul
replies: “A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.”

Our opponents record the same complaints about us. They put us down as
contentious, ill-tempered faultfinders. But these are the crafty passes of the
devil, with which he seeks to overthrow our faith. We answer with Paul:
“A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.”

Small faults grow into big faults. To tolerate a trifling error inevitably
leads to crass heresy. The doctrine of the Bible is not ours to take or to
allow liberties with. We have no right to change even a tittle of it. When
it comes to life we are ready to do, to suffer, to forgive anything our
opponents demand as long as faith and doctrine remain pure and
uncorrupt. The Apostle James says, “For whosoever shall keep the whole
law and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.” This passage supports
us over against our critics who claim that we disregard all charity to the
great injury of the churches. We protest we desire nothing more than
peace with all men. If they would only permit us to keep our doctrine of
faith! The pure doctrine takes precedence before charity, apostles, or an
angel from heaven.

Let others praise charity and concord to the skies; we magnify the
authority of the Word and faith. Charity may be neglected at times
without peril, but not the Word and faith. Charity suffers all things, it
gives in. Faith suffers nothing; it never yields. Charity is often deceived
but is never put out because it lies nothing to lose; it continues to do well
even to the ungrateful. When it comes to faith and salvation in the midst
of lies and errors that parade as truth and deceive many, charity has no
voice or vote. Let us not be influenced by the popular cry for charity and
unity. If we do not love God and His Word what difference does it make if
we love anything at all?

Paul, therefore, admonishes both teachers and hearers not to esteem
lightly the doctrine of faith as if it were a toy with which to amuse
oneself in idle hours.

  VERSE 10. l have confidence in you through the Lord.

“I have taught, admonished, and reproved you enough. I hope the best for

The question occurs to us whether Paul did well to trust the Galatians.
Does not Holy Writ forbid us to trust in men? Faith trusts in God and is
never wrong. Charity trusts in men and is often wrong. This charitable
trust in man is necessary to life. Without it life would be impossible in the
world. What kind of life would ours be if nobody could trust anybody else?
True Christians are more ready to believe in men than the children of this
world. Such charitable confidence is the fruit of the Spirit. Paul had such
trust in the Galatians although they had forsaken his doctrine. He trusts
them “through the Lord,” insofar as they were in Christ and Christ in
them. Once they had forsaken Christ altogether, the Apostle will trust the
Galatians no longer.

  VERSE 10. That ye will be none otherwise minded.

“Not minded otherwise than I have taught you. In other words, I have
confidence that you will accept no doctrine that is contrary to the one you
have learned from me.”

  VERSE 10. But be that troubleth you shall bear his judgment, whosoever
  he be.

Paul assumes the role of a judge and condemns the false apostles as
troublers of the Galatians. He wants to frighten the Galatians with his
severe judgments of the false apostles into avoiding false doctrine like a
contagious disease. We can hear him say to the Galatians: “Why do you
give these pestilent fellows a hearing in the first place? They only trouble
you. The doctrine they bring causes your conscience only trouble.”

The clause, “whosoever he be,” seems to indicate that the false apostles in
outward appearance at least were very good and devout men. It may be
that among them was some outstanding disciple of the apostles, a man of
fame and authority. The Apostle must have been faced by this very
situation, otherwise his vehemence would have been uncalled for. No
doubt many of the Galatians were taken back with the vehemency of the
Apostle. They perhaps thought: why should he be so stubborn in such
small matters? Why is he so quick to pronounce damnation upon his
brethren in the ministry?

I cannot say it often enough, that we must carefully differentiate between
doctrine and life. Doctrine is a piece of heaven, life is a piece of earth.
Life is sin, error, uncleanness, misery, and charity must forbear, believe,
hope, and suffer all things. Forgiveness of sins must be continuous so
that sin and error may not be defended and sustained. But with doctrine
there must be no error, no need of pardon. There can be no comparison
between doctrine and life. The least little point of doctrine is of greater
importance than heaven and earth. Therefore we cannot allow the least
jot of doctrine to be corrupted. We may overlook the offenses and errors of
life, for we daily sin much. Even the saints sin, as they themselves confess
in the Lord’s Prayer and in the Creed. But our doctrine, God be praised, is
pure, because all the articles of our faith are grounded on the Holy

  VERSE 11. And I, brethren, if I yet preach circumcision, why do I yet
  suffer persecution? then is the offense of the cross ceased.

In his great desire to recall the Galatians, Paul draws himself into the
argument. He says: “Because I refuse to recognize circumcision as a factor
in our salvation, I have brought upon myself the hatred and persecution of
my whole nation. If I were to acknowledge circumcision the Jews would
cease to persecute me; in fact they would love and praise me. But because I
preach the Gospel of Christ and the righteousness of faith I must suffer
persecution. The false apostles know how to avoid the Cross and the deadly
hatred of the Jewish nation. They preach circumcision and thus retain the
favor of the Jews. If they had their way they would ignore all differences in
doctrine and preserve unity at all cost. But their unionistic dreams cannot
be realized without loss to the pure doctrine of the Cross. It would be too
bad if the offense of the Cross were to cease.” To the Corinthians he
expressed the same conviction: “Christ sent me. . .to preach the gospel: not
with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none
effect.” (I Cor. 1:17.)

Here someone may be tempted to call the Christians crazy. Deliberately to
court danger by preaching and confessing the truth, and thus to bring
upon ourselves the hatred and enmity of the whole world, is this not
madness? But Paul does not mind the enmity of the world. It made him
all the bolder to confess Christ. The enmity of the world in his estimation
augurs well for the success and growth of the Church, which fares best in
times of persecution. When the offense of the Cross ceases, when the rage
of the enemies of the Cross abates, when everything is quiet, it is a sign
that the devil is the door-keeper of the Church and that the pure doctrine
of God’s Word has been lost.

Saint Bernard observed that the Church is in best shape when Satan
assaults it on every side by trickery and violence; and in worst shape when
it is at peace. In support of his statement he quotes the passage from the
song of Hezekiah: “Behold, for peace I had great bitterness.” Paul looks
with suspicion upon any doctrine that does not provoke antagonism.

Persecution always follows on the heels of the Word of God as the
Psalmist experienced. “I believe, therefore have I spoken: I was greatly
afflicted.” (Ps. 116:10.) The Christians are accused and slandered without
mercy. Murderers and thieves receive better treatment than Christians.
The world regards true Christians as the worst offenders, for whom no
punishment can be too severe. The world hates the Christians with
amazing brutality, and without compunction commits them to the most
shameful death, congratulating itself that it has rendered God and the
cause of peace a distinct service by ridding the world of the undesired
presence of these Christians. We are not to let such treatment cause us to
falter in our adherence to Christ. As long as we experience such
persecutions we know all is well with the Gospel.

Jesus held out the same comfort to His disciples in the fifth chapter of St.
Matthew. “Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you and persecute you,
and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. Rejoice,
and be exceeding glad; for great is your reward in heaven.” The Church
must not come short of this joy. I would not want to be at peace with the
pope, the bishops, the princes, and the sectarians, unless they consent to
our doctrine. Unity with them would be an unmistakable sign that we
have lost the true doctrine. Briefly, as long as the Church proclaims the
doctrine she must suffer persecution, because the Gospel declares the
mercy and glory of God. This in turn stirs up the devil, because the Gospel
shows him up for what he is, the devil, and not God. Therefore as long as
the Gospel holds sway persecution plays the accompaniment, or else there
is something the matter with the devil. When he is hit you will know it
by the havoc he raises everywhere.

So do not be surprised or offended when hell breaks loose. Look upon it as
a happy indication that all is well with the Gospel of the Cross. God forbid
that the offense of the Cross should ever be removed. This would be the
case if we were to preach what the prince of this world and his followers
would be only too glad to hear, the righteousness of works. You would
never know the devil could be so gentle, the world so sweet, the Pope so
gracious, and the princes so charming. But because we seek the advantage
and honor of Christ, they persecute us all around.

  VERSE 12. I would they were even cut off which trouble you.

It hardly seems befitting an apostle, not only to denounce the false apostles
as troublers of the Church, and to consign them to the devil, but also to
wish that they were utterly cut off–what else would you call it but plain
cursing? Paul, I suppose, is alluding to the rite of circumcision. As if he
were saying to the Galatians: “The false apostles compel you to cut off the
foreskin of your flesh. Well, I wish they themselves were utterly cut off by
the roots.”

We had better answer at once the question, whether it is right for
Christians to curse. Certainly not always, nor for every little cause. But
when things have come to such a pass that God and His Word are openly
blasphemed, then we must say: “Blessed be God and His Word, and cursed
be everything that is contrary to God and His Word, even though it
should be an apostle, or an angel from heaven.”

This goes to show again how much importance Paul attached to the least
points of Christian doctrine, that he dared to curse the false apostles,
evidently men of great popularity and influence. What right, then, have
we to make little of doctrine? No matter how nonessential a point of
doctrine may seem, if slighted it may prove the gradual disintegration of
the truths of our salvation.

Let us do everything to advance the glory and authority of God’s Word.
Every tittle of it is greater than heaven and earth. Christian charity and
unity have nothing to do with the Word of God. We are bold to curse and
condemn all men who in the least point corrupt the Word of God, “for a
little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.”

Paul does right to curse these troublers of the Galatians, wishing that they
were cut off and rooted out of the Church of God and that their doctrine
might perish forever. Such cursing is the gift of the Holy Ghost. Thus
Peter cursed Simon the sorcerer, “Thy money perish with thee.” Many
instances of this holy cursing are recorded in the sacred Scriptures,
especially in the Psalms, e.g., “Let death seize upon them, and let them go
down quick into hell.” (Ps. 55:15.)

                        THE DOCTRINE OF GOOD WORKS

Now come all kinds of admonitions and precepts. It was the custom of the
apostles that after they had taught faith and instructed the conscience they
followed it up with admonitions unto good works, that the believers
might manifest the duties of love toward each other. In order to avoid the
appearance as if Christianity militated against good works or opposed civil
government, the Apostle also urges us to give ourselves unto good works,
to lead an honest life, and to keep faith and love with one another. This
will give the lie to the accusations of the world that we Christians are the
enemies of decency and of public peace. The fact is we Christians know
better what constitutes a truly good work than all the philosophers and
legislators of the world because we link believing with doing.

  VERSE 13. For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not
liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.

In other words: “You have gained liberty through Christ, i.e., You are
above all laws as far as conscience is concerned. You are saved. Christ is
your liberty and life. Therefore law, sin, and death may not hurt you or
drive you to despair. This is the constitution of your priceless liberty. Now
take care that you do not use your wonderful liberty for an occasion of the

Satan likes to turn this liberty which Christ has gotten for us into
licentiousness. Already the Apostle Jude complained in his day: “There
are certain men crept in unawares. . .turning the grace of our God into
lasciviousness.” (Jude 4.) The flesh reasons: “If we are without the law, we
may as well indulge ourselves. Why do good, why give alms, why suffer
evil when there is no law to force us to do so?”

This attitude is common enough. People talk about Christian liberty and
then go and cater to the desires of covetousness, pleasure, pride, envy, and
other vices. Nobody wants to fulfill his duties. Nobody wants to help out a
brother in distress. This sort of thing makes me so impatient at times that I
wish the swine who trampled precious pearls under foot were back once
again under the tyranny of the Pope. You cannot wake up the people of
Gomorrah with the gospel of peace.

Even we creatures of the world do not perform our duties as zealously in
the light of the Gospel as we did before in the darkness of ignorance,
because the surer we are of the liberty purchased for us by Christ, the more
we neglect the Word, prayer, well-doing, and suffering. If Satan were not
continually molesting us with trials, with the persecution of our enemies,
and the ingratitude of our brethren, we would become so careless and
indifferent to all good works that in time we would lose our faith in
Christ, resign the ministry of the Word, and look for an easier life. Many
of our ministers are beginning to do that very thing. They complain about
the ministry, they maintain they cannot live on their salaries, they
whimper about the miserable treatment they receive at the hand of those
whom they delivered from the servitude of the law by the preaching of
the Gospel. These ministers desert our poor and maligned Christ, involve
themselves in the affairs of the world, seek advantages for themselves and
not for Christ. With what results they shall presently find out.

Since the devil lies in ambush for those in particular who hate the world,
and seeks to deprive us of our liberty of the spirit or to brutalize it into
the liberty of the flesh, we plead with our brethren after the manner of
Paul, that they may never use this liberty of the spirit purchased for us by
Christ as an excuse for carnal living, or as Peter expresses it, I Peter 2:16,
“for a cloak of maliciousness.”

In order that Christians may not abuse their liberty the Apostle encumbers
them with the rule of mutual love that they should serve each other in
love. Let everybody perform the duties of his station and vocation
diligently and help his neighbor to the limit of his capacity.

Christians are glad to hear and obey this teaching of love. When others
hear about this Christian liberty of ours they at once infer, “If I am free, I
may do what I like. If salvation is not a matter of doing why should we do
anything for the poor?” In this crude manner they turn the liberty of the
spirit into wantonness and licentiousness. We want them to know,
however, that if they use their lives and possessions after their own
pleasure, if they do not help the poor, if they cheat their fellow-men in
business and snatch and scrape by hook and by crook everything they can
lay their hands on, we want to tell them that they are not free, no matter
how much they think they are, but they are the dirty slaves of the devil,
and are seven times worse than they ever were as the slaves of the Pope.

As for us, we are obliged to preach the Gospel which offers to all men
liberty from the Law, sin, death, and God’s wrath. We have no right to
conceal or revoke this liberty proclaimed by the Gospel. And so we cannot
do anything with the swine who dive headlong into the filth of
licentiousness. We do what we can, we diligently admonish them to love
and to help their fellow-men. If our admonitions bear no fruit, we leave
them to God, who will in His own good time take care of these
disrespecters of His goodness. In the meanwhile we comfort ourselves
with the thought that our labors are not lost upon the true believers. They
appreciate this spiritual liberty and stand ready to serve others in love and,
though their number is small, the satisfaction they give us far outweighs
the discouragement which we receive at the hands of the large number of
those who misuse this liberty.

Paul cannot possibly be misunderstood for he says: “Brethren, ye have been
called unto liberty.” In order that nobody might mistake the liberty of
which he speaks for the liberty of the flesh, the Apostle adds the
explanatory note, “only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by
love serve one another.” Paul now explains at the hand of the Ten
Commandments what it means to serve one another in love.

  VERSE 14. For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this, thou
  shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

It is customary with Paul to lay the doctrinal foundation first and then to
build on it the gold, silver, and gems of good deeds. Now there is no other
foundation than Jesus Christ. Upon this foundation the Apostle erects the
structure of good works which he defines in this one sentence: “Thou
shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.”

In adding such precepts of love the Apostle embarrasses the false apostles
very much, as if he were saying to the Galatians: “I have described to you
what spiritual life is. Now I will also teach you what truly good works are.
I am doing this in order that you may understand that the silly ceremonies
of which the false apostles make so much are far inferior to the works of
Christian love.” This is the hall-mark of all false teachers, that they not
only pervert the pure doctrine but also fail in doing good. Their
foundation vitiated, they can only build wood, hay, and stubble. Oddly
enough, the false apostles who were such earnest champions of good
works never required the work of charity, such as Christian love and the
practical charity of a helpful tongue, hand, and heart. Their only
requirement was that circumcision, days, months, years, and times should
be observed. They could not think of any other good works.

The Apostle exhorts all Christians to practice good works after they have
embraced the pure doctrine of faith, because even though they have been
justified they still have the old flesh to refrain them from doing good.
Therefore it becomes necessary that sincere preachers cultivate the
doctrine of good works as diligently as the doctrine of faith, for Satan is a
deadly enemy of both. Nevertheless faith must come first because without
faith it is impossible to know what a God-pleasing deed is.

Let nobody think that he knows all about this commandment, “Thou
shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.” It sounds short and easy, but show me
the man who can teach, learn, and do this commandment perfectly. None
of us heed, or urge, or practice this commandment properly. Though the
conscience hurts when we fail to fulfill this commandment in every
respect we are not overwhelmed by our failure to bear our neighbor
sincere and brotherly love.

The words, “for all the law is fulfilled in one word,” entail a criticism of
the Galatians. “You are so taken up by your superstitions and ceremonies
that serve no good purpose, that you neglect the most important thing,
love.” St. Jerome says: “We wear our bodies out with watching, fasting,
and labor and neglect charity, the queen of all good works.” Look at the
monks, who meticulously fast, watch, etc. To skip the least requirement of
their order would be a crime of the first magnitude. At the same time they
blithely ignored the duties of charity and hated each other to death. That is
no sin, they think.

The Old Testament is replete with examples that indicate how much God
prizes charity. When David and his companions had no food with which
to still their hunger they ate the showbread which lay-people were
forbidden to eat. Christ’s disciples broke the Sabbath law when they
plucked the ears of corn. Christ himself broke the Sabbath (as the Jews
claimed) by healing the sick on the Sabbath. These incidents indicate that
love ought to be given consideration above all laws and ceremonies.

  VERSE 14. For all the Law is fulfilled in one word.

We can imagine the Apostle saying to the Galatians: “Why do you get so
worked up over ceremonies, meats, days, places, and such things? Leave
off this foolishness and listen to me. The whole Law is comprehended in
this one sentence, ‘Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.’ God is not
particularly interested in ceremonies, nor has He any use for them. The
one thing He requires of you is that you believe in Christ whom He hath
sent. If in addition to faith, which comes first as the most acceptable
service unto God, you want to add laws, then you want to know that all
laws are comprehended in this short commandment, ‘Thou shalt love thy
neighbour as thyself.’ “

Paul knows how to explain the law of God. He condenses all the laws of  Moses
into one brief sentence. Reason takes offense at the brevity with  which Paul
treats the Law. Therefore reason looks down upon the  doctrine of faith and
its truly good works. To serve one another in love,  i.e., to instruct the
erring, to comfort the afflicted, to raise the fallen, to  help one’s neighbor
in every possible way, to bear with his infirmities, to  endure hardships,
toil, ingratitude in the Church and in the world, and on  the other hand to
obey government, to honor one’s parents, to be patient  at home with a nagging
wife and an unruly family, these things are not at  all regarded as good
works. The fact is, they are such excellent works that  the world cannot
possibly estimate them at their true value.

It is tersely spoken: “Love thy neighbour as thyself.” But what more needs
to be said? You cannot find a better or nearer example than your own. If
you want to know how you ought to love your neighbor, ask yourself how
much you love yourself. If you were to get into trouble or danger, you
would be glad to have the love and help of all men. You do not need any
book of instructions to teach you how to love your neighbor. All you have
to do is to look into your own heart, and it will tell you how you ought to
love your neighbor as yourself.

My neighbor is every person, especially those who need my help, as Christ
explained in the tenth chapter of Luke. Even if a person has done me
some wrong, or has hurt me in any way, he is still a human being with
flesh and blood. As long as a person remains a human being, so long is he
to be an object of our love.

Paul therefore urges his Galatians and, incidentally, all believers to serve
each other in love. “You Galatians do not have to accept circumcision. If
you are so anxious to do good works, I will tell you in one word how you
can fulfill all laws. ‘By love serve one another.’ You will never lack people
to whom you may do good. The world is full of people who need your

  VERSE 15. But if ye bite and devour one another take heed that ye be
  not consumed one of another.

When faith in Christ is overthrown peace and unity come to an end in the
church. Diverse opinions and dissensions about doctrine and life spring
up, and one member bites and devours the other, i.e., they condemn each
other until they are consumed. To this the Scriptures and the experience
of all times bear witness. The many sects at present have come into being
because one sect condemns the other. When the unity of the spirit has
been lost there can be no agreement in doctrine or life. New errors must
appear without measure and without end.

For the avoidance of discord Paul lays down the principle: “Let every
person do his duty in the station of life into which God has called him. No
person is to vaunt himself above others or find fault with the efforts of
others while lauding his own. Let everybody serve in love.”

It is not an easy matter to teach faith without works, and still to require
works. Unless the ministers of Christ are wise in handling the mysteries of
God and rightly divide the word, faith and good works may easily be
confused. Both the doctrine of faith and the doctrine of good works must
be diligently taught, and yet in such a way that both the doctrines stay
within their God-given sphere. If we only teach words, as our opponents
do, we shall lose the faith. If we only teach faith people will come to think
that good works are superfluous.

  VERSE 16. This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not
  fulfill the lust of the flesh.

“I have not forgotten what I told you about faith in the first part of my
letter. Because I exhort you to mutual love you are not to think that I have
gone back on my teaching of justification by faith alone. I am still of the
same opinion. To remove every possibility for misunderstanding I have
added this explanatory note: ‘Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfill the
lust of the flesh.'”

With this verse Paul explains how he wants this sentence to be understood:
By love serve one another. When I bid you to love one another, this is what
I mean and require, ‘Walk in the Spirit.’ I know very well you will not
fulfill the Law, because you are sinners as long as you live. Nevertheless,
you should endeavor to walk in the spirit, i.e., fight against the flesh and
follow the leads of the Holy Ghost.”

It is quite apparent that Paul had not forgotten the doctrine of
justification,  for in bidding the Galatians to walk in the Spirit he at the
same time  denies that good works can justify. “When I speak of the fulfilling
of the  Law I do not mean to say that you are justified by the Law. All I mean
to  say is that you should take the Spirit for your guide and resist the
flesh.  That is the most you shall ever be able to do. Obey the Spirit and
fight  against the flesh.”

  VERSE 16. And ye shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh.

The lust of the flesh is not altogether extinct in us. It rises up again and
again and wrestles with the Spirit. No flesh, not even that of the true
believer, is so completely under the influence of the Spirit that it will not
bite or devour, or at least neglect, the commandment of love. At the
slightest provocation it flares up, demands to be revenged, and hates a
neighbor like an enemy, or at least does not love him as much as he ought
to be loved.

Therefore the Apostle establishes this rule of love for the believers. Serve
one another in love. Bear the infirmities of your brother. Forgive one
another. Without such bearing and forbearing, giving and forgiving, there
can be no unity because to give and to take offense are unavoidably

Whenever you are angry with your brother for any cause, repress your
violent emotions through the Spirit. Bear with his weakness and love
him. He does not cease to be your neighbor or brother because he offended
you. On the contrary, he now more than ever before requires your loving

The scholastics take the lust of the flesh to mean carnal lust. True,
believers too are tempted with carnal lust. Even the married are not
immune to carnal lusts. Men set little value upon that which they have
and covet what they have not, as the poet says:

  “The things most forbidden we always desire, And things most denied
  we seek to acquire.”

I do not deny that the lust of the flesh includes carnal lust. But it takes in
more. It takes in all the corrupt desires with which the believers are more
or less infected, as pride, hatred, covetousness, impatience. Later on Paul
enumerates among the works of the flesh even idolatry and heresy. The
apostle’s meaning is clear. “I want you to love one another. But you do
not do it. In fact you cannot do it, because of your flesh. Hence we cannot
be justified by deeds of love. Do not for a moment think that I am
reversing myself on my stand concerning faith. Faith and hope must
continue. By faith we are justified, by hope we endure to the end. In
addition we serve each other in love because true faith is not idle. Our
love, however, is faulty. In bidding you to walk in the Spirit I indicate to
you that our love is not sufficient to justify us. Neither do I demand that
you should get rid of the flesh, but that you should control and subdue it.”

  VERSE 17. For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit and the Spirit
  against the flesh.

When Paul declares that “the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit
against the flesh,” he means to say that we are not to think, speak or do the
things to which the flesh incites us. “I know,” he says, “that the flesh
courts sin. The thing for you to do is to resist the flesh by the Spirit. But
if you abandon the leadership of the Spirit for that of the flesh, you are
going to fulfill the lust of the flesh and die in your sins.”

  VERSE 17. And these are contrary the one to the other; so that ye
  cannot do the things that ye would.

These two leaders, the flesh and the Spirit, are bitter opponents. Of this
opposition the Apostle writes in the seventh chapter of the Epistle to the
Romans: “I see another law in my members, warring against the law of
my mind, and bringing me into the captivity to the law of sin which is in
my members. O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the
body of this death?”

The scholastics are at a loss to understand this confession of Paul and feel
obliged to save his honor. That the chosen vessel of Christ should have
had the law of sin in his members seems to them incredible and absurd.
They circumvent the plain-spoken statement of the Apostle by saying that
he was speaking for the wicked. But the wicked never complain of inner
conflicts, or of the captivity of sin. Sin has its unrestricted way with them.
This is Paul’s very own complaint and the identical complaint of all

Paul never denied that he felt the lust of the flesh. It is likely that at
times he felt even the stirrings of carnal lust, but there is no doubt that he
quickly suppressed them. And if at any time he felt angry or impatient, he
resisted these feelings by the Spirit. We are not going to stand by idly and
see such a comforting statement as this explained away. The scholastics,
monks, and others of their ilk fought only against carnal lust and were
proud of a victory which they never obtained. In the meanwhile they
harbored within their breasts pride, hatred, disdain, self-trust, contempt of
the Word of God, disloyalty, blasphemy, and other lusts of the flesh.
Against these sins they never fought because they never took them for

Christ alone can supply us with perfect righteousness. Therefore we must
always believe and always hope in Christ. “Whosoever believeth shall not
be ashamed.” (Rom. 9:33.)

Do not despair if you feel the flesh battling against the Spirit or if you
cannot make it behave. For you to follow the guidance of the Spirit in all
things without interference on the part of the flesh is impossible. You are
doing all you can if you resist the flesh and do not fulfill its demands.

When I was a monk I thought I was lost forever whenever I felt an evil
emotion, carnal lust, wrath, hatred, or envy. I tried to quiet my conscience
in many ways, but it did not work, because lust would always come back
and give me no rest. I told myself: “You have permitted this and that sin,
envy, impatience, and the like. Your joining this holy order has been in
vain, and all your good works are good for nothing.” If at that time I had
understood this passage, “The flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the
Spirit against the flesh,” I could have spared myself many a day of self-
torment. I would have said to myself: “Martin, you will never be without
sin, for you have flesh. Despair not, but resist the flesh.”

I remember how Doctor Staupitz used to say to me: “I have promised God
a thousand times that I would become a better man, but I never kept my
promise. From now on I am not going to make any more vows.
Experience has taught me that I cannot keep them. Unless God is merciful
to me for Christ’s sake and grants unto me a blessed departure, I shall not
be able to stand before Him.” His was a God-pleasing despair. No true
believer trusts in his own righteousness, but says with David, “Enter not
into judgment with thy servant; for in thy sight shall no man living be
justified.” (Ps. 143:2) Again, “If thou, Lord, shouldest mark iniquities, O
Lord, who shall stand?” (Ps. 130:3.)

No man is to despair of salvation just because he is aware of the lust of the
flesh. Let him be aware of it so long as he does not yield to it. The passion
of lust, wrath, and other vices may shake him, but they are not to get him
down. Sin may assail him, but he is not to welcome it. Yes, the better
Christian a man is, the more he will experience the heat of the conflict.
This explains the many expressions of regret in the Psalms and in the
entire Bible.
Everybody is to determine his peculiar weakness and guard against it.
Watch and wrestle in spirit against your weakness. Even if you cannot
completely overcome it, at least you ought to fight against it.

According to this description a saint is not one who is made of wood and
never feels any lusts or desires of the flesh. A true saint confesses his
righteousness and prays that his sins may be forgiven. The whole Church
prays for the forgiveness of sins and confesses that it believes in the
forgiveness of sins. If our antagonists would read the Scriptures they
would soon discover that they cannot judge rightly of anything, either of
sin or of holiness.

  VERSE 18. But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.

Here someone may object: “How come we are not under the law? You
yourself say, Paul, that we have the flesh which wars against the Spirit,
and brings us into subjection.”

But Paul says not to let it trouble us. As long as we are led by the Spirit,
and are willing to obey the Spirit who resists the flesh, we are not under
the Law. True believers are not under the Law. The Law cannot condemn
them although they feel sin and confess it.

Great then is the power of the Spirit. Led by the Spirit, the Law cannot
condemn the believer though he commits real sin. For Christ in whom
we believe is our righteousness. He is without sin, and the Law cannot
accuse Him. As long as we cling to Him we are led by the Spirit and are
free from the Law. Even as he teaches good works, the Apostle does not
lose sight of the doctrine of justification, but shows at every turn that it
is impossible for us to be justified by works.

The words, “If ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law,” are replete
with comfort. It happens at times that anger, hatred, impatience, carnal
desire, fear, sorrow, or some other lust of the flesh so overwhelms a man
that he cannot shake them off, though he try ever so hard. What should
he do? Should he despair? God forbid. Let him say to himself: “My flesh
seems to be on a warpath against the Spirit again. Go to it, flesh, and rage
all you want to. But you are not going to have your way. I follow the
leading of the Spirit.”

When the flesh begins to cut up the only remedy is to take the sword of
the Spirit, the word of salvation, and fight against the flesh. If you set the
Word out of sight, you are helpless against the flesh. I know this to be a
fact. I have been assailed by many violent passions, but as soon as I took
hold of some Scripture passage, my temptations left me. Without the
Word I could not have helped myself against the flesh.

  VERSE 19. Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these.

Paul is saying: “That none of you may hide behind the plea of ignorance I
will enumerate first the works of the flesh, and then also the works of the

There were many hypocrites among the Galatians, as there are also among
us, who pretend to be Christians and talk much about the Spirit, but they
walk not according to the Spirit; rather according to the flesh. Paul is out
to show them that they are not as holy as they like to have others think they

Every period of life has its own peculiar temptations. Not one true believer
whom the flesh does not again and again incite to impatience, anger,
pride. But it is one thing to be tempted by the flesh, and another thing to
yield to the flesh, to do its bidding without fear or remorse, and to
continue in sin.

Christians also fall and perform the lusts of the flesh. David fell horribly
into adultery. Peter also fell grievously when he denied Christ. However
great these sins were, they were not committed to spite God, but from
weakness. When their sins were brought to their attention these men did
not obstinately continue in their sin, but repented. Those who sin through
weakness are not denied pardon as long as they rise again and cease to sin.
There is nothing worse than to continue in sin. If they do not repent, but
obstinately continue to fulfill the desires of the flesh, it is a sure sign
that they are not sincere.

No person is free from temptations. Some are tempted in one way, others
in another way. One person is more easily tempted to bitterness and
sorrow of spirit, blasphemy, distrust, and despair. Another is more easily
tempted to carnal lust, anger, envy, covetousness. But no matter to which
sins we are disposed, we are to walk in the Spirit and resist the flesh.
Those who are Christ’s own crucify their flesh.

Some of the old saints labored so hard to attain perfection that they lost
the capacity to feel anything. When I was a monk I often wished I could
see a saint. I pictured him as living in the wilderness, abstaining from
meat and drink and living on roots and herbs and cold water. This weird
conception of those awesome saints I had gained out of the books of the
scholastics and church fathers. But we know now from the Scriptures who
the true saints are. Not those who live a single life, or make a fetish of
days, meats, clothes, and such things. The true saints are those who believe
that they are justified by the death of Christ. Whenever Paul writes to the
Christians here and there he calls them the holy children and heirs of
God. All who believe in Christ, whether male or female, bond or free, are
saints; not in view of their own works, but in view of the merits of God
which they appropriate by faith. Their holiness is a gift and not their own
personal achievement.

Ministers of the Gospel, public officials, parents, children, masters,
servants, etc., are true saints when they take Christ for their wisdom,
righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, and when they fulfill the
duties of their several vocations according to the standard of God’s Word
and repress the lust and desires of the flesh by the Spirit. Not everybody
can resist temptations with equal facilities. Imperfections are bound to
show up. But this does not prevent them from being holy. Their
unintentional lapses are forgiven if they pull themselves together by faith
in Christ. God forbid that we should sit in hasty judgment on those who
are weak in faith and life, as long as they love the Word of God and make
use of the supper of the Lord.

I thank God that He has permitted me to see (what as a monk I so  earnestly
desired to see) not one but many saints, whole multitudes of true  saints. Not
the kind of saints the papists admire, but the kind of saints  Christ wants. I
am sure I am one of Christ’s true saints. I am baptized. I  believe that
Christ my Lord has redeemed me from all my sins, and  invested me with His own
eternal righteousness and holiness. To hide in  caves and dens, to have a bony
body, to wear the hair long in the mistaken  idea that such departures from
normalcy will obtain some special regard  in heaven is not the holy life. A
holy life is to be baptized and to believe in  Christ, and to subdue the flesh
with the Spirit.

To feel the lusts of the flesh is not without profit to us. It prevents us
from  being vain and from being puffed up with the wicked opinion of our own
work-righteousness. The monks were so inflated with the opinion of their  own
righteousness, they thought they had so much holiness that they  could afford
to sell some of it to others, although their own hearts  convinced them of
unholiness. The Christian feels the unholy condition  of his heart, and it
makes him feel so low that he cannot trust in his good  works. He therefore
goes to Christ to find perfect righteousness. This keeps  a Christian humble.

  VERSES 19, 20. Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are
  these: adultery, fornification, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry,
  witchcraft . . .

Paul does not enumerate all the works of the flesh, but only certain ones.
First, he mentions various kinds of carnal lusts, as adultery, fornication,
wantonness, etc. But carnal lust is not the only work of the flesh, and so he
counts among the works of the flesh also idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, and
the like. These terms are so familiar that they do not require lengthy


The best religion, the most fervent devotion without Christ is plain
idolatry. It has been considered a holy act when the monks in their cells
meditate upon God and His works, and in a religious frenzy kneel down
to pray and to weep for joy. Yet Paul calls it simply idolatry. Every religion
which worships God in ignorance or neglect of His Word and will is

They may think about God, Christ, and heavenly things, but they do it
after their own fashion and not after the Word of God. They have an idea
that their clothing, their mode of living, and their conduct are holy and
pleasing to Christ. They not only expect to pacify Christ by the strictness of
their life, but also expect to be rewarded by Him for their good deeds.
Hence their best “spiritual” thoughts are wicked thoughts. Any worship of
God, any religion without Christ is idolatry. In Christ alone is God well

I have said before that the works of the flesh are manifest. But idolatry
puts on such a good front and acts so spiritual that the sham of it is
recognized only by true believers.


This sin was very common before the light of the Gospel appeared. When
I was a child there were many witches and sorcerers around who
“bewitched” cattle, and people, particularly children, and did much harm.
But now that the Gospel is here you do not hear so much about it because
the Gospel drives the devil away. Now he bewitches people in a worse way
with spiritual sorcery.

Witchcraft is a brand of idolatry. As witches used to bewitch cattle and
men, so idolaters, i.e., all the self-righteous, go around to bewitch God and
to make Him out as one who justifies men not by grace through faith in
Christ but by the works of men’s own choosing. They bewitch and deceive
themselves. If they continue in their wicked thoughts of God they will die
in their idolatry.


Under sects Paul here understands heresies. Heresies have always been
found in the church. What unity of faith can exist among all the different
monks and the different orders? None whatever. There is no unity of
spirit, no agreement of minds, but great dissension in the papacy. There is
no conformity in doctrine, faith, and life. On the other hand, among
evangelical Christians the Word, faith, religion, sacraments, service,
Christ, God, heart, and mind are common to all. This unity is not
disturbed by outward differences of station or of occupation.

                            DRUNKENNESS, GLUTTONY

Paul does not say that eating and drinking are works of the flesh, but
intemperance in eating and drinking, which is a common vice nowadays,
is a work of the flesh. Those who are given to excess are to know that they
are not spiritual but carnal. Sentence is pronounced upon them that they
shall not inherit the kingdom of heaven. Paul desires that Christians
avoid drunkenness and gluttony, that they live temperate and sober lives,
in order that the body may not grow soft and sensual.

  VERSE 21. Of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in
  the past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom
  of God.

This is a hard saying, but very necessary for those false Christians and
hypocrites who speak much about the Gospel, about faith, and the Spirit,
yet live after the flesh. But this hard sentence is directed chiefly at the
heretics who are large with their own self-importance, that they may be
frightened into taking up the fight of the Spirit against the flesh.

  VERSES 22, 23. But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace,
  longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance.

The Apostle does not speak of the works of the Spirit as he spoke of the
works of the flesh, but he attaches to these Christian virtues a better name.
He calls them the fruits of the Spirit.


It would have been enough to mention only the single fruit of love, for
love embraces all the fruits of the Spirit. In I Corinthians 13, Paul
attributes to love all the fruits of the Spirit: “Charity suffereth long, and
is kind,” etc. Here he lets love stand by itself among other fruits of the
Spirit to remind the Christians to love one another, “in honor preferring
one another,” to esteem others more than themselves because they have
Christ and the Holy Ghost within them.


Joy means sweet thoughts of Christ, melodious hymns and psalms, praises
and thanksgiving, with which Christians instruct, inspire, and refresh
themselves. God does not like doubt and dejection. He hates dreary
doctrine, gloomy and melancholy thought. God likes cheerful hearts. He
did not send His Son to fill us with sadness, but to gladden our hearts. For
this reason the prophets, apostles, and Christ Himself urge, yes, command
us to rejoice and be glad. “Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O
daughter of Jerusalem; behold, thy king cometh unto thee.” (Zech. 9:9.) In
the Psalms we are repeatedly told to be “joyful in the Lord.” Paul says:
“Rejoice in the Lord always.” Christ says: “Rejoice, for your names are
written in heaven.”


Peace towards God and men. Christians are to be peaceful and quiet. Not
argumentative, not hateful, but thoughtful and patient. There can be no
peace without longsuffering, and therefore Paul lists this virtue next.


Longsuffering is that quality which enables a person to bear adversity,
injury, reproach, and makes them patient to wait for the improvement of
those who have done him wrong. When the devil finds that he cannot
overcome certain persons by force he tries to overcome them in the long
run. He knows that we are weak and cannot stand anything long. Therefore
he repeats his temptation time and again until he succeeds. To withstand
his continued assaults we must be longsuffering and patiently wait for
the devil to get tired of his game.


Gentleness in conduct and life. True followers of the Gospel must not be
sharp and bitter, but gentle, mild, courteous, and soft-spoken, which
should encourage others to seek their company. Gentleness can overlook
other people’s faults and cover them up. Gentleness is always glad to give
in to others. Gentleness can get along with forward and difficult persons,
according to the old pagan saying: “You must know the manners of your
friends, but you must not hate them.” Such a gentle person was our Savior
Jesus Christ, as the Gospel portrays Him. Of Peter it is recorded that
he wept whenever he remembered the sweet gentleness of Christ in His
daily contact with people. Gentleness is an excellent virtue and very useful
in every walk of life.


A person is good when he is willing to help others in their need.

In listing faith among the fruits of the Spirit, Paul obviously does not
mean faith in Christ, but faith in men. Such faith is not suspicious of
people but believes the best. Naturally the possessor of such faith will be
deceived, but he lets it pass. He is ready to believe all men, but he will not
trust all men. Where this virtue is lacking men are suspicious, forward,
and wayward and will believe nothing nor yield to anybody. No matter
how well a person says or does anything, they will find fault with it, and if
you do not humor them you can never please them. It is quite impossible
to get along with them. Such faith in people therefore, is quite necessary.
What kind of life would this be if one person could not believe another


A person is meek when he is not quick to get angry. Many things occur in
daily life to provoke a person’s anger, but the Christian gets over his anger
by meekness.


Christians are to lead sober and chaste lives. They should not be adulterers,
fornicators, or sensualists. They should not be quarrelers or drunkards.
In the first and second chapters of the Epistle to Titus, the Apostle
admonishes bishops, young women, and married folks to be  chaste and pure.

  VERSE 23. Against such there is no law.

There is a law, of course, but it does not apply to those who bear these
fruits of the Spirit. The Law is not given for the righteous man. A true
Christian conducts himself in such a way that he does not need any law to
warn or to restrain him. He obeys the Law without compulsion. The Law
does not concern him. As far as he is concerned there would not have to
be any Law.

  VERSE 24. And they that are Christ’s have crucified the flesh with the
  affections and lusts.

True believers are no hypocrites. They crucify the flesh with its evil desires
and lusts. Inasmuch as they have not altogether put off the sinful flesh
they are inclined to sin. They do not fear or love God as they should. They
are likely to be provoked to anger, to envy, to impatience, to carnal lust,
and other emotions. But they will not do the things to which the flesh
incites them. They crucify the flesh with its evil desires and lusts by
fasting and exercise and, above all, by a walk in the Spirit.

To resist the flesh in this manner is to nail it to the Cross. Although the
flesh is still alive it cannot very well act upon its desires because it is
bound and nailed to the Cross.

  VERSE 25. If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.
A little while ago the Apostle had condemned those who are envious and
start heresies and schisms. As if he had forgotten that he had already
berated them, the Apostle once more reproves those who provoke and
envy others. Was not one reference to them sufficient? He repeats his
admonition in order to emphasize the viciousness of pride that had
caused all the trouble in the churches of Galatia, and has always caused the
Church of Christ no end of difficulties. In his Epistle to Titus the Apostle
states that a vainglorious man should not be ordained as a minister, for
pride, as St. Augustine points out, is the mother of all heresies.

Now vainglory has always been a common poison in the world. There is
no village too small to contain someone who wants to be considered wiser
or better than the rest. Those who have been bitten by pride usually stand
upon the reputation for learning and wisdom. Vainglory is not nearly so
bad in a private person or even in an official as it is in a minister.

When the poison of vainglory gets into the Church you have no idea
what havoc it can cause. You may argue about knowledge, art, money,
countries, and the like without doing particular harm. But you cannot
quarrel about salvation or damnation, about eternal life and eternal death
without grave damage to the Church. No wonder Paul exhorts all ministers
of the Word to guard against this poison. He writes: “If we live in the
Spirit.” Where the Spirit is, men gain new attitudes. Where formerly
they were vainglorious, spiteful and envious, they now become humble,
gentle and patient. Such men seek not their own glory, but the glory
of God. They do not provoke each other to wrath or envy, but prefer
others to themselves.

As dangerous to the Church as this abominable pride is, yet there is
nothing more common. The trouble with the ministers of Satan is that
they look upon the ministry as a stepping-stone to fame and glory, and
right there you have the seed for all sorts of dissensions.

Because Paul knew that the vainglory of the false Apostles had caused the
churches of Galatia endless trouble, he makes it his business to suppress
this abominable vice. In his absence the false apostles went to work in
Galatia. They pretended that they had been on intimate terms with the
apostles, while Paul had never seen Christ in person or had much contact
with the rest of the apostles. Because of this they delivered him, rejected
his doctrine, and boosted their own. In this way they troubled the
Galatians and caused quarrels among them until they provoked and
envied each other; which goes to show that neither the false apostles nor
the Galatians walked after the Spirit, but after the flesh.

The Gospel is not there for us to aggrandize ourselves. The Gospel is to
aggrandize Christ and the mercy of God. It holds out to men eternal gifts
that are not gifts of our own manufacture. What right have we to receive
praise and glory for gifts that are not of our own making?

No wonder that God in His special grace subjects the ministers of the
Gospel to all kinds of afflictions, otherwise they could not cope with this
ugly beast called vainglory. If no persecution, no cross, or reproach trailed
the doctrine of the Gospel, but only praise and reputation, the ministers of
the Gospel would choke with pride. Paul had the Spirit of Christ.
Nevertheless there was given unto him the messenger of Satan to buffet
him in order that he should not come to exalt himself, because of the
grandeur of his revelations. St. Augustine’s opinion is well taken: “If a
minister of the Gospel is praised, he is in danger; if he is despised, he is
also in danger.”

The ministers of the Gospel should be men who are not too easily affected
by praise or criticism, but simply speak out the benefit and the glory of
Christ and seek the salvation of souls.

Whenever you are being praised, remember it is not you who is being
praised but Christ, to whom all praise belongs. When you preach the
Word of God in its purity and also live accordingly, it is not your own
doing, but God’s doing. And when people praise you, they really mean to
praise God in you. When you understand this–and you should because
“what hast thou that thou didst not receive?”–you will not flatter
yourself on the one hand and on the other hand you will not carry
yourself with the thought of resigning from the ministry when you are
insulted, reproached, or persecuted.

It is really kind of God to send so much infamy, reproach, hatred, and
cursing our way to keep us from getting proud of the gifts of God in us.
We need a millstone around our neck to keep us humble. There are a few
on our side who love and revere us for the ministry of the Word, but for
every one of these there are a hundred on the other side who hate and
persecute us.

The Lord is our glory. Such gifts as we possess we acknowledge to be the
gifts of God, given to us for the good of the Church of Christ. Therefore we
are not proud because of them. We know that more is required of them to
whom much is given, than of such to whom little is given. We also know
that God is no respecter of persons. A plain factory hand who does his work
faithfully pleases God just as much as a minister of the Word.

  VERSE 26. Let us not be desirous of vain glory.

To desire vainglory is to desire lies, because when one person praises
another he tells lies. What is there in anybody to praise? But it is different
when the ministry is praised. We should not only desire people to praise
the ministry of the Gospel but also do our utmost to make the ministry
worthy of praise because this will make the ministry more effective. Paul
warns the Romans not to bring Christianity into disrepute. “Let not then
your good be evil spoken of.” (Rom. 14:16.) He also begged the Corinthians
to “give no offense in anything, that the ministry be not blamed.” (I Cor.
6:3.) When people praise our ministry they are not praising our persons,
but God.

  VERSE 26. Provoking one another, envying one another.

Such is the ill effect of vainglory. Those who teach errors provoke others.
When others disapprove and reject the doctrine the teachers of errors get
angry in turn, and then you have strife and trouble. The sectarians hate us
furiously because we will not approve their errors. We did not attack them
directly. We merely called attention to certain abuses in the Church. They
did not like it and became sore at us, because it hurt their pride. They wish
to be the lone rulers of the church.

                                  CHAPTER 6

  VERSE 1. Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault ye which are
  spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness.

IF we carefully weigh the words of the Apostle we perceive that he does not
speak of doctrinal faults and errors, but of much lesser faults by which a
person is overtaken through the weakness of his flesh. This explains why
the Apostle chooses the softer term “fault.” To minimize the offense still
more, as if he meant to excuse it altogether and to take the whole blame
away from the person who has committed the fault, he speaks of him as
having been “overtaken,” seduced by the devil and of the flesh. As if he
meant to say, “What is more human than for a human being to fall, to be
deceived and to err?” This comforting sentence at one time saved my life.
Because Satan always assails both the purity of doctrine which he
endeavors to take away by schisms and the purity of life which he spoils
with his continual temptations to sin, Paul explains how the fallen should
be treated. Those who are strong are to raise up the fallen in the spirit of

This ought to be borne in mind particularly by the ministers of the Word
in order that they may not forget the parental attitude which Paul here
requires of those who have the keeping of souls. Pastors and ministers
must, of course, rebuke the fallen, but when they see that the fallen are
sorry they are to comfort them by excusing the fault as well as they can. As
unyielding as the Holy Spirit is in the matter of maintaining and defending
the doctrine of faith, so mild and merciful is He toward men for their sins
as long as sinners repent.

The Pope’s synagogue teaches the exact opposite of what the Apostle  commands.
The clerics are tyrants and butchers of men’s conscience. Every  small offense
is closely scrutinized. To justify the cruel inquisitiveness they  quote the
statement of Pope Gregory: “It is the property of good lives to be  afraid of
a fault where there is no fault.” “Our censors must be feared, even  if they
are unjust and wrong.” On these pronouncements the papists base  their
doctrine of excommunication. Rather than terrify and condemn  men’s
consciences, they ought to raise them up and comfort them with the  truth.

Let the ministers of the Gospel learn from Paul how to deal with those
who have sinned. “Brethren,” he says, “if any man be overtaken with a
fault, do not aggravate his grief, do not scold him, do not condemn him,
but lift him up and gently restore his faith. If you see a brother despondent
over a sin he has committed, run up to him, reach out your hand to him,
comfort him with the Gospel and embrace him like a mother. When you
meet a willful sinner who does not care, go after him and rebuke him
sharply.” But this is not the treatment for one who has been overtaken by a
sin and is sorry. He must be dealt with in the spirit of meekness and not in
the spirit of severity. A repentant sinner is not to be given gall and vinegar
to drink.

  VERSE 1. Considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.
This consideration is very much needed to put a stop to the severity of
some pastors who show the fallen no mercy. St. Augustine says: “There is
no sin which one person has committed, that another person may not
commit it also.” We stand in slippery places. If we become overbearing and
neglect our duty, it is easy enough to fall into sin. In the book entitled
“The Lives of Our Fathers,” one of the Fathers is reported to have said
when informed that a brother had fallen into adultery: “He fell yesterday; I
may fall today.” Paul therefore warns the pastors not to be too rigorous and
unmerciful towards offenders, but to show them every affection, always
remembering: “This man fell into sin; I may fall into worse sin. If those
who are always so eager to condemn others would investigate themselves
they would find that the sins of others are motes in comparison to their

“Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.” (I Cor.
10:12.) If David who was a hero of faith and did so many great things for the
Lord, could fall so badly that in spite of his advanced age he was overcome
by youthful lust after he had withstood so many different temptations with
which the Lord had tested his faith, who are we to think that we are more
stable? These object lessons of God should convince us that of all things
God hates pride.

  VERSE 2. Bear ye one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of

The Law of Christ is the Law of love. Christ gave us no other law than this
law of mutual love: “A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love  one
another.” To love means to bear another’s burdens. Christians must  have
strong shoulders to bear the burdens of their fellow Christians.  Faithful
pastors recognize many errors and offenses in the church, which  they oversee.
In civil affairs an official has to overlook much if he is fit to  rule. If we
can overlook our own shortcomings and wrong-doings, we  ought to overlook the
shortcomings of others in accordance with the  words, “Bear ye one another’s

Those who fail to do so expose their lack of understanding of the law of
Christ. Love, according to Paul, “believeth all things, hopeth all things,
endureth all things.” This commandment is not meant for those who deny
Christ; neither is it meant for those who continue to live in sin. Only those
who are willing to hear the Word of God and then inadvertently fall into
sin to their own great sorrow and regret, carry the burdens which the
Apostle encourages us to bear. Let us not be hard on them. If Christ did not
punish them, what right have we to do it?

  VERSE 3. For if a man think himself to be something, when he is
  nothing, he deceiveth himself.

Again the Apostle takes the authors of sects to task for being hard-hearted
tyrants. They despise the weak and demand that everything be just so.
Nothing suits them except what they do. Unless you eulogize whatever
they say or do, unless you adapt yourself to their slightest whim, they
become angry with you. They are that way because, as St. Paul says, they
“think themselves to be something,” they think they know all about the

Paul has their number when he calls them zeros. They deceive themselves
with their self-suggested wisdom and holiness. They have no understanding
of Christ or the law of Christ. By insisting that everything be perfect they
not only fail to bear the burdens of the weak, they actually offend the weak
by their severity. People begin to hate and shun them and  refuse to accept
counsel or comfort from them.

Paul describes these stiff and ungracious saints accurately when he says of
them, “They think themselves to be something.” Bloated by their own silly
ideas and schemes they entertain a pretty fair opinion of themselves, when
in reality they amount to nothing.

  VERSE 4. But let every man prove his own work, and then shall he have
  rejoicing in himself alone, and not in another.

In this verse the Apostle continues his attack upon the vainglorious
sectarians. Although this passage may be applied to any work, the Apostle
has in mind particularly the work of the ministry.

The trouble with these seekers after glory is that they never stop to consider
whether their ministry is straightforward and faithful. All they think about
is whether people will like and praise them. Theirs is a threefold sin. First,
they are greedy of praise. Secondly, they are very sly and wily in suggesting
that the ministry of other pastors is not what it should be. By way of
contrast they hope to rise in the estimation of the people. Thirdly, once they
have established a reputation for themselves they become so chesty that
they stop short of nothing. When they have won the praise of men, pride
leads them on to belittle the work of other men and to applaud their own.
In this artful manner they hoodwink the people who rather enjoy to see
their former pastors taken down a few notches by such upstarts.

“Let a minister be faithful in his office,” is the apostolic injunction. “Let
him not seek his own glory or look for praise. Let him desire to do good
work and to preach the Gospel in all its purity. Whether an ungrateful
world appreciates his efforts is to give him no concern because, after all,
he is in the ministry not for his own glory but for the glory of Christ.”

A faithful minister cares little what people think of him, as long as his
conscience approves of him. The approval of his own good conscience is
the best praise a minister can have. To know that we have taught the Word
of God and administered the sacraments rightly is to have a glory that
cannot be taken away.

The glory which the sectarians seek is quite unstable, because it rests in the
whim of people. If Paul had had to depend on this kind of glory for his
ministry he would have despaired when he saw the many offenses and
evils following in the wake of his preaching.

If we had to feel that the success of our ministry depended upon our
popularity with men we would die, because we are not popular. On the
contrary, we are hated by the whole world with rare bitterness. Nobody
praises us. Everybody finds fault with us. But we can glory in the Lord and
attend to our work cheerfully. Who cares whether our efforts please or
displease the devil? Who cares whether the world praises or hates us? We
go ahead “by honour and dishonour, by evil report and good report.” (II Cor.

The Gospel entails persecution. The Gospel is that kind of a doctrine.
Furthermore, the disciples of the Gospel are not all dependable. Many
embrace the Gospel today and tomorrow discard it. To preach the Gospel
for praise is bad business especially when people stop praising you. Find
your praise in the testimony of a good conscience.

This passage may also be applied to other work besides the ministry. When
an official, a servant, a teacher minds his business and performs his duty
faithfully without concerning himself about matters that are not in his line
he may rejoice in himself. The best commendation of any work is to know
that one has done the work that God has given him well and that God is
pleased with his effort.

  VERSE 5. Every man shall bear his own burden.

That means: For anybody to covet praise is foolish because the praise of
men will be of no help to you in the hour of death. Before the judgment
throne of Christ everybody will have to bear his own burden. As it is the
praise of men stops when we die. Before the eternal Judge it is not praise
that counts but your own conscience.

True, the consciousness of work well done cannot quiet the conscience. But
it is well to have the testimony of a good conscience in the last judgment
that we have performed our duty faithfully in accordance with God’s will.

For the suppression of pride we need the strength of prayer. What man
even if he is a Christian is not delighted with his own praise? Only the
Holy Spirit can preserve us from the misfortune of pride.

  VERSE 6. Let him that is taught in the word communicate unto him that
  teacheth in all good things.

Now the Apostle also addresses the hearers of the Word requesting them
to bestow “all good things” upon those who have taught them the Gospel. I
have often wondered why all the apostles reiterated this request with such
embarrassing frequency. In the papacy I saw the people give generously for
the erection and maintenance of luxurious church buildings and for the
sustenance of men appointed to the idolatrous service of Rome. I saw
bishops and priests grow rich until they possessed the choicest real estate.
I thought then that Paul’s admonitions were overdone. I thought he should
have requested the people to curtail their contributions. I saw how the
generosity of the people of the Church was encouraging covetousness on
the part of the clergy. I know better now.

As often as I read the admonitions of the Apostle to the effect that the
churches should support their pastors and raise funds for the relief of
impoverished Christians I am half ashamed to think that the great Apostle
Paul had to touch upon this subject so frequently. In writing to the
Corinthians he needed two chapters to impress this matter upon them. I
would not want to discredit Wittenberg as Paul discredited the
Corinthians by urging them at such length to contribute to the relief of the
poor. It seems to be a by-product of the Gospel that nobody wants to
contribute to the maintenance of the Gospel ministry. When the doctrine
of the devil is preached people are prodigal in their willing support of
those who deceive them.

We have come to understand why it is so necessary to repeat the
admonition of this verse. When Satan cannot suppress the preaching of
the Gospel by force he tries to accomplish his purpose by striking the
ministers of the Gospel with poverty. He curtails their income to such an
extent that they are forced out of the ministry because they cannot live by
the Gospel. Without ministers to proclaim the Word of God the people go
wild like savage beasts.

Paul’s admonition that the hearers of the Gospel share all good things with
their pastors and teachers is certainly in order. To the Corinthians he
wrote: “If we have sown unto you spiritual things is it a great thing if we
shall reap your carnal things?” (I Cor. 9:11.) In the old days when the Pope
reigned supreme everybody paid plenty for masses. The begging friars
brought in their share. Commercial priests counted the daily offerings.
From these extortions our countrymen are now delivered by the Gospel.
You would think they would be grateful for their emancipation and give
generously for the support of the ministry of the Gospel and the relief of
impoverished Christians. Instead, they rob Christ. When the members of a
Christian congregation permit their pastor to struggle along in penury, they
are worse than heathen.

Before very long they are going to suffer for their ingratitude. They
will lose their temporal and spiritual possessions. This sin merits the
severest punishment. The reason why the churches of Galatia, Corinth,
and other places were troubled by false apostles was this, that they had so
little regard for their faithful ministers. You cannot refuse to give God a
penny who gives you all good things, even life eternal, and turn around
and give the devil, the giver of all evil and death eternal, pieces of gold,
and not be punished for it.

The words “in all good things: are not to be understood to mean that
people are to give all they have to their ministers, but that they should
support them liberally and give them enough to live well.

  VERSE 7. Be not deceived; God is not mocked.

The Apostle is so worked up over this matter that he is not content with a
mere admonition. He utters the threatening words, “God is not mocked.”
Our countrymen think it good sport to despise the ministry. They like to
treat the ministers like servants and slaves. “Be not deceived,” warns the
Apostle, “God is not mocked.” God will not be mocked in His ministers.
Christ said: “He that despiseth you, despiseth me.” (Luke 10:16.) To Samuel
God said: “They have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me.” (I Sam.
8:7.) Be careful, you scoffers. God may postpone His punishment for a time,
but He will find you out in time, and punish you for despising His
servants. You cannot laugh at God. Maybe the people are little impressed by
the threats of God, but in the hour of their death they shall know whom
they have mocked. God is not ever going to let His ministers starve. When
the rich suffer the pangs of hunger God will feed His own servants. “In the
days of famine they shall be satisfied.” (Ps. 37:19.)

  VERSE 7. For whatever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.

These passages are all meant to benefit us ministers. I must say I do not
find much pleasure in explaining these verses. I am made to appear as if I
am speaking for my own benefit. If a minister preaches on money he is
likely to be accused of covetousness. Still people must be told these things
that they may know their duty over against their pastors. Our Savior says:
“Eating and drinking such things as they give; for the laborer is worthy of
his hire.” (Luke 10:7.) And Paul says elsewhere: “Do ye not know that they
which minister about holy things live of the things of the temple?” and
they which wait at the altar are partakers with the altar? Even so hath the
Lord ordained, that they which preach the gospel should live of the
gospel.” (I Cor. 9:13, 14.)

  VERSE 8. For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap
  corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap
  everlasting life.

This simile of sowing and reaping also refers to the proper support of
ministers. “He that soweth to the Spirit,” i.e., he that honors the ministers
of God is doing a spiritual thing and will reap everlasting life. “He that
soweth to the flesh,” i.e., he that has nothing left for the ministers of God,
but only thinks of himself, that person will reap of the flesh corruption,
not only in this life but also in the life to come. The Apostle wants to stir
up his readers to be generous to their pastors.

That the ministers of the Church need support any man with common
sense can see. Though this support is something physical the Apostle does
not hesitate to call it sowing to the Spirit. When people scrape up
everything they can lay their hands on and keep everything for themselves
the Apostle calls it a sowing to the flesh. He pronounces those who sow to
the Spirit blessed for this life and the life to come, while those who sow to
the flesh are accursed now and forever.

  VERSE 9. And let us not be weary in well doing: for in due season we
  shall reap, if we faint not.

The Apostle intends soon to close his Epistle and therefore repeats once
more the general exhortation unto good deeds. He means to say “Let us do
good not only to the ministers of the Gospel, but to everybody, and let us
do it without weariness.” It is easy enough to do good once or twice, but to
keep on doing good without getting disgusted with the ingratitude of those
whom we have benefited, that is not so easy. Therefore the Apostle does
not only admonish us to do good, but to do good untiringly. For our
encouragement he adds the promise: “For in due season we shall reap, if
we faint not.” “Wait for the harvest and then you will reap the reward of
your sowing to the Spirit. Think of that when you do good and the
ingratitude of men will not stop you from doing good.”

  VERSE 10. As we have therefore opportunity, let us do good unto all
  men, especially unto them who are of the household of faith.

In this verse the Apostle summarizes his instructions on the proper
support of the ministers and of the poor. He paraphrases the words of
Christ: “I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the
night cometh, when no man can work.” (John 9:4.) Our good deeds are to
be directed primarily at those who share the Christian faith with us, “the
household of faith,” as Paul calls them, among whom the ministers rank
first as objects of our well doing.

  VERSE 11. Ye see how large a letter I have written unto you with mine
  own hand.

With these words the Apostle intends to draw the Galatians on. “I never,”
he says, “wrote such a long letter with my own hand to any of the other
churches.” His other epistles he dictated, and only subscribed his greetings
and his signature with his own hand.

  VERSE 12. As many as desire to make a fair shew in the flesh, they
  constrain you to be circumcised; only lest they should suffer
  persecution for the cross of Christ.

Paul once more scores the false apostles in an effort to draw the Galatians
away from their false doctrine. “The teachers you have now do not seek the
glory of Christ and the salvation of your souls, but only their own glory.
They avoid the Cross. They do not understand what they teach.”

These three counts against the false apostles are of so serious a nature that
no Christian could have fellowship with them. But not all the Galatians
obeyed the warning of Paul.

The Apostle’s attack upon the false apostles was not unjustified. Neither
are our attacks upon the papacy. When we call the Pope the Antichrist and
his minions an evil brood, we do not slander them. We merely judge them
by the touchstone of God’s Word recorded in the first chapter of this
Epistle: “Though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel
unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be

  VERSE 13. For neither they themselves who are circumcised keep the
  law; but desire to have you circumcised, that they may glory in your

In other words: “I shall tell you what kind of teachers you have now. They
avoid the Cross, they teach no certain truths. They think they are
performing the Law, but they are not. They have not the Holy Spirit and
without Him nobody can keep the Law.” Where the Holy Ghost does not
dwell in men there dwells an unclean spirit, a spirit that despises God and
turns every effort at keeping the Law into a double sin.

Mark what the Apostle is saying: Those who are circumcised do not fulfill
the Law. No self-righteous person ever does. To work, pray, or suffer apart
from Christ is to work, pray, and to suffer in vain, “for whatsoever is not of
faith is sin.” It does a person no good to be circumcised, to fast, to pray,
or to do anything, if in his heart he despises Christ.

“Why do the false apostles insist that you should be circumcised? Not for
the sake of your righteousness,” although they give that impression, but
“that they may glory in your flesh.” Now what sort of an ambition is that?
Worst of all, they force circumcision upon you for no other reason than the
satisfaction they get out of your submission.

  VERSE 14. But God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our
  Lord Jesus Christ.

“God forbid,” says the Apostle, “that I should glory in anything as
dangerous as the false apostles glory in because what they glory in is a
poison that destroys many souls, and I wish it were buried in hell. Let them
glory in the flesh if they wish and let them perish in their glory. As for me
I glory in the Cross of our Lord Jesus Christ.” He expresses the same sentiment
in the fifth chapter of the Epistle to the Romans, where he says: “We glory
in tribulations”; and in the twelfth chapter of the Second Epistle to the
Corinthians: “Most gladly, therefore, will l rather glory in my infirmities.”
According to these expressions the glory of a Christian consists in
tribulations, reproaches, and infirmities.

And this is our glory today with the Pope and the whole world persecuting
us and trying to kill us. We know that we suffer these things not because
we are thieves and murderers, but for Christ’s sake whose Gospel we
proclaim. We have no reason to complain. The world, of course, looks
upon us as unhappy and accursed creatures, but Christ for whose sake we
suffer pronounces us blessed and bids us to rejoice. “Blessed are ye,” says
He, “when men shall revile you, and persecute you. and shall say all
manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. Rejoice, and be exceeding
glad.” (Matt. 5:11, 12.)

By the Cross of Christ is not to be understood here the two pieces of wood
to which He was nailed, but all the afflictions of the believers whose
sufferings are Christ’s sufferings. Elsewhere Paul writes: “Who now rejoice
in my sufferings for you, and fill up that which is behind of the afflictions
of Christ in my flesh for his body’s sake, which is the church.” (Col. 1:24.)

It is good for us to know this lest we sink into despair when our opponents
persecute us. Let us bear the cross for Christ’s sake. It will ease our
sufferings and make them light as Christ says, Matthew 11:30, “My yoke is
easy, and my burden is light.”

  VERSE 14. By whom the world is crucified unto me, and I unto the world.

“The world is crucified unto me,” means that I condemn the world. “I am
crucified unto the world,” means that the world in turn condemns me. I
detest the doctrine, the self-righteousness, and the works of the world. The
world in turn detests my doctrine and condemns me as a revolutionary
heretic. Thus the world is crucified unto us and we unto the world.

The monks imagined the world was crucified unto them when they
entered the monastery. Not the world, but Christ, is crucified in the

In this verse Paul expresses his hatred of the world. The hatred was
mutual. As Paul, so we are to despise the world and the devil. With Christ
on our side we can defy him and say: “Satan, the more you hurt me, the
more I oppose you.”

  VERSE 15. For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth anything,
  nor uncircumcision, but a new creature.

Since circumcision and uncircumcision are contrary matters we would
expect the Apostle to say that one or the other might accomplish some
good. But he denies that either of them do any good. Both are of no value
because in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avail

Reason fails to understand this, “for the natural man receiveth not the
things of the Spirit of God.” (I Cor. 2:14.) It therefore seeks righteousness
in externals. However, we learn from the Word of God that there is
nothing under the sun that can make us righteous before God and a new
creature except Christ Jesus.

A new creature is one in whom the image of God has been renewed. Such
a creature cannot be brought into life by good works, but by Christ alone.
Good works may improve the outward appearance, but they cannot
produce a new creature. A new creature is the work of the Holy Ghost, who
imbues our hearts with faith, love, and other Christian virtues, grants us
the strength to subdue the flesh and to reject the righteousness of the

  VERSE 16. And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them,
  and mercy.

This is the rule by which we ought to live, “that ye put on the new man,
which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness.” (Eph. 4:24.)
Those who walk after this rule enjoy the favor of God, the forgiveness of
their sins, and peace of conscience. Should they ever be overtaken by any
sin, the mercy of God supports them.

  VERSE 17. From henceforth let no man trouble me.

The Apostle speaks these words with a certain amount of indignation. “I
have preached the Gospel to you in conformity with the revelation which I
received from Jesus Christ. If you do not care for it, very well. Trouble me
no more. Trouble me no more.”

  VERSE 17. For I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus.

“The marks on my body indicate whose servant I am. If I was anxious to
please men, if I approved of circumcision and good works as factors in our
salvation, if I would take delight in your flesh as the false apostles do, I
would not have these marks on my body. But because I am the servant of
Jesus Christ and publicly declare that no person can obtain the salvation of
his soul outside of Christ, I must bear the badge of my Lord. These marks
were given to me against my will as decorations from the devil and for no
other merit but that I made known Jesus.”

Of the marks of suffering which he bore in his body the Apostle makes
frequent mention in his epistles. “I think,” he says, “that God hath set forth
us the apostles last, as it were appointed to death: for we are made a
spectacle unto the world, and to angels, and to men.” (I Cor. 4:9.) Again,
“Unto this present hour we both hunger, and thirst, and are naked, and are
buffeted, and have no certain dwellingplace; And labour, working with our
hands: being reviled, we bless; being persecuted, we suffer it; being
defamed, we intreat: we are made as the filth of the world, and are the
offscouring of all things unto this day.” (I Cor. 4:11-13.)

  VERSE 18. Brethren, the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your
  spirit. Amen.

This is the Apostle’s farewell. He ends his Epistle as he began it by wishing
the Galatians the grace of God. We can hear him say: “I have presented
Christ to you, I have pleaded with you, I have reproved you, I have
overlooked nothing that I thought might be of benefit to you. All I can do
now is to pray that our Lord Jesus Christ would bless my Epistle and grant
you the guidance of the Holy Ghost.”

The Lord Jesus Christ, our Savior, who gave me the strength and the grace
to explain this Epistle and granted you the grace to hear it, preserve and
strengthen us in faith unto the day of our redemption. To Him, the Father
and the Son and the Holy Spirit, be glory, world without end. Amen.

Doc Viewed 16130 times

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.